Well I would like to see tilda maintained in fedora. In this bugreport I created the patch and asked a provenpackager to apply it, which never actually happened. I could of course apply for co-maintainership but I doubt that the maintainer would answer in a timely manner, like on most of his bugreports. Johannes
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Michael Schwendt < mschwe...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On Fri, 04 May 2012 18:30:58 +0200, PM (Petr) wrote: > > > > 21 link with flex libs <-- flex doesn't change often, though > > > > I believe that libfl.a hasn't really changed in Fedora at all. It > > exports two symbols, totaling something like 10 lines of actual code. > > Absence of client rebuilds is just not a problem in this case. > > > > > tilda-0.9.6-6.fc16.src older than flex-2.5.35-15.fc18.src.rpm > > > 231 days > > Yeah, I figured so much. > > Interestingly, "tilda" has failed to rebuild two times in a row according > to koji status, and its bug status page doesn't look too pretty: > > http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/tilda > > There's even somebody interested in co-maintaining it, but hasn't got > a response in over a month: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/781875 > > -- > Fedora release 17 (Beefy Miracle) - Linux 3.3.4-3.fc17.x86_64 > loadavg: 0.12 0.04 0.05 > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
