Re: Mass spec file change: Adding BuildRequires: make

2021-01-08 Thread Tom Stellard
On 11/30/20 2:06 PM, Tom Stellard wrote: Hi, As part of the f34 change request[1] for removing make from the buildroot, I will be doing a mass update of packages[2] to add BuildRequires: make where it is needed. If you are a package maintainer and would prefer to update your packages on you

Re: Mass spec file change: Adding BuildRequires: make

2021-01-06 Thread Tom Stellard
On 11/30/20 2:06 PM, Tom Stellard wrote: Hi, As part of the f34 change request[1] for removing make from the buildroot, I will be doing a mass update of packages[2] to add BuildRequires: make where it is needed. If you are a package maintainer and would prefer to update your packages on you

Re: Mass spec file change: Adding BuildRequires: make

2021-01-06 Thread Tom Stellard
On 11/30/20 2:06 PM, Tom Stellard wrote: Hi, As part of the f34 change request[1] for removing make from the buildroot, I will be doing a mass update of packages[2] to add BuildRequires: make where it is needed. If you are a package maintainer and would prefer to update your packages on you

Re: Mass spec file change: Adding BuildRequires: make

2021-01-05 Thread Tom Stellard
On 1/5/21 6:58 AM, Tom Stellard wrote: On 11/30/20 2:06 PM, Tom Stellard wrote: Hi, As part of the f34 change request[1] for removing make from the buildroot, I will be doing a mass update of packages[2] to add BuildRequires: make where it is needed. If you are a package maintainer and woul

Re: Mass spec file change: Adding BuildRequires: make

2021-01-05 Thread Tom Stellard
On 11/30/20 2:06 PM, Tom Stellard wrote: Hi, As part of the f34 change request[1] for removing make from the buildroot, I will be doing a mass update of packages[2] to add BuildRequires: make where it is needed. If you are a package maintainer and would prefer to update your packages on you

Re: Mass spec file change: Adding BuildRequires: make

2021-01-04 Thread Tom Stellard
On 11/30/20 2:06 PM, Tom Stellard wrote: Hi, As part of the f34 change request[1] for removing make from the buildroot, I will be doing a mass update of packages[2] to add BuildRequires: make where it is needed. If you are a package maintainer and would prefer to update your packages on you

Re: Mass spec file change: Adding BuildRequires: make

2020-12-18 Thread Tom Stellard
On 11/30/20 2:06 PM, Tom Stellard wrote: Hi, As part of the f34 change request[1] for removing make from the buildroot, I will be doing a mass update of packages[2] to add BuildRequires: make where it is needed. If you are a package maintainer and would prefer to update your packages on you

Re: Mass spec file change: Adding BuildRequires: make

2020-12-16 Thread José Abílio Matos
On Wednesday, December 16, 2020 3:51:16 PM WET Tom Stellard wrote: > I'm only excluding packages that invoke make through the %cmake_build or > %cmake_install macros. armadillo invokes make directly, which is why it > is on the list. > > -Tom You are right, in the %check section. OK I have adde

Re: Mass spec file change: Adding BuildRequires: make

2020-12-16 Thread Tom Stellard
On 12/16/20 12:51 AM, José Abílio Matos wrote: On Wednesday, December 16, 2020 8:01:23 AM WET Tom Stellard wrote: > Here is the list of packages for Dec 16: > https://fedorapeople.org/~tstellar/br_make_day2.txt > > -Tom Hi Tom,   I have two packages in your list: armadillo and emacs-c

Re: Mass spec file change: Adding BuildRequires: make

2020-12-16 Thread José Abílio Matos
On Wednesday, December 16, 2020 8:01:23 AM WET Tom Stellard wrote: > Here is the list of packages for Dec 16: > https://fedorapeople.org/~tstellar/br_make_day2.txt > > -Tom Hi Tom, I have two packages in your list: armadillo and emacs-common-ess. My issue is with armadillo that it has BuildReq

Re: Mass spec file change: Adding BuildRequires: make

2020-12-16 Thread Tom Stellard
On 11/30/20 2:06 PM, Tom Stellard wrote: Hi, As part of the f34 change request[1] for removing make from the buildroot, I will be doing a mass update of packages[2] to add BuildRequires: make where it is needed. If you are a package maintainer and would prefer to update your packages on you

