On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 7:53 AM, Stanislav Kozina wrote:
> Hi Neal,
>
>>> Hello Hans,
>>>
>>> (adding some more folks on CC..)
>>>
>>> You've correctly mentioned one of the problems with the kmod tools, that
>>> there are several versions in a various stages of loneliness. The other
>>> problem is
Hi,
On 14-02-17 14:24, Stanislav Kozina wrote:
Hi,
On 13-02-17 14:27, Stanislav Kozina wrote:
Hello Hans,
(adding some more folks on CC..)
You've correctly mentioned one of the problems with the kmod tools, that there
are several versions in a various stages of loneliness. The other probl
Hi,
On 13-02-17 14:27, Stanislav Kozina wrote:
Hello Hans,
(adding some more folks on CC..)
You've correctly mentioned one of the problems with the kmod tools,
that there are several versions in a various stages of loneliness.
The other problem is that the usage of them is not trivial, eg.
Hi Neal,
Hello Hans,
(adding some more folks on CC..)
You've correctly mentioned one of the problems with the kmod tools, that
there are several versions in a various stages of loneliness. The other
problem is that the usage of them is not trivial, eg. the
%kernel_module_package macro (as the
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 13-02-17 14:27, Stanislav Kozina wrote:
>>
>> Hello Hans,
>>
>> (adding some more folks on CC..)
>>
>> You've correctly mentioned one of the problems with the kmod tools, that
>> there are several versions in a various stages of l
Hi,
On 13-02-17 14:27, Stanislav Kozina wrote:
Hello Hans,
(adding some more folks on CC..)
You've correctly mentioned one of the problems with the kmod tools, that there
are several versions in a various stages of loneliness. The other problem is
that the usage of them is not trivial, eg. t
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 8:27 AM, Stanislav Kozina wrote:
> Hello Hans,
>
> (adding some more folks on CC..)
>
> You've correctly mentioned one of the problems with the kmod tools, that
> there are several versions in a various stages of loneliness. The other
> problem is that the usage of them is
Hello Hans,
(adding some more folks on CC..)
You've correctly mentioned one of the problems with the kmod tools, that
there are several versions in a various stages of loneliness. The other
problem is that the usage of them is not trivial, eg. the
%kernel_module_package macro (as the main use
Hi,
On 13-02-17 10:05, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
2017-02-13 9:29 GMT+01:00 Hans de Goede :
Hi all,
redhat-rpm-config in Fedora still contains an ancient copy of kmodtool
back from the days when Fedora allowed kmods directly into the main
Fedora repo, rather then only allowing them in 3th party re
2017-02-13 9:29 GMT+01:00 Hans de Goede :
> Hi all,
>
> redhat-rpm-config in Fedora still contains an ancient copy of kmodtool
> back from the days when Fedora allowed kmods directly into the main
> Fedora repo, rather then only allowing them in 3th party repositories.
>
> Currently 3th party repos
Hi all,
redhat-rpm-config in Fedora still contains an ancient copy of kmodtool
back from the days when Fedora allowed kmods directly into the main
Fedora repo, rather then only allowing them in 3th party repositories.
Currently 3th party repositories like rpmfusion (I've put Nicolas
and Leigh fr
11 matches
Mail list logo
