On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Bruno Wolff III <br...@wolff.to> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:21:52 -0500, > Jon Ciesla <limburg...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Mattia Verga <mattia.ve...@tiscali.it> >> wrote: >> > >> > And what about for pre-built binary files contained in source that are not >> > installed in the final rpm (ex. deleted in the %setup stage)? Should the >> > source be purged from those? >> >> If the licensing is such that they can't be redistributed, yes. > > Does that cover GPL binaries where we are sure we have the specific source > versions that correspond to the binaries? > > For example pdf files, which I suspect might have been created from odt > files, but I am not sure I can get the versions of the odt files that > match the included pdf files?
IANAL but I would call the odt "source code" and the pdf "binary" but just use the term "documentation" for either. It is not a binary in the sense of "compiled code". -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
