On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 2:28 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 09, 2024 at 01:37:20PM +0200, Siteshwar Vashisht wrote:
> > I request somebody from the tools team to comment on these concerns. We only
> > report the defects identified by gcc, clang etc.
>
> You wrote:
>
> > TLDR: This r
On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 12:29 PM Siteshwar Vashisht
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 12:21 PM Daniel P. Berrangé
> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 11:10:34AM +0200, Siteshwar Vashisht wrote:
>> > On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 10:10 PM David Malcolm wrote:
>> >
>> > > On Tue, 2024-07-09 at 1
On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 2:32 PM Siteshwar Vashisht wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 1:30 AM Daniel P. Berrangé
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 09, 2024 at 04:03:10PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2024-07-09 at 13:37 +0200, Siteshwar Vashisht wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 1:16
On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 4:55 PM Kamil Dudka wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, July 9, 2024 12:45:18 PM CEST Siteshwar Vashisht wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 6, 2024 at 2:05 AM Siteshwar Vashisht
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I am writing this message to get feedback from the community on possibly
> > > n
On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 1:30 AM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 09, 2024 at 04:03:10PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> > On Tue, 2024-07-09 at 13:37 +0200, Siteshwar Vashisht wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 1:16 PM Daniel P. Berrangé
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > For packages I'm i
On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 12:21 PM Daniel P. Berrangé
wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 11:10:34AM +0200, Siteshwar Vashisht wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 10:10 PM David Malcolm
> wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 2024-07-09 at 13:37 +0200, Siteshwar Vashisht wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 1:16 P
On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 11:10:34AM +0200, Siteshwar Vashisht wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 10:10 PM David Malcolm wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2024-07-09 at 13:37 +0200, Siteshwar Vashisht wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 1:16 PM Daniel P. Berrangé
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Sat, Jul 06, 2
On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 10:10 PM David Malcolm wrote:
> On Tue, 2024-07-09 at 13:37 +0200, Siteshwar Vashisht wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 1:16 PM Daniel P. Berrangé
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, Jul 06, 2024 at 02:05:37AM +0200, Siteshwar Vashisht wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > I
On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 7:15 AM Tom Stellard wrote:
> On 7/5/24 17:05, Siteshwar Vashisht wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am writing this message to get feedback from the community on possibly
> new defects identified by static analyzers in Critical Path Packages that
> have changed in Fedora 41. For
On 7/5/24 17:05, Siteshwar Vashisht wrote:
Hello,
I am writing this message to get feedback from the community on possibly new
defects identified by static analyzers in Critical Path Packages that have
changed in Fedora 41. For context, please see my previous email[1].
TLDR: This report[2] co
On Tue, Jul 09, 2024 at 04:03:10PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Tue, 2024-07-09 at 13:37 +0200, Siteshwar Vashisht wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 1:16 PM Daniel P. Berrangé
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > For packages I'm involved in (QEMU, libvirt), there are a huge
> > > number of
> > > reporte
On Tue, 2024-07-09 at 13:37 +0200, Siteshwar Vashisht wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 1:16 PM Daniel P. Berrangé
>
> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Jul 06, 2024 at 02:05:37AM +0200, Siteshwar Vashisht wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I am writing this message to get feedback from the community on
> > > pos
On Tue, 2024-07-09 at 13:37 +0200, Siteshwar Vashisht wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 1:16 PM Daniel P. Berrangé
>
> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Jul 06, 2024 at 02:05:37AM +0200, Siteshwar Vashisht wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I am writing this message to get feedback from the community on
> > > pos
On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 2:28 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 09, 2024 at 01:37:20PM +0200, Siteshwar Vashisht wrote:
> > I request somebody from the tools team to comment on these concerns. We
> only
> > report the defects identified by gcc, clang etc.
>
> You wrote:
>
> > TLDR: This
On Tue, Jul 09, 2024 at 01:37:20PM +0200, Siteshwar Vashisht wrote:
> I request somebody from the tools team to comment on these concerns. We only
> report the defects identified by gcc, clang etc.
You wrote:
> TLDR: This report[2] contains 73976 identified defects.
and again above said they w
On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 1:16 PM Daniel P. Berrangé
wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 06, 2024 at 02:05:37AM +0200, Siteshwar Vashisht wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am writing this message to get feedback from the community on possibly
> > new defects identified by static analyzers in Critical Path Packages that
On Sat, Jul 06, 2024 at 02:05:37AM +0200, Siteshwar Vashisht wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am writing this message to get feedback from the community on possibly
> new defects identified by static analyzers in Critical Path Packages that
> have changed in Fedora 41. For context, please see my previous ema
On Sat, Jul 6, 2024 at 2:05 AM Siteshwar Vashisht
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am writing this message to get feedback from the community on possibly
> new defects identified by static analyzers in Critical Path Packages that
> have changed in Fedora 41. For context, please see my previous email[1].
>
Hello,
I am writing this message to get feedback from the community on possibly
new defects identified by static analyzers in Critical Path Packages that
have changed in Fedora 41. For context, please see my previous email[1].
TLDR: This report[2] contains 73976 identified defects. Please review
19 matches
Mail list logo
