On 03/06/20 01:04 +0200, Denis Arnaud wrote:
Yes, sure, no problem. I'll rebuild them soon (maybe this weekend).
A big big thanks to you, Jonathan, to have done that important Boost
release! It is a lot of work, and the result is well appreciated!
Also, just for the sake of following up on on-g
Yes, sure, no problem. I'll rebuild them soon (maybe this weekend).
A big big thanks to you, Jonathan, to have done that important Boost
release! It is a lot of work, and the result is well appreciated!
Also, just for the sake of following up on on-going Python development, my
guess is that this
On 01/06/20 02:14 -, Denis Arnaud wrote:
Thanks for the follow up!
| airinv airrac airtsp rmol sevmgr trademgen
All those packages have been successfully rebuilt (after upstream upgrade):
* airinv: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-d6b3c81762
* airrac: https://bodhi.fedora
Miro Hrončok writes:
> python-metaextract defolos
This should be fixed in Rawhide as well.
Cheers,
Dan
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@l
On 01. 06. 20 4:14, Denis Arnaud wrote:
Thanks for the follow up!
| airinv airrac airtsp rmol sevmgr trademgen
All those packages have been successfully rebuilt (after upstream upgrade):
* airinv: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-d6b3c81762
* airrac: https://bodhi.fedoraproje
Thanks for the follow up!
| airinv airrac airtsp rmol sevmgr trademgen
All those packages have been successfully rebuilt (after upstream upgrade):
* airinv: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-d6b3c81762
* airrac: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-bd268627aa
* ai
> On 31. 05. 20 17:09, Leigh Scott wrote:
>
> That's up to the maintainer. Seems reasonable to me.
Thanks, patch forwarded to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1792059
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send
On 31. 05. 20 17:09, Leigh Scott wrote:
On 31. 05. 20 12:49, Leigh Scott wrote:
Note that python-setproctitle already failed to built with Python 3.8 and the
"fix" was to comment out the tests:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-setproctitle/c/d6d9620c3c4fa076...
Hence, it built with Py
> On 31. 05. 20 12:49, Leigh Scott wrote:
>
> Note that python-setproctitle already failed to built with Python 3.8 and the
> "fix" was to comment out the tests:
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-setproctitle/c/d6d9620c3c4fa076...
>
> Hence, it built with Python 3.9 even if it doesn
On 29. 05. 20 21:59, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hello.
As you might already know, we have recently merged in the Python 3.9 side tag,
despite several builds have not succeeded. We always aim for some compromise
between having the side tag open for too long and having too many failures.
...
cinch
On 31. 05. 20 13:13, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 01:09:31PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 31. 05. 20 13:04, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 10:49:28AM -, Leigh Scott wrote:
Even if the package builds it doesn't mean it's functional.
On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 01:09:31PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 31. 05. 20 13:04, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 10:49:28AM -, Leigh Scott wrote:
> > > Even if the package builds it doesn't mean it's functional.
> > >
> > > $ cinnamon-settings
> > > Traceback
On 31. 05. 20 13:04, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 10:49:28AM -, Leigh Scott wrote:
Even if the package builds it doesn't mean it's functional.
$ cinnamon-settings
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/share/cinnamon/cinnamon-settings/cinnamon-setting
On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 10:49:28AM -, Leigh Scott wrote:
> Even if the package builds it doesn't mean it's functional.
>
> $ cinnamon-settings
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/usr/share/cinnamon/cinnamon-settings/cinnamon-settings.py", line 16,
> in
> from setproctitle imp
On 31. 05. 20 12:49, Leigh Scott wrote:
Hello.
As you might already know, we have recently merged in the Python 3.9 side tag,
despite several builds have not succeeded. We always aim for some compromise
between having the side tag open for too long and having too many failures.
The packages, wh
> Hello.
>
> As you might already know, we have recently merged in the Python 3.9 side
> tag,
> despite several builds have not succeeded. We always aim for some compromise
> between having the side tag open for too long and having too many failures.
