Alright to answer my own question: It was already orphaned in the last round before f16. So it's probably worth reviving! But I think the associated workload with reviving a package could be lowered, just to make it easier for contributors!
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 9:27 AM, Johannes Lips <johannes.l...@googlemail.com > wrote: > What's the reason pyorbit is orphaned and deprecated? It was not part of > the recent mass orphaning and is a dep for many packages. > I just would like to know if it's worth reviving it since one of my > packages is indirectly depending on it and now refuses to build in rawhide. > Thanks > > johannes >
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
