Re: FC13 nss-softokn-freebl update issues

2010-06-02 Thread Bill Nottingham
Elio Maldonado (emald...@redhat.com) said: > > 2) Wait for either of https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/glibc-2.12-2 > > or > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pidgin-2.7.1-2.fc13 to be pushed to > > stable, as those will pull in the i686 nss-softokn-freebl through library > > depend

Re: FC13 nss-softokn-freebl update issues

2010-06-02 Thread Elio Maldonado
On 06/02/2010 12:51 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Robert Relyea (rrel...@redhat.com) said: >>> It's due to the fact that nss-softokn-freebl (actually, *all* the nss/nspr >>> libraires) do not fit the normal library naming, so it's not explicitly >>> pulled for >>> multilib. For any update or releas

Re: FC13 nss-softokn-freebl update issues

2010-06-02 Thread Bill Nottingham
Robert Relyea (rrel...@redhat.com) said: > > It's due to the fact that nss-softokn-freebl (actually, *all* the nss/nspr > > libraires) do not fit the normal library naming, so it's not explicitly > > pulled for > > multilib. For any update or release set that's composed with a package that > > e

Re: FC13 nss-softokn-freebl update issues

2010-06-02 Thread Robert Relyea
On 06/01/2010 11:48 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Elio Maldonado (emald...@redhat.com) said: > >> Not sure but I strongly suspect a change made to nss.spec to be the cause. >> See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596840#c7 >> > It's due to the fact that nss-softokn-freebl (actu

Re: FC13 nss-softokn-freebl update issues

2010-06-01 Thread Bill Nottingham
Elio Maldonado (emald...@redhat.com) said: > Getting back to > >> (i.e., libfreebl3.so instead of libfreebl.so.3)? > > No danger of the name class I alluded for nss but we still want to preserve > the names so as not to break other dependent packages. I wonder if aliases > may help in any way.

Re: FC13 nss-softokn-freebl update issues

2010-06-01 Thread Elio Maldonado
t; Sent: Tuesday, June 1, 2010 1:32:43 PM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific Subject: Re: FC13 nss-softokn-freebl update issues I don't know when the 3 suffix was added. It may have been due to versioning at some time but if I recall correctly we keep the 3 suffix to avoid a name class with with t

Re: FC13 nss-softokn-freebl update issues

2010-06-01 Thread Bill Nottingham
Elio Maldonado (emald...@redhat.com) said: > I don't know when the 3 suffix was added. It may have been due to versioning > at some time but if I recall correctly we keep the 3 suffix to avoid a name > class with with the other nss package (name switch service I believe). Bob or > Kai can set m

Re: FC13 nss-softokn-freebl update issues

2010-06-01 Thread Elio Maldonado
1 AM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific Subject: Re: FC13 nss-softokn-freebl update issues Elio Maldonado (emald...@redhat.com) said: > Not sure but I strongly suspect a change made to nss.spec to be the cause. > See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596840#c7 It's due to the fa

Re: FC13 nss-softokn-freebl update issues

2010-06-01 Thread Bill Nottingham
Elio Maldonado (emald...@redhat.com) said: > Not sure but I strongly suspect a change made to nss.spec to be the cause. > See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596840#c7 It's due to the fact that nss-softokn-freebl (actually, *all* the nss/nspr libraires) do not fit the normal library

Re: FC13 nss-softokn-freebl update issues

2010-05-30 Thread Elio Maldonado
0 1:48:38 AM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific Subject: Re: FC13 nss-softokn-freebl update issues On 29 May 2010 05:57, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > Hi, > > ATM, I am observing this: > > # repoquery -qa  'nss-softokn-freebl*' > nss-softokn-freebl-0:3.12.4-19.fc13.x86_64 > nss

Re: FC13 nss-softokn-freebl update issues

2010-05-29 Thread Jonathan Underwood
On 29 May 2010 05:57, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > Hi, > > ATM, I am observing this: > > # repoquery -qa  'nss-softokn-freebl*' > nss-softokn-freebl-0:3.12.4-19.fc13.x86_64 > nss-softokn-freebl-0:3.12.4-17.fc13.i686 > nss-softokn-freebl-devel-0:3.12.4-19.fc13.x86_64 > nss-softokn-freebl-devel-0:3.12.4-

FC13 nss-softokn-freebl update issues

2010-05-28 Thread Ralf Corsepius
Hi, ATM, I am observing this: # repoquery -qa 'nss-softokn-freebl*' nss-softokn-freebl-0:3.12.4-19.fc13.x86_64 nss-softokn-freebl-0:3.12.4-17.fc13.i686 nss-softokn-freebl-devel-0:3.12.4-19.fc13.x86_64 nss-softokn-freebl-devel-0:3.12.4-19.fc13.i686 http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/li