On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 05:52:51PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 19.1.2015 v 17:32 Jakub Jelinek napsal(a):
> > As FESCO denied mass rebuild of F22, I've adjusted
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GCC5
> > the current rpms are built with --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=c++98
> > thus will n
Dne 19.1.2015 v 17:32 Jakub Jelinek napsal(a):
> Hi!
>
> As FESCO denied mass rebuild of F22, I've adjusted
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GCC5
> the current rpms are built with --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=c++98
> thus will not have standard conforming std::string/std::list by default,
>
Hi!
As FESCO denied mass rebuild of F22, I've adjusted
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GCC5
the current rpms are built with --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=c++98
thus will not have standard conforming std::string/std::list by default,
and I'd like to include gcc 5 in F22 anyway, just only what
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 03:45:23PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > Unfortunately it needs an updated libtool ...
Sure, one needs to build libtool too.
> >
> > Error: Package: libtool-2.4.2-31.fc22.aarch64 (@rawhide)
> >Requires: gcc = 4.9.2
> >Removing: gcc-4.9.2-5.fc
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 03:20:54PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 08:10:14AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 04:12:03AM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 4:00 AM, Richard W.M. Jones
> > > wrote:
> > > > Jakub:
>
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 08:10:14AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 04:12:03AM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 4:00 AM, Richard W.M. Jones
> > wrote:
> > > Jakub:
> > >
> > > I will test gcc 5 on my Rawhide aarch64 machine, if you can point me
>
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 04:12:03AM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 4:00 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > Jakub:
> >
> > I will test gcc 5 on my Rawhide aarch64 machine, if you can point me
> > to either a build of it or an SRPM. So far I see no gcc 5 builds in
> > either K
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 4:00 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Jakub:
>
> I will test gcc 5 on my Rawhide aarch64 machine, if you can point me
> to either a build of it or an SRPM. So far I see no gcc 5 builds in
> either Koji or the linked wiki page.
aarch64 scratch build that Jakub did yesterday
Jakub:
I will test gcc 5 on my Rawhide aarch64 machine, if you can point me
to either a build of it or an SRPM. So far I see no gcc 5 builds in
either Koji or the linked wiki page.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and vi
On 14 January 2015 at 15:46, Jonathan Underwood
> Perhaps it would be worth adding -std=gnu11 to the F22 default flags
> now and having a rebuild, before gcc5 lands, to start shaking out
> problems now?
I think this is a really good idea.
Richard.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 5:51 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
>> * Contingency mechanism: Revert to older gcc, mass rebuild everything again
>> * Contingency deadline: Before release
>
> This is an invasive contingency mechanism, requiring retesting a lot of
> functionality; the contingency deadline for
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 12:51:24PM -0500, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> > * Contingency mechanism: Revert to older gcc, mass rebuild everything again
> > * Contingency deadline: Before release
>
> This is an invasive contingency mechanism, requiring retesting a lot of
> functionality; the contingenc
> * Contingency mechanism: Revert to older gcc, mass rebuild everything again
> * Contingency deadline: Before release
This is an invasive contingency mechanism, requiring retesting a lot of
functionality; the contingency deadline for this (i.e. when we need to be
comfortable that the revert wil
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 02:24:29PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > I was thinking exactly that, mass rebuild is scheduled for Jan 30th
> > according to the schedule [1] with branching 10 days or so later. That
> > is only two weeks away. With statements like "The release will happen
> > probably
Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> Switch GCC in Fedora 22 to 5.x.y, rebuild all packages with it.
Does cross-gcc need to switch simultaneously? Some packages are built with
that, I believe.
David
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 05:05:50PM +, David Howells wrote:
> Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
>
> > Switch GCC in Fedora 22 to 5.x.y, rebuild all packages with it.
>
> Does cross-gcc need to switch simultaneously? Some packages are built with
> that, I believe.
It is a different package, so it can s
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 1:46 PM, Jonathan Underwood <
jonathan.underw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 14 January 2015 at 14:47, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 02:44:03PM +, Richard Hughes wrote:
> >> On 14 January 2015 at 14:37, Jonathan Underwood
> >> wrote:
> >> > Only a partia
On 14 January 2015 at 14:47, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 02:44:03PM +, Richard Hughes wrote:
>> On 14 January 2015 at 14:37, Jonathan Underwood
>> wrote:
>> > Only a partial answer to your question, but one fairly significant
>> > change (as you know) compared to the GCC up
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 03:47:18PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 02:44:03PM +, Richard Hughes wrote:
> > On 14 January 2015 at 14:37, Jonathan Underwood
> > wrote:
> > > Only a partial answer to your question, but one fairly significant
> > > change (as you know) compar
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 03:05:09PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > Well, if we want to turn Fedora into a collection of obsolete software
> > rather than trying to lead progress, we don't have to update anything.
