Hi Fabio,
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 02:32:13PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> - mcrouter-0:0.41.0.20220221-1.fc35 >
> mcrouter-0:0.41.0-8.20211222git90d63a3.fc36
> Snapshot versioning scheme format was changed on F35 only (!),
> resulting in an NVR downgrade (?).
>
Huh, somehow it got left off
htt
Il 28/03/22 18:14, Fabio Valentini ha scritto:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 6:06 PM Mattia Verga via devel
> wrote:
>> Il 28/03/22 16:19, Fabio Valentini ha scritto:
>>> Note that this list only includes *Version* downgrades.
>>>
>>> There's a few dozen more packages that are downgraded because of lo
On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 6:06 PM Mattia Verga via devel
wrote:
>
> Il 28/03/22 16:19, Fabio Valentini ha scritto:
> >
> > Note that this list only includes *Version* downgrades.
> >
> > There's a few dozen more packages that are downgraded because of lower
> > *Release* values, but I didn't yet hav
Il 28/03/22 16:19, Fabio Valentini ha scritto:
>
> Note that this list only includes *Version* downgrades.
>
> There's a few dozen more packages that are downgraded because of lower
> *Release* values, but I didn't yet have time to go through all those
> (some are probably caused by additional rpma
On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 9:19 AM Fabio Valentini
wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 5:51 PM Fabio Valentini
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 2:32 PM Fabio Valentini
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Yes, it's that time of the year again. Looks like it's not *that* bad
> > > this tim
On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 5:51 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 2:32 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Yes, it's that time of the year again. Looks like it's not *that* bad
> > this time round, but the fact that this keeps happening probably means
> > some of ou
V Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 12:56:18AM -0500, Bruno Wolff III napsal(a):
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 21:06:44 +0100,
> Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 8:57 PM Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> >
> > I don't really understand what you're saying here. Unless your update
> > is blocked by somet
On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 21:06:44 +0100,
Fabio Valentini wrote:
On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 8:57 PM Bruno Wolff III wrote:
I don't really understand what you're saying here. Unless your update
is blocked by something else that is not "stable" yet *and* you don't
(or cannot) use a buildroot overrid
On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 8:57 PM Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 10:58:17 -0700,
> Adam Williamson wrote:
> >On Thu, 2022-03-24 at 18:52 +0100, Ralf Corsépius wrote:
> >>
> >> > If it was the latter, I couldn't find it in your message. Sorry.
> >> It's actually quite simple: T
On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 10:58:17 -0700,
Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2022-03-24 at 18:52 +0100, Ralf Corsépius wrote:
> If it was the latter, I couldn't find it in your message. Sorry.
It's actually quite simple: There are dozens if not hundreds of unpushed
updates pending due to the releas
On Thu, 2022-03-24 at 18:52 +0100, Ralf Corsépius wrote:
>
> > If it was the latter, I couldn't find it in your message. Sorry.
> It's actually quite simple: There are dozens if not hundreds of unpushed
> updates pending due to the release freeze, which will be released at the
> very moment the
Am 24.03.22 um 18:07 schrieb Fabio Valentini:
On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 5:58 PM Ralf Corsépius wrote:
(...)
Oh noes, the list isn't really getting shorter ...
It's Fedora's old release management flaw ;)
As usual at these times of the release cycle, Fedora 36 is in deep
freeze, i.e. packag
On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 5:58 PM Ralf Corsépius wrote:
(...)
> > Oh noes, the list isn't really getting shorter ...
>
> It's Fedora's old release management flaw ;)
>
> As usual at these times of the release cycle, Fedora 36 is in deep
> freeze, i.e. package updates are not getting pushed, which
Am 24.03.22 um 17:51 schrieb Fabio Valentini:
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 2:32 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
Hi all,
Yes, it's that time of the year again. Looks like it's not *that* bad
this time round, but the fact that this keeps happening probably means
some of our processes are broken ... (or,
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 2:32 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Yes, it's that time of the year again. Looks like it's not *that* bad
> this time round, but the fact that this keeps happening probably means
> some of our processes are broken ... (or, since some usernames are
> attached to m
Fabio Valentini wrote on 2022/03/18 22:32:
Probably caused by F36FTBFS issues:
===
- cantor-0:21.12.2-1.fc35 > cantor-0:21.12.1-2.fc36
Version 21.12.2 seems to have failed to build on f36+, but was submitted to f35.
- julia-0:1.7.2-1.fc35 > julia-0:1.7.0.0-1.f
Hau idatzi du Fabio Valentini (decatho...@gmail.com) erabiltzaileak
(2022 mar. 18, or. (14:33)):
>
> Hi all,
>
> - gojq-0:0.12.7-1.fc35 > gojq-0:0.12.6-2.fc36
> Version 0.12.7 was built for F35+, but no bodhi update for F36 was submitted.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-6c128bd
Dne 18. 03. 22 v 14:32 Fabio Valentini napsal(a):
- The "I'm going to build this update for F34, F35, F37/Rawhide,
EPEL7, EPEL8, and EPEL9, but never wonder about the missing number
between F35 and F37" cases are almost funny. :)
This is missing "git pull" or "git fetch" after branching. So i
On Fri, 18 Mar 2022 14:32:13 +0100
Fabio Valentini wrote:
> "Forgotten" F36 updates:
>
>
...
>
> - perl-Net-DNS-0:1.33-1.fc35 > perl-Net-DNS-0:1.32-3.fc36
> Version 1.33 was built on F34, F35, F37 / Rawhide, but not F36.
Fixed:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FE
Hi all,
Yes, it's that time of the year again. Looks like it's not *that* bad
this time round, but the fact that this keeps happening probably means
some of our processes are broken ... (or, since some usernames are
attached to multiple entries in the list below, maybe it's just a lack
of understa
20 matches
Mail list logo
