On Sat, 28 Nov 2015 10:19:06 +0100
Pavel Zhukov wrote:
> Before I didn't see links to deleted files at all and it was fine.
> Now there are links and misleading message.
Theres an issue around one of the files mock/koji now outputs not being
removed by garbage collection, so the directory it's i
27.11.2015, 19:55, "Kevin Fenzi" :
> On Fri, 27 Nov 2015 17:26:15 +0100
> Pavel Zhukov wrote:
>
>> Hi.
>>
>> I've opened koji after some time and found new features:
>> - It's not possible to download scratch built packages (You don't
>> have permission to
>> access /work/tasks/9935/1162993
On Fri, 27 Nov 2015 17:26:15 +0100
Pavel Zhukov wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I've opened koji after some time and found new features:
> - It's not possible to download scratch built packages (You don't
> have permission to
> access /work/tasks/9935/11629935/nanomsg-0.7-0.1.beta.fc24.src.rpm on
> this server
Hi.
I've opened koji after some time and found new features:
- It's not possible to download scratch built packages (You don't have
permission to access
/work/tasks/9935/11629935/nanomsg-0.7-0.1.beta.fc24.src.rpm on this server)
- src.rpm is hidden somewhere under first (and only first) subtask
On 02/01/2012 10:57 PM, Tom Callaway wrote:
> On 02/01/2012 12:24 PM, Jerry James wrote:
>> Yes, the buildroots are both fine now. Thanks for fixing them. I was
>> just responding to spot's apparent surprise that an updated libvpx in
>> the buildroot should have broken package building for other
On 02/01/2012 12:24 PM, Jerry James wrote:
> Yes, the buildroots are both fine now. Thanks for fixing them. I was
> just responding to spot's apparent surprise that an updated libvpx in
> the buildroot should have broken package building for other people.
Indeed, I'm a little horrified at how de
On Wed, 2012-02-01 at 18:45 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > The only way is to revert the usrmove commit, then make your
> > change/build.
>
> Actually, last I checked, it was possible to create a git branch off the
> last commit before the stuff you don't want (i.e. the last
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> The only way is to revert the usrmove commit, then make your
> change/build.
Actually, last I checked, it was possible to create a git branch off the
last commit before the stuff you don't want (i.e. the last commit before the
usrmove commit in this case) and then build from
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Jerry James wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Tom Callaway
>> wrote:
>>> No, because xulrunner needs it to rebuild. Why is libvpx breaking
>>> package builds? Almost nothing should depend on it. The plan is for the
>>> libvpx update
Jerry James wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Tom Callaway
> wrote:
>> No, because xulrunner needs it to rebuild. Why is libvpx breaking
>> package builds? Almost nothing should depend on it. The plan is for the
>> libvpx update to go out at the same time as the xulrunner update.
>
> So
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 14:19:14 -0800,
Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> AIUI, at this point you're stuck either reverting the /usr move
> modifications in nss-softokn and building for Rawhide, or waiting until
> we push the /usr move packages into Rawhide proper...
What about untagging the current
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:00:21 -0500
Tom Callaway wrote:
> No, xulrunner failed because I need to patch nss-softokn to fix a bug
> in rawhide, but nss-softokn has already been modified for /usr move
> and I wasn't sure how to actually push the fix out into rawhide. If
> someone can advise me here,
On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 17:00 -0500, Tom Callaway wrote:
> On 01/31/2012 04:52 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 15:03 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 13:01:28 -0800,
> >> Adam Williamson wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I just noticed that, for some reason, I can c
On 01/31/2012 04:52 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 15:03 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 13:01:28 -0800,
>> Adam Williamson wrote:
>>>
>>> I just noticed that, for some reason, I can compose a live image if I
>>> just use regular Rawhide repos, but if
On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 15:03 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 13:01:28 -0800,
> Adam Williamson wrote:
> >
> > I just noticed that, for some reason, I can compose a live image if I
> > just use regular Rawhide repos, but if I add the /usr move repo, I get
> > this compose
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 13:01:28 -0800,
Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> I just noticed that, for some reason, I can compose a live image if I
> just use regular Rawhide repos, but if I add the /usr move repo, I get
> this compose error:
>
> Error creating Live CD : Failed to build transaction :
> x
On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 14:42 -0500, Tom Callaway wrote:
> On 01/31/2012 11:39 AM, Jerry James wrote:
> > However, the new libvpx is *still* in the Fedora 16 build root
> > overrides, which is breaking package builds. Spot, if you're done
> > rebuilding gstreamer-plugins-bad-free, could you expire t
On 01/31/2012 11:39 AM, Jerry James wrote:
> However, the new libvpx is *still* in the Fedora 16 build root
> overrides, which is breaking package builds. Spot, if you're done
> rebuilding gstreamer-plugins-bad-free, could you expire that override,
> please?
No, because xulrunner needs it to rebu
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Mattia Verga wrote:
> I see I didn't thought to look at root.log. So I will wait some day to
> retry the build.
> Thanks for the tip!
You shouldn't have to wait, for Rawhide at least. The fixed package
is in the build root now. My rebuild that was similarly
Il 31/01/2012 17:39, Jerry James ha scritto:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Mattia Verga wrote:
Hello all,
Is there any problem with koji in these days?
I'm getting random koji problems while building packages like
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=3748927&name=
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Mattia Verga wrote:
> Hello all,
> Is there any problem with koji in these days?
> I'm getting random koji problems while building packages like
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=3748927&name=build.log
>
> Yesterday
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:32:05 +0100, MV (Mattia) wrote:
> Hello all,
> Is there any problem with koji in these days?
> I'm getting random koji problems while building packages like
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=3748927&name=build.log
>
> Yest
Hello all,
Is there any problem with koji in these days?
I'm getting random koji problems while building packages like
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=3748927&name=build.log
Yesterday was the same, however today, just a couple of minutes before
the error I posted i
On 10/20/2010 02:24 PM, Paul F. Johnson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm still trying to get to the bottom as to why mono is failing to build
> on koji as either a scratch build or as a live build and I've come
> across this on the x86 build - can anyone shed any light on it as it's
> about as useful an error
"Paul F. Johnson" writes:
> Hi,
>
> I'm still trying to get to the bottom as to why mono is failing to build
> on koji as either a scratch build or as a live build and I've come
> across this on the x86 build - can anyone shed any light on it as it's
> about as useful an error throw back as 4/10
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 07:24:05PM +0100, Paul F. Johnson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm still trying to get to the bottom as to why mono is failing to build
> on koji as either a scratch build or as a live build and I've come
> across this on the x86 build - can anyone shed any light on it as it's
> about
Hi,
I'm still trying to get to the bottom as to why mono is failing to build
on koji as either a scratch build or as a live build and I've come
across this on the x86 build - can anyone shed any light on it as it's
about as useful an error throw back as 4/10 was back on the ZX81!
make[3]: *** [li
27 matches
Mail list logo
