Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> Actually I would say more Qt apps are in Maemo repositories than in Fedora
> ones,
> that's really great, people are moving away from Gtk and switching to Qt! I
> hope
> we will see it in Fedora too soon, with more and more Qt-based apps!
I'm sorry, but I do not wish to
Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said:
> > Nokia managed to upgrade Qt to 4.7 in their Maemo distribution and it got
> > pushed to all devices without causing any problems so far. Their standards
> > for
> > avoiding churn are pretty high and their update scheme is extremely
> > conservative
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 6:01 PM, Lars Seipel wrote:
> On Sunday 24 October 2010 20:24:30 Kalev Lember wrote:
>> KDE is pretty much self contained, whereas a Qt upgrade affects a much
>> larger number of packages. I don't think updating Qt to a new major
>> version in a stable Fedora release is a g
On Sunday 24 October 2010 20:24:30 Kalev Lember wrote:
> KDE is pretty much self contained, whereas a Qt upgrade affects a much
> larger number of packages. I don't think updating Qt to a new major
> version in a stable Fedora release is a good idea; it just causes too
> much churn.
Nokia managed
2010/10/25 Kevin Fenzi
> On Sun, 24 Oct 2010 21:24:30 +0300
> Kalev Lember wrote:
>
> > On 10/20/2010 03:02 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > > The question is (we agreed on KDE SIG meeting yesterday) - should we
> > > update Qt to 4.7 too or build KDE stack with current 4.6 series? As
> > > there
On Sun, 24 Oct 2010 21:24:30 +0300
Kalev Lember wrote:
> On 10/20/2010 03:02 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > The question is (we agreed on KDE SIG meeting yesterday) - should we
> > update Qt to 4.7 too or build KDE stack with current 4.6 series? As
> > there are a few Qt packages outside of KDE S
On 10/20/2010 03:02 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> The question is (we agreed on KDE SIG meeting yesterday) - should we
> update Qt to 4.7 too or build KDE stack with current 4.6 series? As
> there are a few Qt packages outside of KDE SIG/Qt maintainers scope,
> we'd like to hear any objections again
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 20 Oct 2010 16:41:16 +0200, you wrote:
>Is there a version of PyQt built agains qt-4.7. If so, I can
>build my application which are depending on it agains the new
>release. I think there should no issue to build my applications
>agains a new
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 20 Oct 2010 14:02:49 +0200, you wrote:
>The question is (we agreed on KDE SIG meeting yesterday) - should we update Qt
>to 4.7 too or build KDE stack with current 4.6 series? As there are a few Qt
>packages outside of KDE SIG/Qt maintainers