>
> I think that's a bit of an over reaction, ultimately F-22 is due to
> branch on
>> > > http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/porting_to.html → 404
>> >
>> > That will be added likely after the test mass rebuild with what we find
>> > during that.
>>
>> Do you have any estimate when it will be done? F22 schedule is/will be pretty
>> tight. We already have problem scheduling mass rebuild and
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 02:44:03PM +, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 14 January 2015 at 14:37, Jonathan Underwood
> wrote:
> > Only a partial answer to your question, but one fairly significant
> > change (as you know) compared to the GCC upgrades for those releases
> > is moving from C89 to C11 a
On 14 January 2015 at 14:37, Jonathan Underwood
wrote:
> Only a partial answer to your question, but one fairly significant
> change (as you know) compared to the GCC upgrades for those releases
> is moving from C89 to C11 as the default C standard for the compiler
Is there any easy way for humbl
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 02:37:02PM +, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
> On 14 January 2015 at 14:31, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > Again, how is that different from F9, F11, F13, F15, F17, F19?
>
> Only a partial answer to your question, but one fairly significant
> change (as you know) compared to the
On 14 January 2015 at 14:31, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Again, how is that different from F9, F11, F13, F15, F17, F19?
Only a partial answer to your question, but one fairly significant
change (as you know) compared to the GCC upgrades for those releases
is moving from C89 to C11 as the default C sta
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 09:12:42AM -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
>> - Original Message -
>> > On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 02:55:15PM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
>> > wrote:
>> > > http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/porting_to.html → 404
>>
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 02:24:29PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> >> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 02:55:15PM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> >> wrote:
> >> > http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/porting_to.html → 404
>
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 09:12:42AM -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 02:55:15PM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > > http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/porting_to.html → 404
> >
> > That will be added likely after the test mass rebuild with w
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 02:55:15PM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>> > http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/porting_to.html → 404
>>
>> That will be added likely after the test mass rebuild with what we find
>
- Original Message -
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 02:55:15PM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/porting_to.html → 404
>
> That will be added likely after the test mass rebuild with what we find
> during that.
Do you have any estimate when it will be done?
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 02:55:15PM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/porting_to.html → 404
That will be added likely after the test mass rebuild with what we find
during that.
Jakub
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedor
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 02:55:15PM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 12:53:18PM +0100, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > = Proposed System Wide Change: GCC5 =
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GCC5
> >
> > Change owner(s): Jakub Jelínek
> >
> > Switch GCC in
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 12:53:18PM +0100, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> = Proposed System Wide Change: GCC5 =
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GCC5
>
> Change owner(s): Jakub Jelínek
>
> Switch GCC in Fedora 22 to 5.x.y, rebuild all packages with it.
>
> == Detailed Description ==
> GCC 5 i
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 01:34:26PM +0100, Dan Horák wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Jan 2015 12:53:18 +0100
> Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
>
> > = Proposed System Wide Change: GCC5 =
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GCC5
> >
> > Change owner(s): Jakub Jelínek
> >
> > Switch GCC in Fedora 22 to 5.x.y,
On Wed, 14 Jan 2015 12:53:18 +0100
Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> = Proposed System Wide Change: GCC5 =
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GCC5
>
> Change owner(s): Jakub Jelínek
>
> Switch GCC in Fedora 22 to 5.x.y, rebuild all packages with it.
>
> == Detailed Description ==
> GCC 5 is cur
Dne 14.1.2015 v 12:53 Jaroslav Reznik napsal(a):
> = Proposed System Wide Change: GCC5 =
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GCC5
>
> Change owner(s): Jakub Jelínek
>
> Switch GCC in Fedora 22 to 5.x.y, rebuild all packages with it.
>
> == Detailed Description ==
> GCC 5 is currently in stag
= Proposed System Wide Change: GCC5 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GCC5
Change owner(s): Jakub Jelínek
Switch GCC in Fedora 22 to 5.x.y, rebuild all packages with it.
== Detailed Description ==
GCC 5 is currently in stage3, but in 3 days will move to stage4, in prerelease
state with
37 matches
Mail list logo
