On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:21:52PM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Mattia Verga
> wrote:
> >
> > And what about for pre-built binary files contained in source that are not
> > installed in the final rpm (ex. deleted in the %setup stage)? Should the
> > source be purge
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 18:53:16 +0100,
drago01 wrote:
>
> IANAL but I would call the odt "source code" and the pdf "binary" but
> just use the term "documentation" for either.
> It is not a binary in the sense of "compiled code".
The GPL requires you to to provide the preferred source code fo
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:21:52 -0500,
> Jon Ciesla wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Mattia Verga
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > And what about for pre-built binary files contained in source that are not
>> > installed in the final rpm
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:41 PM, Martin Erik Werner
wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 12:21 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Mattia Verga
>> wrote:
>> > Il 12/03/2012 13:33, Dennis Gilmore ha scritto:
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 08:19:38 -0400
>> >> Stephen Gallagh
On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 12:21 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Mattia Verga
> wrote:
> > Il 12/03/2012 13:33, Dennis Gilmore ha scritto:
> >>
> >> On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 08:19:38 -0400
> >> Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 13:01 +0100, Brendan Jone
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:21:52 -0500,
Jon Ciesla wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Mattia Verga
> wrote:
> >
> > And what about for pre-built binary files contained in source that are not
> > installed in the final rpm (ex. deleted in the %setup stage)? Should the
> > source be purg
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Mattia Verga wrote:
> Il 12/03/2012 13:33, Dennis Gilmore ha scritto:
>>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 08:19:38 -0400
>> Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 13:01 +0100, Brendan Jones wrote:
>
Il 12/03/2012 13:33, Dennis Gilmore ha scritto:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 08:19:38 -0400
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 13:01 +0100, Brendan Jones wrote:
On 03/12/2012 03:46 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
I checked in a tarball for egoboo
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 06:47:36 -0500,
Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> That really should be a releng ticket not an infrastructure one.
I have filed the following ticket for this issue:
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5124
Thanks.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 08:19:38 -0400
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 13:01 +0100, Brendan Jones wrote:
> > On 03/12/2012 03:46 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > > I checked in a tarball for egoboo that turned out to have a
> > > non-free
On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 13:01 +0100, Brendan Jones wrote:
> On 03/12/2012 03:46 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > I checked in a tarball for egoboo that turned out to have a non-free
> > (noncommercial restriction) font file in it. The tarball has only
> > been used for local builds (no scratch-builds).
On 03/12/2012 03:46 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
I checked in a tarball for egoboo that turned out to have a non-free
(noncommercial restriction) font file in it. The tarball has only
been used for local builds (no scratch-builds). Do I need to remove
this tarball from the lookaside cache? If so ho
That really should be a releng ticket not an infrastructure one.
--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 21:46:03 -0500
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> I checked in a tarball for egoboo that turned out to have a non-free
> (noncom
On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 21:46:03 -0500
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> I checked in a tarball for egoboo that turned out to have a non-free
> (noncommercial restriction) font file in it. The tarball has only
> been used for local builds (no scratch-builds). Do I need to remove
> this tarball from the lookas
I checked in a tarball for egoboo that turned out to have a non-free
(noncommercial restriction) font file in it. The tarball has only
been used for local builds (no scratch-builds). Do I need to remove
this tarball from the lookaside cache? If so how do I do it?
The hash is e6f3130695d297dcd9fe74e
15 matches
Mail list logo