Re: Mass spec file change: Adding BuildRequires: make

2020-12-14 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
Hi! On Saturday, 12 December 2020 at 08:24, Tom Stellard wrote: [...] > The 50 packages I'll update on Dec. 14 are listed here: > > https://fedorapeople.org/~tstellar/br_make_day1.txt abcde abook fixed, you can drop them from your list. Regards, Dominik -- Fedora https://getfedora.org | R

Re: Mass spec file change: Adding BuildRequires: make

2020-12-11 Thread Tom Stellard
On 11/30/20 2:06 PM, Tom Stellard wrote: Hi, As part of the f34 change request[1] for removing make from the buildroot, I will be doing a mass update of packages[2] to add BuildRequires: make where it is needed. If you are a package maintainer and would prefer to update your packages on you

Re: Mass spec file change: Adding BuildRequires: make

2020-12-07 Thread Dan Čermák
Hi Tom, Tom Stellard writes: > On 11/30/20 2:06 PM, Tom Stellard wrote: >> Hi, >> >> As part of the f34 change request[1] for removing make from the >> buildroot, I will be doing a mass update of packages[2] to add >> BuildRequires: make where it is needed. >> >> If you are a package maintai

Re: Mass spec file change: Adding BuildRequires: make

2020-12-07 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 12/7/20 7:33 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 12/7/20 7:18 PM, Tom Stellard wrote: I've updated the package list now[2] to reflect the %cmake_build change, I see for example libsavitar on the list. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libsavitar/blob/master/f/libsavitar.spec It only uses %cmake_.

Re: Mass spec file change: Adding BuildRequires: make

2020-12-07 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
On 07.12.2020 19:18, Tom Stellard wrote: I have also eliminated some (but not all) of the false positives that have been reported on the list.  I'm still working on getting rid of the rest of them. Please check the purple-plugin_pack package. It uses the meson build system. -- Sincerely, Vi

Re: Mass spec file change: Adding BuildRequires: make

2020-12-07 Thread Tom Stellard
On 12/7/20 10:33 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 12/7/20 7:18 PM, Tom Stellard wrote: I've updated the package list now[2] to reflect the %cmake_build change, I see for example libsavitar on the list. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libsavitar/blob/master/f/libsavitar.spec It only uses %cmake_

Re: Mass spec file change: Adding BuildRequires: make

2020-12-07 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 12/7/20 7:18 PM, Tom Stellard wrote: I've updated the package list now[2] to reflect the %cmake_build change, I see for example libsavitar on the list. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libsavitar/blob/master/f/libsavitar.spec It only uses %cmake_... macros. Was it indeed updated correct

Re: Mass spec file change: Adding BuildRequires: make

2020-12-07 Thread Tom Stellard
On 11/30/20 2:06 PM, Tom Stellard wrote: Hi, As part of the f34 change request[1] for removing make from the buildroot, I will be doing a mass update of packages[2] to add BuildRequires: make where it is needed. If you are a package maintainer and would prefer to update your packages on you

Re: Mass spec file change: Adding BuildRequires: make

2020-12-04 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 12/4/20 5:51 PM, Tom Stellard wrote: On 12/4/20 4:55 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 12/3/20 6:27 PM, Tom Stellard wrote: However, in the discussion on the mailing list for this change, not everyone agreed that cmake should Require make and this point was never resolved.  So, since there is stil

Re: Mass spec file change: Adding BuildRequires: make

2020-12-04 Thread Tom Stellard
On 12/4/20 4:55 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 12/3/20 6:27 PM, Tom Stellard wrote: However, in the discussion on the mailing list for this change, not everyone agreed that cmake should Require make and this point was never resolved.  So, since there is still ambiguity here, I am planning to do th

Re: Mass spec file change: Adding BuildRequires: make

2020-12-04 Thread Ian McInerney
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 4:21 PM Gary Buhrmaster wrote: > On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 12:55 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > For what's it worth I think that packages that only use make via cmake > should > > not have an explcit dependency on make. Packages that use make directly > should > > have an expli

