Per today's FESCo meeting, we have orphaned tuxbrewr's packages.
Please take a look and see if any of the following are packages you
would like to become point of contact on and steward for the Fedora
collection:
rpms/acpi -- Command-line ACPI client ( master f23 f22 )
rpms/acpitool --
Kevin Fenzi writes:
> ...
> purple-plugin_pack -- A set of plugins for libpurple, pidgin, and finch (
> master f23 f22 )
Taken.
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, Red Hat
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.o
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016, at 12:45 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> pygobject3 -- Python 2 bindings for GObject Introspection ( master f23 f22 )
In practice this is mostly a mirror of upstream that has automatic commits
from kalev, but I'll take it as primary point of contact for any downstream
issues.
If
Due to several fesco tickets and bugzilla requests, there's a number of
packages in the last week that have become orphaned and need a new
point of contact if they want to stay in the package collection.
Please do look over these and see if you are interested in taking them
on:
poco: C++ class
On 10/01/2015 06:34 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-09-30 at 13:40 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> suitesparse (el5)
>> suitesparse (f21)
>> suitesparse (f22)
>> suitesparse (f23)
>> suitesparse (master)
>
> I checked - the package is orphaned, but it does have 3
> "administrators" - should I f
On Fri, 2 Oct 2015 00:01:11 +
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 06:53:35PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 08:46:57PM +, Zbigniew
> > Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > > >
> > > > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/linux_logo/5.
On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 06:53:35PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 08:46:57PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > >
> > > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/linux_logo/5.11/10.fc22/data/logs/x86_64/build.log
> > What about a Fedora logo?
>
> We need to
On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 08:46:57PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >
> > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/linux_logo/5.11/10.fc22/data/logs/x86_64/build.log
> What about a Fedora logo?
We need to ask Fedora Design for a trademark-approved ASCII art
version.
--
Matthe
On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 06:57:43PM +0100, Richard Fearn wrote:
> > Huh. Does this always default to Source Mage, or does it have
> > heuristics which are misfiring?
>
> Neither. The Fedora package is built using `make logos-all`, which
> means that all available logos are compiled in. The `find` c
Hi,
On Thursday, 01 October 2015 at 00:04, Christian Dersch wrote:
> I've taken yasm.
I'd like to co-maintain. It's essential for mplayer and ffmpeg over at
RPMFusion. Request for commit access submitted.
Regards,
--
Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann
RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.o
Hi,
On 09/30/2015 09:40 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> In today's FESCo meeting we marked 2 maintainers as no longer
> responsive and I have just orphaned the packages that they were point
> of contact on.
>
> Please take a look at this list and if you wish to become the point of
> contact for that pa
> Huh. Does this always default to Source Mage, or does it have
> heuristics which are misfiring?
Neither. The Fedora package is built using `make logos-all`, which
means that all available logos are compiled in. The `find` command is
used to find the logos, and C code for building a linked list o
On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 01:49:07PM +0200, Matthias Saou wrote:
> * linux_logo
Huh. Does this always default to Source Mage, or does it have
heuristics which are misfiring?
--
Matthew Miller
Fedora Project Leader
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject
On Wed, 2015-09-30 at 13:40 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> suitesparse (el5)
> suitesparse (f21)
> suitesparse (f22)
> suitesparse (f23)
> suitesparse (master)
I checked - the package is orphaned, but it does have 3
"administrators" - should I first check if any of them would like to
take over before
On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 15:31:13 -0600
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
[...]
> You do know you should be able to add yourself as co-maintainer and/or
> re-take point of contact (If you feel you have time to), right?
FWIW, I have re-taken ownership of 4 of my packages, which are ones
that I actually still use and
Am 2015-10-01 06:50, schrieb Michael Cronenworth:
On 09/30/2015 11:47 PM, Jens Lody wrote:
I want to take these theree, but they are still not official orphaned,
so I can not take ownership.
Should I just wait until the status changed in pkgdb ?
Those packages were orphaned but they were imme
2015-09-30 16:40 GMT-03:00 Kevin Fenzi :
> proftpd (el5)
> proftpd (el6)
> proftpd (epel7)
> proftpd (f21)
> proftpd (f22)
> proftpd (f23)
> proftpd (master)
I took proftpd all branches,
--
Itamar Reis Peixoto
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedora
On 09/30/2015 11:47 PM, Jens Lody wrote:
I want to take these theree, but they are still not official orphaned,
so I can not take ownership.
Should I just wait until the status changed in pkgdb ?
Those packages were orphaned but they were immediately picked up. Send a
message to the new POC t
Am Mittwoch, den 30.09.2015, 13:40 -0600 schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
> In today's FESCo meeting we marked 2 maintainers as no longer
> responsive and I have just orphaned the packages that they were point
> of contact on.
>
> Please take a look at this list and if you wish to become the point
> of
> con
On Qua, 2015-09-30 at 13:40 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> p7zip (el5)
> p7zip (el6)
> p7zip (epel7)
> p7zip (f21)
> p7zip (f22)
> p7zip (f23)
> p7zip (master)
I took it , I already had opened some bugzilla reports, I done some work
on this package .
I can take some more packages, if no one take it
I've taken yasm.
Greetings,
Christian
On 09/30/2015 09:40 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> In today's FESCo meeting we marked 2 maintainers as no longer
> responsive and I have just orphaned the packages that they were point
> of contact on.
>
> Please take a look at this list and if you wish to become
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 09/30/2015 03:40 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> htop (epel7) htop (f21) htop (f22) htop (f23) htop (master)
Taken htop.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJWDFqsAAoJEHE/1K3lyLxnCwoP/0BPh1OAekkWfY7JV975goJb
sMDvgV+UoAGxnveITX
On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 22:54:15 +0200
Matthias Saou wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Given the amount of notifications I just got... I'm one of the two
> maintainers :-/
Yeah, I meant to link the tickets, but I guess I failed. ;(
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1482
> Could someone from FESCo have at lea
* Kevin Fenzi [30/09/2015 13:40] :
>
> Please take a look at this list and if you wish to become the point of
> contact for that package do so in pkgdb.
> perl-Algorithm-FastPermute (master)
> perl-libintl (master)
I've taken these two packages on all their Fedora branches.
Emmanuel
--
devel ma
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 10:54:15PM +0200, Matthias Saou wrote:
> And sorry for all the trouble (two kids... some of you will
> understand for sure...).
I do indeed. Glad to hear from you! :)
--
Matthew Miller
Fedora Project Leader
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://adm
Hi,
Given the amount of notifications I just got... I'm one of the two
maintainers :-/
Could someone from FESCo have at least pinged me personally that this
was about to happen? I know that I've been wy too absent for the
last few years, my optimism about "getting back in the game" being a
bi
2015-09-30 15:40 GMT-04:00 Kevin Fenzi :
> In today's FESCo meeting we marked 2 maintainers as no longer
> responsive and I have just orphaned the packages that they were point
> of contact on.
>
> Please take a look at this list and if you wish to become the point of
> contact for that package do
2015-09-30 20:40 GMT+01:00 Kevin Fenzi :
> In today's FESCo meeting we marked 2 maintainers as no longer
> responsive and I have just orphaned the packages that they were point
> of contact on.
>
> Please take a look at this list and if you wish to become the point of
> contact for that package do
In today's FESCo meeting we marked 2 maintainers as no longer
responsive and I have just orphaned the packages that they were point
of contact on.
Please take a look at this list and if you wish to become the point of
contact for that package do so in pkgdb.
Thanks.
kevin
--
advancecomp (el5)
a
29 matches
Mail list logo
