On Fri, Oct 4, 2024, at 9:51 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>> Problem 4: package python3-fb-re2-1.0.7-18.fc41.x86_64 from fedora
>> requires libre2.so.9()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
>> - problem with installed package python3-fb-re2-1.0.7-15.fc40.x86_64
>> -
On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 11:23:34AM +0200, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
> On 3.09.2024 10:08, Leigh Scott wrote:
>
> > You have some other issue as all those rpmfusion dep issues are bogus.
>
> Thanks for pointing it out. Sorted out rpmfusion issues.
>
> Two problems left:
>
> Problem 1: package a
On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 07:52:47AM +, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
> Error:
> Problem 1: package ghc-foldable1-classes-compat-0.1-4.fc40.x86_64 from
> @System requires libHSarray-0.5.4.0-ghc9.4.5.so()(64bit), but none of the
> providers can be installed
Already resolved, https://bugzilla.redhat.c
On Mon, Sep 02, 2024 at 11:37:04AM -, Kanitha Chim wrote:
> Error:
> Problem 1: package cdn-utils-1.162-1.fc40eng.noarch from @System requires
> python(abi) = 3.12, but none of the providers can be installed
> Problem 2: package engproduct-cli-1.36-1.fc40eng.noarch from @System
> requires
On Mon, Sep 02, 2024 at 01:25:35PM +0200, Cristian Le via devel wrote:
> On my system I get an exiv2/krita issue and a re2 issue:
>
> ```
> Error:
> Problem 1: problem with installed package krita-5.2.2-7.fc40.x86_64
> - package krita-5.2.2-11.fc41.x86_64 from fedora requires
I have krita-5.2.
On Mon, Sep 02, 2024 at 11:08:58AM -, Artur Frenszek-Iwicki wrote:
> I have three machines running F40; here are the results:
>
> #1
> Error:
> Problem 1: package module-build-service-3.9.2-9.fc41.noarch from fedora
> requires python(abi) = 3.12, but none of the providers can be i
Dne 04. 09. 24 v 15:36 Leslie Satenstein via devel napsal(a):
I have frustrations with bugzilla, and please, if you can, try the
following
sudo dnf/dnf5 install meld aisleriot
With every days F41 update the above crashes, and then...
I think you need `meld-3.22.2-5.fc41` from `updates-test
On 05/09/2024 16.24, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Mon, Sep 2, 2024 at 5:21 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Do you want to make Fedora 41 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time
and try to run:
dnf --releasever=41 --enablerepo=updates-testing --assumeno
distro-sync
It looks good. I assume the rp
On Mon, Sep 2, 2024 at 5:21 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Do you want to make Fedora 41 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time
> and try to run:
>
> dnf --releasever=41 --enablerepo=updates-testing --assumeno
> distro-sync
>
Here's my results, seems to be some issues with InsightToolkit, gu
On 9/5/24 06:57 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
dnf --releasever=41 --enablerepo=updates-testing --assumeno distro-sync
Most of my issues are due to gimp: gutenprint-plugin, gimp-resynthesizer,
gimp-lqr-plugin.
Problem #2 relates to kicad-nightly which comes from Copr, so that may not be a
fair te
Dne 02. 09. 24 v 12:20 odp. Miroslav Suchý napsal(a):
Do you want to make Fedora 41 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
try to run:
dnf --releasever=41 --enablerepo=updates-testing --assumeno distro-sync
I hit
Problem 1: installed package compat-golang-github-shirou-gopsutil-3-de
I have frustrations with bugzilla, and please, if you can, try the following
sudo dnf/dnf5 install meld aisleriot
With every days F41 update the above crashes, and then...
dnf update (always fails to fetch updates)
Thanks in advance
Leslie Satenstein
On Wednesday, September 4, 2024
It looks like most or all of these issues come from the third-party
signal-libringrtc package, which I think must have come from
https://download.opensuse.org/repositories/network:/im:/signal/Fedora_40/x86_64/.
It would have to be rebuilt for Fedora 41. It doesn’t look like there is
a
https://
On 3.09.2024 10:08, Leigh Scott wrote:
You have some other issue as all those rpmfusion dep issues are bogus.
Thanks for pointing it out. Sorted out rpmfusion issues.
