> "SM" == Sandro Mani writes:
SM> So just for curiosity, does the tooling allow an arbitrary name for
SM> the specfile and does it just pick the first one it finds when
SM> building the SRPM?
There is no one "tooling". fedpkg/pyrpkg will try to find the spec
named after the package and then
On 06.03.2017 17:09, Martin Bříza wrote:
On Mon, 06 Mar 2017 17:03:51 +0100, Sandro Mani
wrote:
Hi
I just came across a package (mingw-qt5-qtquickcontrols) whose
specfile isn't named .spec (in this case,
mingw-qtquickcontrols.spec instead of mingw-qt5-qtquickcontrols.spec).
As I unders
On Mon, 06 Mar 2017 17:03:51 +0100, Sandro Mani
wrote:
Hi
I just came across a package (mingw-qt5-qtquickcontrols) whose specfile
isn't named .spec (in this case, mingw-qtquickcontrols.spec
instead of mingw-qt5-qtquickcontrols.spec).
As I understand it this is against the guildelines?
Hi
I just came across a package (mingw-qt5-qtquickcontrols) whose specfile
isn't named .spec (in this case, mingw-qtquickcontrols.spec
instead of mingw-qt5-qtquickcontrols.spec).
As I understand it this is against the guildelines? (Shouldn't the build
actually fail?)
Can I just fix it by r