Re: Mass spec file change: Adding BuildRequires: make

2020-12-04 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Friday, 04 December 2020 at 17:20, Gary Buhrmaster wrote: > On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 12:55 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > For what's it worth I think that packages that only use make via cmake > > should > > not have an explcit dependency on make. Packages that use make directly > > should > > h

Re: Mass spec file change: Adding BuildRequires: make

2020-12-04 Thread Richard Shaw
On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 10:22 AM Gary Buhrmaster wrote: > On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 3:39 PM Fabio Valentini > wrote: > > > I still think a lot of those are "false positives". > > CMake has a hard Requires on make, so if I BuildRequires cmake, adding > > "BuildRequires: make" is just redundant. > > h

Re: Mass spec file change: Adding BuildRequires: make

2020-12-04 Thread Gary Buhrmaster
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 12:55 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > For what's it worth I think that packages that only use make via cmake should > not have an explcit dependency on make. Packages that use make directly should > have an explicit dependency on make (even if they already BR cmake). Does that me

Re: Mass spec file change: Adding BuildRequires: make

2020-12-04 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 12/3/20 6:27 PM, Tom Stellard wrote: However, in the discussion on the mailing list for this change, not everyone agreed that cmake should Require make and this point was never resolved.  So, since there is still ambiguity here, I am planning to do the safest option, which is to add BuildReq

Re: Mass spec file change: Adding BuildRequires: make

2020-12-04 Thread Panu Matilainen
On 12/3/20 7:27 PM, Tom Stellard wrote: On 12/3/20 8:32 AM, Fabio Valentini wrote: On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 5:17 PM Tom Stellard wrote: On 12/3/20 7:39 AM, Fabio Valentini wrote: On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 4:35 PM Tom Stellard wrote: On 12/2/20 5:45 AM, Artem Tim wrote: How to quickly retest pa

Re: Mass spec file change: Adding BuildRequires: make

2020-12-03 Thread Tom Stellard
On 12/3/20 8:32 AM, Fabio Valentini wrote: On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 5:17 PM Tom Stellard wrote: On 12/3/20 7:39 AM, Fabio Valentini wrote: On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 4:35 PM Tom Stellard wrote: On 12/2/20 5:45 AM, Artem Tim wrote: How to quickly retest packages which listed here https://fedora

Re: Mass spec file change: Adding BuildRequires: make

2020-12-03 Thread ycollette . nospam
uild tools used by the %cmake macro. - Mail original - De: "Fabio Valentini" À: "Development discussions related to Fedora" Envoyé: Jeudi 3 Décembre 2020 17:32:24 Objet: Re: Mass spec file change: Adding BuildRequires: make On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 5:17 PM Tom Stellard

Re: Mass spec file change: Adding BuildRequires: make

2020-12-03 Thread Tom Hughes via devel
On 03/12/2020 16:21, Gary Buhrmaster wrote: On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 3:39 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: I still think a lot of those are "false positives". CMake has a hard Requires on make, so if I BuildRequires cmake, adding "BuildRequires: make" is just redundant. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rp

Re: Mass spec file change: Adding BuildRequires: make

2020-12-03 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 5:17 PM Tom Stellard wrote: > > On 12/3/20 7:39 AM, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 4:35 PM Tom Stellard wrote: > >> > >> On 12/2/20 5:45 AM, Artem Tim wrote: > >>> How to quickly retest packages which listed here > >>> https://fedorapeople.org/~tstellar/

Re: Mass spec file change: Adding BuildRequires: make

2020-12-03 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 at 11:18, Tom Stellard wrote: > On 12/3/20 7:39 AM, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 4:35 PM Tom Stellard wrote: > >> > >> On 12/2/20 5:45 AM, Artem Tim wrote: > >>> How to quickly retest packages which listed here > https://fedorapeople.org/~tstellar/needs_br

Re: Mass spec file change: Adding BuildRequires: make

2020-12-03 Thread Gary Buhrmaster
On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 3:39 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > I still think a lot of those are "false positives". > CMake has a hard Requires on make, so if I BuildRequires cmake, adding > "BuildRequires: make" is just redundant. > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/cmake/blob/master/f/cmake.spec#_185

