On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 02:52:59PM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 17/09/2021 11:48, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > Is upstream wrong? Otherwise there shouldn't be anything to take care
> > of?
>
> I think that even minor changes in ABI need a soversion bump.
>
> Upstream developers decid
On 17/09/2021 11:48, Florian Weimer wrote:
Is upstream wrong? Otherwise there shouldn't be anything to take care
of?
I think that even minor changes in ABI need a soversion bump.
Upstream developers decided to hide internal symbols from ELF/DLL export
tables. I agree that these symbols are p
* Vitaly Zaitsev via devel:
> Hello.
>
> libolm 3.2.6 introduces ABI changes without a SOVERSION bump.
>
> Upstream's answer:
>
>> The purpose of bumping the SOVERSION is so that things that are
>> compiled against it don't suddenly break. If we're removing things
>> that nobody is using (and nobo
Hello.
libolm 3.2.6 introduces ABI changes without a SOVERSION bump.
Upstream's answer:
The purpose of bumping the SOVERSION is so that things that are compiled
against it don't suddenly break. If we're removing things that nobody is using
(and nobody should ever have used, and people would
