2010/10/25 Kevin Fenzi <ke...@scrye.com> > On Sun, 24 Oct 2010 21:24:30 +0300 > Kalev Lember <ka...@smartlink.ee> wrote: > > > On 10/20/2010 03:02 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > > > The question is (we agreed on KDE SIG meeting yesterday) - should we > > > update Qt to 4.7 too or build KDE stack with current 4.6 series? As > > > there are a few Qt packages outside of KDE SIG/Qt maintainers scope, > > > we'd like to hear any objections against update - bugs we can fix > > > etc. Qt 4.7 is quite well tested, thanks to work on Fedora 14 (Qt > > > 4.7 is already included) and a lot of users are actually using this > > > combination in Fedora 13. > > > > KDE is pretty much self contained, whereas a Qt upgrade affects a much > > larger number of packages. I don't think updating Qt to a new major > > version in a stable Fedora release is a good idea; it just causes too > > much churn. > > ...snip... > > I agree with Kalev here. Qt upgrade in a stable release is to be > avoided unless there's some severe bug or security issue that can't be > backported. > > kevin > > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >
I have KDE 4.5.2 in my Fedora 13 wich as far as I understand uses the last version of Qt, the computer is working Flawlessly :D -- <-Manuel Escudero-> Linux User #509052 @GWave: jmlev...@googlewave.com @Blogger: http://www.blogxenode.tk/ (Xenode Systems Blog) PGP/GnuPG: DAE3 82E9 D68E 7AE4 ED31 1F8F 4AF4 D00C 50E7 ABC6
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