Two problems left:
Problem 1: package alizams-1.9.10-2.fc41.x86_64 from fedora requires
libITKCommon-4.13.so.1()(64bit), bu
I get the following result on my F40 machine:
```
Error:
Problem: package python3-fb-re2-1.0.7-18.fc41.x86_64 from fedora
requires libre2.so.9()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- problem with installed package python3-fb-re2-1.0.7-15.fc40.x86_64
- re2-1:20220601-19.fc40.
> > > * you may want to run the same command with dnf5 to help test new dnf. Do
> > > not forget to add --best otherwise DNF5 hides all problems.
> >
> > One thing I've noticed with dnf5 is that somethings are missing, I'm
> > not sure if they've been replaced with something else. EG "dnf
> > conf
V Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 02:28:38PM +0100, Peter Robinson napsal(a):
> > One note:
> >
> > * you may want to run the same command with dnf5 to help test new dnf. Do
> > not forget to add --best otherwise DNF5 hides all problems.
>
> One thing I've noticed with dnf5 is that somethings are missing, I
> One note:
>
> * you may want to run the same command with dnf5 to help test new dnf. Do not
> forget to add --best otherwise DNF5 hides all problems.
One thing I've noticed with dnf5 is that somethings are missing, I'm
not sure if they've been replaced with something else. EG "dnf
config-manage
I tried both dnf & dnf5 on my three Fedora installations, which, for the
most part, only have the minimal development tools needed to build and
test our software (Cube, OTF2, OPARI2, Score-P, Scalasca).
Everything seemed to work fine without any errors. Also tried to update
one of the installati
$ sudo dnf --releasever=41 --enablerepo=updates-testing --assumeno distro-sync
Last metadata expiration check: 0:01:26 ago on Tue 03 Sep 2024 07:30:01 AM CDT.
Error:
Problem 1: problem with installed package signal-libringrtc-2.46.1-1.1.x86_64
- package signal-libringrtc-2.46.1-1.1.x86_64 from @
Tested on Fedora 40 running Gnome with nvidia hybrid on a zephyrus g14
laptop, no errors to report
On Mon, 2 Sept 2024, 15:51 Miroslav Suchý, wrote:
> Do you want to make Fedora 41 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time
> and try to run:
>
> dnf --releasever=41 --enablerepo=updates-testi
I think the correct solution here will be to build the “official” Python
bindings in the re2 source distribution, which are actively maintained and
which also provide a somewhat-compatible “import re2,” but are distributed on
PyPI as google-re2 rather than fb-re2.
As the new maintainer of the r
Did run through a full update with dnf4 on my Fedora 40 i3 Spin
install to 41 i3 spin (Pre Release) and nothing exploded on my
ThinkPad Edge 0217A16 laptop
https://i.imgur.com/vReaIwy.png
Den tis 3 sep. 2024 kl 10:38 skrev Luna Jernberg :
>
> Odd as i also had problems with RPMFusion
> but remove
Odd as i also had problems with RPMFusion
but removed it and then it works, just updated 1.3GB of Fedora 40
updates on my test laptop and now downloading and installing 2.3GB of
Fedora 41 pre release packages
Den tis 3 sep. 2024 kl 10:09 skrev Leigh Scott :
>
> You have some other issue as all tho
You have some other issue as all those rpmfusion dep issues are bogus.
Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
> On 2.09.2024 12:20, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > Do you want to make Fedora 41 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time
> > and try to run:
> > dnf --releasever=41 --enablerepo=updates-testing --ass
On Mon, Sep 2, 2024 at 10:21 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> Do you want to make Fedora 41 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time
and try to run:
>
> dnf --releasever=41 --enablerepo=updates-testing --assumeno
distro-sync
I got this:
Error:
Problem 1: package ghc-foldable1-classes-compat-0
In my case on two boxes I went all the way, actually did the upgrade.
Somewhat boringly it just worked in both cases.
