Re: Inactive packages removed from packager group

2023-11-19 Thread Davide Cavalca
On 2023-11-19 10:34, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Sun, Nov 19, 2023 at 08:33:02AM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: rpms/libldm I thought I was already doing this one, since I semi-maintain it upstream already. I'd like to comaintainer it, but I totally can't find the right button in the U

Re: Inactive packages removed from packager group

2023-11-19 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 08:27:47AM +1100, Arthur G wrote: > I recall a number of years back a proposed gcc upgrade broke many builds. > This required most maintainers to log in and refactor their source code > against the new gcc (and new gcc options). > > I hadn't logged into Fedora for years how

Re: Inactive packages removed from packager group

2023-11-19 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sun, Nov 19, 2023 at 06:34:39PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Sun, Nov 19, 2023 at 08:33:02AM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > > rpms/cairo > > rpms/createrepo_c > > rpms/desktop-backgrounds > > rpms/ed > > rpms/libcap > > rpms/vim > > Just noting that these packages seem to be ve

Re: Inactive packages removed from packager group

2023-11-19 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Mon, 2023-11-20 at 08:27 +1100, Arthur G wrote: > I recall a number of years back a proposed gcc upgrade broke many > builds. This required most maintainers to log in and refactor their > source code against the new gcc (and new gcc options). > > I hadn't logged into Fedora for years however I

Re: Inactive packages removed from packager group

2023-11-19 Thread Arthur G
I recall a number of years back a proposed gcc upgrade broke many builds. This required most maintainers to log in and refactor their source code against the new gcc (and new gcc options). I hadn't logged into Fedora for years however I did do my due diligence and rather quickly logged in and fixe

Re: Inactive packages removed from packager group

2023-11-19 Thread JT
On Sun, Nov 19, 2023 at 1:35 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Sun, Nov 19, 2023 at 08:33:02AM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > > rpms/cairo > > rpms/createrepo_c > > rpms/desktop-backgrounds > > rpms/ed > > rpms/libcap > > rpms/vim > > Just noting that these packages seem to be very import

Re: Inactive packages removed from packager group

2023-11-19 Thread Mikel Olasagasti
Hi all, Hau idatzi du Kevin Fenzi (ke...@scrye.com) erabiltzaileak (2023 aza. 18(a), lr. (21:09)): > > rpms/golang-github-kurin-blazer > rpms/golang-github-minio > rpms/golang-rsc-pdf Took these as are required by other packages I maintain. > rpms/ed > rpms/multitail I was already co-admin, tak

Re: Inactive packages removed from packager group

2023-11-19 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Sun, Nov 19, 2023 at 08:33:02AM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > rpms/cairo > rpms/createrepo_c > rpms/desktop-backgrounds > rpms/ed > rpms/libcap > rpms/vim Just noting that these packages seem to be very important, yet not volunteering to take them ... > rpms/libldm I thought I was al

Re: Inactive packages removed from packager group

2023-11-19 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
Hello, Carlos. On Sunday, 19 November 2023 at 15:20, Carlos Rodriguez-Fernandez wrote: > Hi all, > I have been in the process of becoming a co-maintainer of *libcap*. But I > still need the sponsorship part of it. Hoping it is resolved before the 6 > weeks mark. I got the non-responsive issue appr

Re: Inactive packages removed from packager group

2023-11-19 Thread Carlos Rodriguez-Fernandez
Hi all, I have been in the process of becoming a co-maintainer of *libcap*. But I still need the sponsorship part of it. Hoping it is resolved before the 6 weeks mark. I got the non-responsive issue approved, the sponsorship issue, and the PR with updates, tests converted to tmt, and cleanups

Re: Inactive packages removed from packager group

2023-11-19 Thread Mattia Verga via devel
Il 18/11/23 21:08, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto: > Hi all, > > Today, 2023-11-18, we have removed inactive packagers > from the packager group. > > This is in accordance with the FESCo policy on inactive packagers: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_inactive_packagers/ > > If the re

Re: Inactive packages removed from packager group

2023-11-18 Thread Kevin Kofler via devel
Kevin Fenzi wrote: > rpms/kde-plasma-ihatethecashew This is a Plasma 4 package and completely useless under Plasma 5 or 6. (There is not even a "cashew" to remove in current Plasma 5.) I am surprised this package even builds at all, we are probably shipping too much of the old kdebase-workspace

Re: Inactive packages removed from packager group

2023-11-18 Thread JT
I pickled up the theme and background packages since I'm already doing those for Fedora Jam. On Sat, Nov 18, 2023 at 5:12 PM Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Sat, 2023-11-18 at 21:57 +0100, Sandro wrote: > > On 18-11-2023 21:08, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > After 6 weeks, the package will be retired. > > >

Re: Inactive packages removed from packager group

2023-11-18 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Sat, 2023-11-18 at 21:57 +0100, Sandro wrote: > On 18-11-2023 21:08, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > After 6 weeks, the package will be retired. > > After another 8 weeks, a new review is needed to unretire it. > > see > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_orphan_and_re > > tired_pack

Re: Inactive packages removed from packager group

2023-11-18 Thread Kalev Lember
I picked up cairo and gtksourceview5. -- Kalev -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-c

Re: Inactive packages removed from packager group

2023-11-18 Thread Sandro
On 18-11-2023 21:08, Kevin Fenzi wrote: After 6 weeks, the package will be retired. After another 8 weeks, a new review is needed to unretire it. seehttps://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_orphan_and_retired_packages/ for more details. I'm wondering if there shouldn't be some impa

Inactive packages removed from packager group

2023-11-18 Thread Kevin Fenzi
Hi all, Today, 2023-11-18, we have removed inactive packagers from the packager group. This is in accordance with the FESCo policy on inactive packagers: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_inactive_packagers/ If the removed user is 'main admin' for a package, this package will