Re: Please remember to update rawhide

2010-09-02 Thread Kyle McMartin
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 10:38:05AM -0400, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > This doesn't mention the important problem that prompted the discussion in > FESCo the other day: > > When you do an update in F-14 and rely on inheritance to get the package > into rawhide, there is a problem. That package will n

Re: Please remember to update rawhide

2010-09-02 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 10:43:40AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Toshio Kuratomi writes: > > When you do an update in F-14 and rely on inheritance to get the package > > into rawhide, there is a problem. That package will not go to rawhide until > > it hits stable in F-14. > > ... um ... and why exac

Re: Please remember to update rawhide

2010-09-02 Thread Jesse Keating
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 9/2/10 7:43 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > Toshio Kuratomi writes: >> When you do an update in F-14 and rely on inheritance to get the package >> into rawhide, there is a problem. That package will not go to rawhide until >> it hits stable in F-14. > > ..

Re: Please remember to update rawhide

2010-09-02 Thread Tom Lane
Rex Dieter writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> Toshio Kuratomi writes: >>> When you do an update in F-14 and rely on inheritance to get the package >>> into rawhide, there is a problem. That package will not go to rawhide >>> until it hits stable in F-14. >> >> ... um ... and why exactly is that the p

Re: Please remember to update rawhide

2010-09-02 Thread Rex Dieter
Tom Lane wrote: > Toshio Kuratomi writes: >> When you do an update in F-14 and rely on inheritance to get the package >> into rawhide, there is a problem. That package will not go to rawhide >> until it hits stable in F-14. > > ... um ... and why exactly is that the policy? I figure one reason

Re: Please remember to update rawhide

2010-09-02 Thread Tom Lane
Toshio Kuratomi writes: > When you do an update in F-14 and rely on inheritance to get the package > into rawhide, there is a problem. That package will not go to rawhide until > it hits stable in F-14. ... um ... and why exactly is that the policy? > That means, for the typical F-14 workflow o

Re: Please remember to update rawhide

2010-09-02 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 09:02:43PM -0400, Kyle McMartin wrote: > Hi folks, > > FESCo has heard a few complaints of cases where packages were newer (in > some cases several versions newer) in F-14 than in rawhide. So this is > just a friendly reminder that you should be updating rawhide > (dist-f15

Re: Please remember to update rawhide

2010-09-02 Thread Tom Lane
Harald Hoyer writes: > On 09/02/2010 03:02 AM, Kyle McMartin wrote: >> FESCo has heard a few complaints of cases where packages were newer (in >> some cases several versions newer) in F-14 than in rawhide. So this is >> just a friendly reminder that you should be updating rawhide > Well, can't we

Re: Please remember to update rawhide

2010-09-02 Thread Harald Hoyer
On 09/02/2010 03:02 AM, Kyle McMartin wrote: > Hi folks, > > FESCo has heard a few complaints of cases where packages were newer (in > some cases several versions newer) in F-14 than in rawhide. So this is > just a friendly reminder that you should be updating rawhide > (dist-f15) in addition to br

Please remember to update rawhide

2010-09-01 Thread Kyle McMartin
Hi folks, FESCo has heard a few complaints of cases where packages were newer (in some cases several versions newer) in F-14 than in rawhide. So this is just a friendly reminder that you should be updating rawhide (dist-f15) in addition to branched (dist-f14.) Inheritence from F-14 into rawhide is