On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 8:19 AM, Kalpa Welivitigoda wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It is compulsory that a package waiting to be reviewed, be submitted with
> the latest version in upstream?
It cannot be. the latest version upstream sometimes includes a major
and invompatible structure with the preivous major r
On 06/03/2013 02:33 PM, Kalpa Welivitigoda wrote:
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Matej Cepl mailto:mc...@redhat.com>> wrote:
On 2013-06-03, 12:19 GMT, Kalpa Welivitigoda wrote:
> It is compulsory that a package waiting to be reviewed, be submitted
> with the latest version in u
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 6:03 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On , Kalpa Welivitigoda wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> It is compulsory that a package waiting to be reviewed, be submitted
>> with the latest version in upstream?
>>
>
> Officially, it is a SHOULD (as pointed out by Volker), practically it is
> p
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Volker Fröhlich wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 17:49 +0530, Kalpa Welivitigoda wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > It is compulsory that a package waiting to be reviewed, be submitted
> > with the latest version in upstream?
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best Regards,
> >
> > Kalpa We
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Matej Cepl wrote:
> On 2013-06-03, 12:19 GMT, Kalpa Welivitigoda wrote:
> > It is compulsory that a package waiting to be reviewed, be submitted
> > with the latest version in upstream?
>
> Could you elaborate a bit on the particular situation? Why wouldn't you
> g
On , Kalpa Welivitigoda wrote:
Hi,
It is compulsory that a package waiting to be reviewed, be submitted
with the latest version in upstream?
Officially, it is a SHOULD (as pointed out by Volker), practically it is
pretty much consider as a MUST unless there is/are valid reason(s) not
to.
The
On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 17:49 +0530, Kalpa Welivitigoda wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> It is compulsory that a package waiting to be reviewed, be submitted
> with the latest version in upstream?
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
>
> Kalpa Welivitigoda
> Junior Treasurer | Electrical Engineering Society
> Undergradu
On 2013-06-03, 12:19 GMT, Kalpa Welivitigoda wrote:
> It is compulsory that a package waiting to be reviewed, be submitted
> with the latest version in upstream?
Could you elaborate a bit on the particular situation? Why wouldn't you
go with the latest upstream?
Best,
Matěj
--
devel mailing
Hi,
It is compulsory that a package waiting to be reviewed, be submitted with
the latest version in upstream?
--
Best Regards,
Kalpa Welivitigoda
Junior Treasurer | Electrical Engineering Society
Undergraduate | Department of Electrical Engineering
University of Moratuwa
Sri Lanka
http://about.
