Re: F-17 Branched report: 20120211 changes

2012-02-13 Thread Johannes Lips
Alright to answer my own question: It was already orphaned in the last round before f16. So it's probably worth reviving! But I think the associated workload with reviving a package could be lowered, just to make it easier for contributors! On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 9:27 AM, Johannes Lips wrote: >

Re: F-17 Branched report: 20120211 changes

2012-02-12 Thread Johannes Lips
What's the reason pyorbit is orphaned and deprecated? It was not part of the recent mass orphaning and is a dep for many packages. I just would like to know if it's worth reviving it since one of my packages is indirectly depending on it and now refuses to build in rawhide. Thanks johannes -- d

Re: F-17 Branched report: 20120211 changes

2012-02-11 Thread Rex Dieter
Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 19:57:33 -0600, > Dennis Gilmore wrote: >> >> looks like something in X packaging changed or didnt work as expected > > That was fixed this morning. I have already tried out the updates and > they seem to work fine. > > openjpeg's soname bump

Re: F-17 Branched report: 20120211 changes

2012-02-11 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 19:57:33 -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > looks like something in X packaging changed or didnt work as expected That was fixed this morning. I have already tried out the updates and they seem to work fine. openjpeg's soname bump might also cause problems. It is blockin

Re: F-17 Branched report: 20120211 changes

2012-02-11 Thread Dennis Gilmore
El Sat, 11 Feb 2012 08:40:45 -0600 Mike Chambers escribió: > On Sat, 2012-02-11 at 10:06 +, Branched Report wrote: > > Compose started at Sat Feb 11 08:15:07 UTC 2012 > > Is the tree installable yet (I yet to see images dir and such)? Don't > mean is an ISO built, but can the tree be install

Re: F-17 Branched report: 20120211 changes

2012-02-11 Thread John Reiser
>> What do you mean, exactly, by "can the tree be installed against"? > Install against via nfs/http/ftp but there are no images dir with the > netinstall.iso or whatever to do a quick cd or anything. I don't create > images as I just make quick boot cd from the boot.iso. When pungi succeeds, th

Re: F-17 Branched report: 20120211 changes

2012-02-11 Thread Mike Chambers
On Sat, 2012-02-11 at 07:40 -0800, John Reiser wrote: > > Is the tree installable yet (I yet to see images dir and such)? Don't > > mean is an ISO built, but can the tree be installed against or will be > > soon? > > Yesterday (Friday) using pungi-2.10-1.fc17 I built an anaconda install DVD > of

Re: F-17 Branched report: 20120211 changes

2012-02-11 Thread John Reiser
> Is the tree installable yet (I yet to see images dir and such)? Don't > mean is an ISO built, but can the tree be installed against or will be > soon? Yesterday (Friday) using pungi-2.10-1.fc17 I built an anaconda install DVD of f17-branched. This effectively mirrors the tree into /var/cache/p

Re: F-17 Branched report: 20120211 changes

2012-02-11 Thread Mike Chambers
On Sat, 2012-02-11 at 10:06 +, Branched Report wrote: > Compose started at Sat Feb 11 08:15:07 UTC 2012 Is the tree installable yet (I yet to see images dir and such)? Don't mean is an ISO built, but can the tree be installed against or will be soon? -- Mike Chambers Madisonville, KY "Best