Re: Proposal: Abandon v8 package

2019-03-07 Thread Stephen Gallagher
Great, thanks. I took a look and did a review. I have a couple minor tweaks I'd like to see, then I'll go ahead and merge it (and backport/sideport it to the 8.x and 11.x branches) On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 6:44 AM Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote: > > On Thu, 28 Feb 2019 at 16:24, Stephen Gallagher

Re: Proposal: Abandon v8 package

2019-03-07 Thread Elliott Sales de Andrade
On Thu, 28 Feb 2019 at 16:24, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 7:02 PM Elliott Sales de Andrade > wrote: > > > > Let's try this again, but CC'ing the package owners. > > > > On 2019-02-17 9:12 p.m., Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Sorry for resurrecting a

Re: Proposal: Abandon v8 package

2019-02-28 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 7:02 PM Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote: > > Let's try this again, but CC'ing the package owners. > > On 2019-02-17 9:12 p.m., Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Sorry for resurrecting a long-dead thread, but a few things happened > > recently: > > 1. v8 was ju

Re: Proposal: Abandon v8 package

2019-02-27 Thread Elliott Sales de Andrade
Let's try this again, but CC'ing the package owners. On 2019-02-17 9:12 p.m., Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote: > Hi, > > Sorry for resurrecting a long-dead thread, but a few things happened recently: > 1. v8 was just retired last week or so, > 2. R-V8 just ported itself from v8-314 to v8 LTS 6/7.

Re: Proposal: Abandon v8 package

2019-02-17 Thread Elliott Sales de Andrade
Hi, Sorry for resurrecting a long-dead thread, but a few things happened recently: 1. v8 was just retired last week or so, 2. R-V8 just ported itself from v8-314 to v8 LTS 6/7. Currently, R-V8 supports both v8-314 and v8, but as the latter fixes several downstream package issues, it is the recom

Re: Proposal: Abandon v8 package

2018-06-11 Thread Eamon Walsh
On 6/11/2018 10:42 AM, Tom Callaway wrote: > Background: > > I made the original v8 Fedora package many moons ago, when I was more > optimistic about the possibility of separating the useful components > inside of chromium. Since that point, it has become clear that while v8 > is useful software, t

Re: Proposal: Abandon v8 package

2018-06-11 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 10:43 AM Tom Callaway wrote: > Background: > > I made the original v8 Fedora package many moons ago, when I was more > optimistic about the possibility of separating the useful components > inside of chromium. Since that point, it has become clear that while v8 > is useful

Proposal: Abandon v8 package

2018-06-11 Thread Tom Callaway
Background: I made the original v8 Fedora package many moons ago, when I was more optimistic about the possibility of separating the useful components inside of chromium. Since that point, it has become clear that while v8 is useful software, the following facts are also true: 1. The v8 upstream