On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Johannes Lips
> wrote:
>> Well I would like to see tilda maintained in fedora. In this bugreport I
>> created the patch and asked a provenpackager to apply it, which never
>> actually happened.
>
> I'll take a lo
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Johannes Lips
wrote:
> Well I would like to see tilda maintained in fedora. In this bugreport I
> created the patch and asked a provenpackager to apply it, which never
> actually happened.
I'll take a look.
-J
> I could of course apply for co-maintainership but
Well I would like to see tilda maintained in fedora. In this bugreport I
created the patch and asked a provenpackager to apply it, which never
actually happened.
I could of course apply for co-maintainership but I doubt that the
maintainer would answer in a timely manner, like on most of his bugrep
On Fri, 04 May 2012 18:30:58 +0200, PM (Petr) wrote:
> > 21 link with flex libs<-- flex doesn't change often, though
>
> I believe that libfl.a hasn't really changed in Fedora at all. It
> exports two symbols, totaling something like 10 lines of actual code.
> Absence of client rebui
Michael Schwendt writes:
> 21 link with flex libs<-- flex doesn't change often, though
I believe that libfl.a hasn't really changed in Fedora at all. It
exports two symbols, totaling something like 10 lines of actual code.
Absence of client rebuilds is just not a problem in this cas
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 9:23 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> * 40 packages in Rawhide are older than one of their -static
> BuildRequires. Doesn't mean much. Just curious. Of those 40 packages,
>
> 7 link with binutils libs
> 21 link with flex libs <-- flex doesn't change often, though
* 40 packages in Rawhide are older than one of their -static
BuildRequires. Doesn't mean much. Just curious. Of those 40 packages,
7 link with binutils libs
21 link with flex libs<-- flex doesn't change often, though
3 link with g2clib libs
6 link with hdf libs
3