>
> The packages, when not rebuilt, are not
On 30. 05. 20 11:56, Ján ONDREJ (SAL) wrote:
Ahoj,
Hey. I'll try to answer.
som trocha zmateny z tych hlaseni. Je skoda, ze bugzilla priamo neobsahuje
link na failed build.
The bugzillas don't contain the failed build link, because they are primarily
"fails to install" and not "fails to
On 5/29/20 1:59 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
orion Mayavi paraview python-AppTools python-Traits python-envisage
python-pyface python-scikit-image python-traitsui python-x2go
paraview was fixed by besser82 - build in progress (thanks!)
I've resolved the bootstrap loop between python-Traits and
On 30. 05. 20 1:17, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2020-05-29 at 21:59 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hello.
As you might already know, we have recently merged in the Python 3.9 side tag,
despite several builds have not succeeded. We always aim for some compromise
between having the side tag open f
On 30. 05. 20 9:18, Przemo Firszt wrote:
W dniu pią, 29.05.2020 o godzinie 23∶10 +0200, użytkownik Miro Hrončok
napisał:
[..]
When will python3 in the rawhide buildroot be 3.9?
It is.
Note that the component name is python3.9, but the binary package is
still
python3. The python3 component
On Fri, 2020-05-29 at 21:59 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> mlt martinkg sergiomb
I built mlt in opencv-4 side tag
--
Sérgio M. B.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists
Il giorno ven, 29/05/2020 alle 21.59 +0200, Miro Hrončok ha scritto:
> Hello.
Hello,
> As you might already know, we have recently merged in the Python 3.9
> side tag,
> despite several builds have not succeeded. We always aim for some
> compromise
> between having the side tag open for too long
Ahoj,
som trocha zmateny z tych hlaseni. Je skoda, ze bugzilla priamo neobsahuje
link na failed build. Musim si ho pohladat sam. Skusal som rebuildnut tak
ako si mi vravel, teda cez mock s konfiguraciou copr repo, ale neviem preco,
tak ten build zbehne teraz bez problemov. Ale ked dam build pria
W dniu pią, 29.05.2020 o godzinie 23∶10 +0200, użytkownik Miro Hrončok
napisał:
> [..]
> > >
> > When will python3 in the rawhide buildroot be 3.9?
>
> It is.
>
> Note that the component name is python3.9, but the binary package is
> still
> python3. The python3 component is retired.
>
Hi Miro
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 04:17:03PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> I fixed apsw and rebuilt calibre, which needed it. bugzilla2fedmsg
I looked at apsw also, but in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840234
the maintainer wanted to wait for a new release which is prepping
upstream.
Tha
On Fri, 2020-05-29 at 21:59 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hello.
>
> As you might already know, we have recently merged in the Python 3.9 side
> tag,
> despite several builds have not succeeded. We always aim for some compromise
> between having the side tag open for too long and having too many
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 09:59:27PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> coccinelle rjones
This one has a bug and an upstream fix already, I "just" have to apply it:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1791765#c10
The only possible problem is it seems to be bundling a Python library
whi
On 29. 05. 20 22:38, Gwyn Ciesla via devel wrote:
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Friday, May 29, 2020 2:59 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hello.
As you might already know, we have recently merged in the Python 3.9 side tag,
despite several builds have not succeeded. We always aim for some comp
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Friday, May 29, 2020 2:59 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hello.
>
> As you might already know, we have recently merged in the Python 3.9 side tag,
> despite several builds have not succeeded. We always aim for some compromise
> between having the side tag open f
I'm already working on updating freecad to work with VTK 9.0 and
hopefully nothing falls apart with Python 3.9 while I'm at it.
Thanks,
Richard
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedo
Hello.
As you might already know, we have recently merged in the Python 3.9 side tag,
despite several builds have not succeeded. We always aim for some compromise
between having the side tag open for too long and having too many failures.
The packages, when not rebuilt, are not installable in
31 matches
Mail list logo