Re: Mass spec file change: Adding BuildRequires: make

2020-12-03 Thread Tom Stellard
On 12/3/20 7:39 AM, Fabio Valentini wrote: On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 4:35 PM Tom Stellard wrote: On 12/2/20 5:45 AM, Artem Tim wrote: How to quickly retest packages which listed here https://fedorapeople.org/~tstellar/needs_br_make_packages.txt? I've tested few locally and in Koji Rawhide scra

Re: Mass spec file change: Adding BuildRequires: make

2020-12-03 Thread Tom Hughes via devel
On 03/12/2020 15:39, Fabio Valentini wrote: On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 4:35 PM Tom Stellard wrote: On 12/2/20 5:45 AM, Artem Tim wrote: How to quickly retest packages which listed here https://fedorapeople.org/~tstellar/needs_br_make_packages.txt? I've tested few locally and in Koji Rawhide scr

Re: Mass spec file change: Adding BuildRequires: make

2020-12-03 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 4:35 PM Tom Stellard wrote: > > On 12/2/20 5:45 AM, Artem Tim wrote: > > How to quickly retest packages which listed here > > https://fedorapeople.org/~tstellar/needs_br_make_packages.txt? I've tested > > few locally and in Koji Rawhide scratch, but they are compiled fine.

Re: Mass spec file change: Adding BuildRequires: make

2020-12-03 Thread Tom Stellard
On 12/2/20 5:45 AM, Artem Tim wrote: How to quickly retest packages which listed here https://fedorapeople.org/~tstellar/needs_br_make_packages.txt? I've tested few locally and in Koji Rawhide scratch, but they are compiled fine. ___ If the packages use make and they BuildRequire: make then t

Re: Mass spec file change: Adding BuildRequires: make

2020-12-03 Thread Tom Stellard
On 12/2/20 2:37 AM, Mark Wielaard wrote: Hi Tom, On Mon, 2020-11-30 at 14:06 -0800, Tom Stellard wrote: As part of the f34 change request[1] for removing make from the buildroot, I will be doing a mass update of packages[2] to add BuildRequires: make where it is needed. As part of a previous

Re: Mass spec file change: Adding BuildRequires: make

2020-12-02 Thread Artem Tim
How to quickly retest packages which listed here https://fedorapeople.org/~tstellar/needs_br_make_packages.txt? I've tested few locally and in Koji Rawhide scratch, but they are compiled fine. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To u

Re: Mass spec file change: Adding BuildRequires: make

2020-12-02 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi Tom, On Mon, 2020-11-30 at 14:06 -0800, Tom Stellard wrote: > As part of the f34 change request[1] for removing make from the > buildroot, I will be doing a mass update of packages[2] to add > BuildRequires: make where it is needed. As part of a previous change request [1] various packages w

Re: Mass spec file change: Adding BuildRequires: make

2020-12-02 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 01. 12. 20 v 19:35 Tom Stellard napsal(a): On 12/1/20 8:33 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 01. 12. 20 v 13:56 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a): On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 01:20:33PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 01. 12. 20 v 2:37 Tom Stellard napsal(a): False positive because they use gcc

Re: Mass spec file change: Adding BuildRequires: make

2020-12-01 Thread Petr Šabata
On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 7:38 PM Tom Stellard wrote: > > On 12/1/20 8:33 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > > Dne 01. 12. 20 v 13:56 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a): > >> On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 01:20:33PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > >>> Dne 01. 12. 20 v 2:37 Tom Stellard napsal(a): > False pos

Re: Mass spec file change: Adding BuildRequires: make

2020-12-01 Thread Michael Cronenworth
On 11/30/20 4:06 PM, Tom Stellard wrote: As part of the f34 change request[1] for removing make from the buildroot, I will be doing a mass update of packages[2] to add BuildRequires: make where it is needed. If you are a package maintainer and would prefer to update your packages on your own,

Re: Mass spec file change: Adding BuildRequires: make

2020-12-01 Thread Tom Stellard
On 12/1/20 8:33 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 01. 12. 20 v 13:56 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a): On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 01:20:33PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 01. 12. 20 v 2:37 Tom Stellard napsal(a): False positive because they use gcc which was crashing due to the (at the time) missi

