Elio Maldonado (emald...@redhat.com) said: > Getting back to > >> (i.e., libfreebl3.so instead of libfreebl.so.3)? > > No danger of the name class I alluded for nss but we still want to preserve > the names so as not to break other dependent packages. I wonder if aliases > may help in any way. If we were to add, via the spec file, libfreebl.so.3 as > an alias to libfreebl3.so (and similarly with libnssdmb3.so and > linsoftoken3.so), would that help?
I'm not sure it would really *help*, as it might cause confusion as some app would think that's the actual soname. I'm mainly curious as to the history of how the libraries ended up that way. Bill -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