--
Ian Laurie
FAS: nixuser | IRC: nixuser
TZ: Australia/Sydney
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscr
On 2.09.2024 12:20, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Do you want to make Fedora 41 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time
and try to run:
dnf --releasever=41 --enablerepo=updates-testing --assumeno distro-sync
I have several packages from RPMFusion so some problems (1, 3, 4, 7,
9, 10, 11) are relate
To me, this looks a bit messy:
rror:
Problem 1: package poco-pagecompiler-1.12.4-6.fc40.x86_64 from @System
requires libPocoFoundation.so.94()(64bit), but none of the providers can
be installed
- poco-foundation-1.12.4-6.fc40.x86_64 from @System does not belong
to a distupgrade repository
On Mon, Sep 2, 2024 at 10:21 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> In case you hit dependency issues, please report it against the appropriate
> package.
The only problem I get is:
Error:
Problem: package python3-fb-re2-1.0.7-18.fc41.x86_64 from fedora
requires libre2.so.9()(64bit), but none of the prov
Dne 02. 09. 24 v 7:52 odp. Michael Schwendt napsal(a):
Error:
Problem 1: package wxGTK3-3.0.5.1-10.fc38.x86_64 from @System requires
libtiff.so.5()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
The wxGTK3 package does not exist anymore in Fedora 39 and later.
File dead.package tells it'
On Mon, 2 Sep 2024 07:20:46 -0700, Pablo Sebastián Greco wrote:
> Error:
> Problem 1: package wxGTK3-3.0.5.1-10.fc38.x86_64 from @System requires
> libtiff.so.5()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
The wxGTK3 package does not exist anymore in Fedora 39 and later.
File dead.pac
On Mon, Sep 02, 2024 at 02:10:20PM +0200, H H L P wrote:
Problem 3: package qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld-5.15.17-1.fc41.x86_64
from rpmfusion-free requires libre2.so.9()(64bit), but none of the
providers can be installed
- problem with installed package
qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld-5.15.17-1.fc40.
Somewhat messy for me:
Last metadata expiration check: 0:46:11 ago on Mon 02 Sep 2024 16:37:50
CEST.
Error:
Problem 1: package poco-pagecompiler-1.12.4-6.fc40.x86_64 from @System
requires libPocoFoundation.so.94()(64bit), but none of the providers can
be installed
- poco-foundation-1.12.4-
Error:
Problem 1: package wxGTK3-3.0.5.1-10.fc38.x86_64 from @System requires
libtiff.so.5()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- package wxGTK3-3.0.5.1-10.fc38.x86_64 from @System requires
libtiff.so.5(LIBTIFF_4.0)(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- libtif
> dnf --releasever=41 --enablerepo=updates-testing --assumeno distro-sync
Looks good (on an uptodate F40 system), just with an oddity: IIRC this
package was manually installed, not sure why it is being removed:
Removing dependent packages:
python3-jose
this is mine:
LANG=C sudo dnf --releasever=41 --enablerepo=updates-testing --assumeno
distro-sync
[sudo] password for hhlp:
Updating Subscription Management repositories.
Unable to read consumer identity
This system is not registered with an entitlement server. You can use
subscription-manag
I encountered the following problem:
```
Error:
Problem 1: package cdn-utils-1.162-1.fc40eng.noarch from @System requires
python(abi) = 3.12, but none of the providers can be installed
- python3-3.12.3-2.fc40.x86_64 from @System does not belong to a distupgrade
repository
- problem with i
On my system I get an exiv2/krita issue and a re2 issue:
```
Error:
Problem 1: problem with installed package krita-5.2.2-7.fc40.x86_64
- package krita-5.2.2-11.fc41.x86_64 from fedora requires
libexiv2.so.27()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- krita-5.2.2-7.fc40.x86_64 f
On Mon, Sep 2, 2024 at 12:21 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> Do you want to make Fedora 41 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
> try to run:
>
> dnf --releasever=41 --enablerepo=updates-testing --assumeno distro-sync
>
> This command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will
I have three machines running F40; here are the results:
#1
Error:
Problem 1: package module-build-service-3.9.2-9.fc41.noarch from fedora
requires python(abi) = 3.12, but none of the providers can be installed
- problem with installed package module-build-service-3.9.2-9.fc40.noarc
Do you want to make Fedora 41 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
try to run:
dnf --releasever=41 --enablerepo=updates-testing --assumeno distro-sync
This command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will reveal
potential problems.
You may also run `dnf upgrade` before run
42 matches
Mail list logo
