On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 6:03 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon <pin...@pingoured.fr>wrote:
> On , Kalpa Welivitigoda wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> It is compulsory that a package waiting to be reviewed, be submitted >> with the latest version in upstream? >> > > Officially, it is a SHOULD (as pointed out by Volker), practically it is > pretty much consider as a MUST unless there is/are valid reason(s) not to. > The choice is then left up to the packager and the reviewer. > > Thanks for the explanation > But I'm Matej here, could you expand why you would not want the latest > version > from upstream? > > It's not that I don't want the latest version. I just asked to know how it is been practised so that it can help me in my reviews. > > Pierre > > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.**org/mailman/listinfo/devel<https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel> > -- Best Regards, Kalpa Welivitigoda Junior Treasurer | Electrical Engineering Society Undergraduate | Department of Electrical Engineering University of Moratuwa Sri Lanka http://about.me/callkalpa
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