Re: Mass spec file change: Adding BuildRequires: make

2020-12-01 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 01. 12. 20 v 13:56 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a): On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 01:20:33PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 01. 12. 20 v 2:37 Tom Stellard napsal(a): False positive because they use gcc which was crashing due to the (at the time) missing make dependency. Are these packages m

Re: Mass spec file change: Adding BuildRequires: make

2020-12-01 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 03:41:59PM +0100, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > On Tuesday, December 1, 2020 1:49:59 PM CET Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 01:20:33PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > > > > Dne 01. 12. 20 v 2:37 Tom Stellard napsal(a): > > > > > > > > False positive because th

Re: Mass spec file change: Adding BuildRequires: make

2020-12-01 Thread Remi Collet
Hi, Le 30/11/2020 à 23:06, Tom Stellard a écrit : If you are a package maintainer and would prefer to update your packages on your own, please do so before Dec 14, which is when I will begin doing the mass update. php is done. For all php-*, as they require "php-devel" which requires "make"

Re: Mass spec file change: Adding BuildRequires: make

2020-12-01 Thread Pavel Raiskup
On Tuesday, December 1, 2020 1:49:59 PM CET Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 01:20:33PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > > Dne 01. 12. 20 v 2:37 Tom Stellard napsal(a): > > > > > > False positive because they use gcc which was crashing due to the (at > > > the time) missing make dep

Re: Mass spec file change: Adding BuildRequires: make

2020-12-01 Thread Miroslav Suchý
Dne 30. 11. 20 v 23:06 Tom Stellard napsal(a): > > If you are a package maintainer and would prefer to update your packages on > your own, please do so before Dec 14, which > is when I will begin doing the mass update. python-satyr is false positive as it is EPEL only package > abrt abrt-java-c

Re: Mass spec file change: Adding BuildRequires: make

2020-12-01 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
On 30.11.2020 23:06, Tom Stellard wrote: aircrack-ng argyllcms aseman-qt-tools earlyoom foo2zjs ghostwriter git-subrepo goldendict hashcat ht kiwix-desktop lcms pidgin-groupchat-typing-notifications pidgin-toobars purple-discord purple-hangouts purple-libsteam purple-matrix purple-skypeweb qr-

Re: Mass spec file change: Adding BuildRequires: make

2020-12-01 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 01:20:33PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Dne 01. 12. 20 v 2:37 Tom Stellard napsal(a): > > > >False positive because they use gcc which was crashing due to the > >(at the time) missing make dependency. Are these packages missing > >BuildRequires: gcc ? > > > > > > Do I und

Re: Mass spec file change: Adding BuildRequires: make

2020-12-01 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 01:20:33PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Dne 01. 12. 20 v 2:37 Tom Stellard napsal(a): > > > > False positive because they use gcc which was crashing due to the (at > > the time) missing make dependency. Are these packages missing > > BuildRequires: gcc ? > > > > > > D

Re: Mass spec file change: Adding BuildRequires: make

2020-12-01 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 01. 12. 20 v 2:37 Tom Stellard napsal(a): False positive because they use gcc which was crashing due to the (at the time) missing make dependency. Are these packages missing BuildRequires: gcc ? Do I understand correctly, that gcc requires make [0]? Therefore at this stage, it should

Re: Mass spec file change: Adding BuildRequires: make

2020-12-01 Thread Petr Šabata
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 11:10 PM Tom Stellard wrote: > If you are a package maintainer and would prefer to update your packages > on your own, please do so before Dec 14, which is when I will begin > doing the mass update. Checking packages linked to my name... pamix: only calls %cmake macros, B

Re: Mass spec file change: Adding BuildRequires: make

2020-11-30 Thread Jerry James
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 6:37 PM Tom Stellard wrote: > On 11/30/20 2:20 PM, Jerry James wrote: > > ocaml-lablgtk3 > > ocaml-mlmpfr > > ocaml-zmq > > ocaml-ppxlib > > False positive because they use gcc which was crashing due to the (at > the time) missing make dependency. Are these packages missi

Re: Mass spec file change: Adding BuildRequires: make

2020-11-30 Thread Tom Stellard
On 11/30/20 2:20 PM, Jerry James wrote: On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 3:07 PM Tom Stellard wrote: As part of the f34 change request[1] for removing make from the buildroot, I will be doing a mass update of packages[2] to add BuildRequires: make where it is needed. The packages listed for jjames hav

Re: Mass spec file change: Adding BuildRequires: make

2020-11-30 Thread Tom Stellard
On 11/30/20 4:06 PM, Tom Hughes via devel wrote: On 30/11/2020 23:14, Christoph Junghans wrote: On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 4:05 PM Tom Hughes via devel wrote: On 30/11/2020 22:06, Tom Stellard wrote: As part of the f34 change request[1] for removing make from the buildroot, I will be doing a m

Re: Mass spec file change: Adding BuildRequires: make

2020-11-30 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 1:06 AM Tom Hughes via devel wrote: > > On 30/11/2020 23:14, Christoph Junghans wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 4:05 PM Tom Hughes via devel > > wrote: > >> > >> On 30/11/2020 22:06, Tom Stellard wrote: > >> > >>> As part of the f34 change request[1] for removing make fr

Re: Mass spec file change: Adding BuildRequires: make

2020-11-30 Thread Tom Hughes via devel
On 30/11/2020 23:14, Christoph Junghans wrote: On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 4:05 PM Tom Hughes via devel wrote: On 30/11/2020 22:06, Tom Stellard wrote: As part of the f34 change request[1] for removing make from the buildroot, I will be doing a mass update of packages[2] to add BuildRequires: ma

Re: Mass spec file change: Adding BuildRequires: make

2020-11-30 Thread Christoph Junghans
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 4:05 PM Tom Hughes via devel wrote: > > On 30/11/2020 22:06, Tom Stellard wrote: > > > As part of the f34 change request[1] for removing make from the > > buildroot, I will be doing a mass update of packages[2] to add > > BuildRequires: make where it is needed. > > What hap

Re: Mass spec file change: Adding BuildRequires: make

2020-11-30 Thread Tom Hughes via devel
On 30/11/2020 22:06, Tom Stellard wrote: As part of the f34 change request[1] for removing make from the buildroot, I will be doing a mass update of packages[2] to add BuildRequires: make where it is needed. What happened to excluding packages which use cmake? Tom -- Tom Hughes (t...@compto

Re: Mass spec file change: Adding BuildRequires: make

2020-11-30 Thread Iñaki Ucar
On Mon, 30 Nov 2020 at 23:16, Tom Stellard wrote: > > Hi, > > As part of the f34 change request[1] for removing make from the > buildroot, I will be doing a mass update of packages[2] to add > BuildRequires: make where it is needed. Packages listed for iucar, done. -- Iñaki Úcar ___

Re: Mass spec file change: Adding BuildRequires: make

2020-11-30 Thread Tom Stellard
On 11/30/20 2:31 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: Dne 30. 11. 20 v 23:06 Tom Stellard napsal(a): I will be doing the updates in batches, so that if there is a mistake the impact will be limited. You mean: create PRs is src.fedoraproject.org? No, I will be committing to dist-git directly and not

Re: Mass spec file change: Adding BuildRequires: make

2020-11-30 Thread Miroslav Suchý
Dne 30. 11. 20 v 23:06 Tom Stellard napsal(a): > I will be doing the updates in batches, so that if there is a mistake the > impact will be limited. You mean: create PRs is src.fedoraproject.org? -- Miroslav Suchy, RHCA Red Hat, Associate Manager ABRT/Copr, #brno, #fedora-buildsys

Re: Mass spec file change: Adding BuildRequires: make

2020-11-30 Thread Jerry James
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 3:07 PM Tom Stellard wrote: > As part of the f34 change request[1] for removing make from the > buildroot, I will be doing a mass update of packages[2] to add > BuildRequires: make where it is needed. The packages listed for jjames have all been done, except for these. The

Mass spec file change: Adding BuildRequires: make

2020-11-30 Thread Tom Stellard
Hi, As part of the f34 change request[1] for removing make from the buildroot, I will be doing a mass update of packages[2] to add BuildRequires: make where it is needed. If you are a package maintainer and would prefer to update your packages on your own, please do so before Dec 14, which i