On Tue, 10 Jan 2023 at 11:55, Stuart S wrote:
> I've just tried this for Fed 35 >> Fed 37
>
> Got the following errors
>
> Problem: conflicting requests
> - nothing provides module(platform:f35) needed by module
> php:remi-7.4:20230104141955:.x86_64
>
You have an outside module instal
I've just tried this for Fed 35 >> Fed 37
Got the following errors
Problem: conflicting requests
- nothing provides module(platform:f35) needed by module
php:remi-7.4:20230104141955:.x86_64
Error:
Problem 1: package php-pecl-imagick-im6-3.7.0-1.fc35.remi.7.4.x86_64 requires
php(api
right, I was running with just "--skip broken"
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduc
Error:
Problem 1: package webkit2gtk3-2.38.1-1.fc36.x86_64 requires
libicui18n.so.69()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- package webkit2gtk3-2.38.1-1.fc36.x86_64 requires
libicuuc.so.69()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- libicu-69.1-6.fc36.x86_64 does not
Problem 1: package gala-libs-6.3.1-3.fc36.x86_64 requires
libmutter-10.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- package gala-libs-6.3.1-3.fc36.x86_64 requires
libmutter-clutter-10.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- mutter-42.5-3.fc36.x86_64 does no
Added --allowerasing
I'll have to wait for the 'beid-release', usually a few weeks after the
official Fedora-release.
Removing dependent packages:
gufw noarch 21.04.0-2@rpmsphere-noarch
oli oli via devel kirjoitti 22.9.2022 klo 18.36:
Last metadata expiration check: 0:10:04 ago on Thu Sep 22 17:22:15 2022.
Error:
Problem 1: package mopidy-spotify-4.1.1-1.fc36.noarch requires
python3.10dist(mopidy) >= 3, but none of the providers can be installed
- mopidy-3.3.0-1.fc36.noarc
On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 1:36 PM Marcin Szydelski wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Fedora release 36 (Thirty Six)
>
> KDE Spin
>
> With a history of upgrading since Fedora 28
(snip)
> Error:
> Problem 1: package gala-6.3.1-3.fc36.x86_64 requires
> libgnome-desktop-3.so.19()(64bit), but none of the providers ca
Last metadata expiration check: 0:10:04 ago on Thu Sep 22 17:22:15 2022.
Error:
Problem 1: package mopidy-spotify-4.1.1-1.fc36.noarch requires
python3.10dist(mopidy) >= 3, but none of the providers can be installed
- mopidy-3.3.0-1.fc36.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository
- pr
Hi
Fedora release 36 (Thirty Six)
KDE Spin
With a history of upgrading since Fedora 28
Last metadata expiration check: 0:03:29 ago on czw, 22 wrz 2022, 13:27:23.
Error:
Problem 1: package gala-6.3.1-3.fc36.x86_64 requires
libgnome-desktop-3.so.19()(64bit), but none of the providers can be
inst
On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 05:30:09PM -, James E. LaBarre wrote:
> Also encountered the same error for 0ad
> ---
>
> Error:
> Problem: problem with installed package 0ad-0.0.25b-2.fc36.x86_64
> - package 0ad-0.0.25b-2.fc36.x86_64 requires
>
...
Downgrading:
conmon x86_64 2:2.1.3-1.fc37
fedora 57 k
grubby x86_64 8.40-66.fc37
fedora
Also encountered the same error for 0ad
---
Error:
Problem: problem with installed package 0ad-0.0.25b-2.fc36.x86_64
- package 0ad-0.0.25b-2.fc36.x86_64 requires
libboost_filesystem.so.1.76.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be
insta
On Mon, Sep 19 2022 at 04:29:22 PM +0200, Kalev Lember
wrote:
I would guess it happened because the F36 webkitgtk version number
was ahead of the F37 webkitgtk version, so the versioned obsoletes
that the F37 webkitgtk packages have didn't match.
Oh, OK then. Good catch!
On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 3:52 PM Michael Catanzaro
wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19 2022 at 12:08:10 AM +0200, Robert-André Mauchin
> wrote:
> > Error: Transaction test error:
> > file /usr/bin/WebKitWebDriver from install of
> > webkit2gtk4.1-2.37.91-1.fc37.x86_64
> > conflicts with file from package w
I see a similar report here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2127841
which reveals a packaging bug. But that one is slightly different
because there is an additional conflict with webkit2gtk5.0 as well,
which is a bug (only one of the F37 packages should provide the file
/usr/bin
On Mon, Sep 19 2022 at 12:08:10 AM +0200, Robert-André Mauchin
wrote:
Error: Transaction test error:
file /usr/bin/WebKitWebDriver from install of
webkit2gtk4.1-2.37.91-1.fc37.x86_64
conflicts with file from package webkit2gtk3-2.38.0-2.fc36.x86_64
This problem would go away if webkit2gtk3
On 9/12/22 14:59, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Do you want to make Fedora 37 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
try to run:
# Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
# next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again
sudo dnf module reset '*'
dnf --releaseve
On Fri, 16 Sep 2022 13:06:42 +
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> Error: Transaction test error:
> file /usr/include/lv2/atom from install of
> lv2-devel-1.18.8-1.fc37.x86_64 conflicts with file from package
> lv2-devel-1.18.2-2.fc36.x86_64
[snip list of lv2-devel conflicts]
https://bu
Error: Transaction test error:
file /usr/include/lv2/atom from install of lv2-devel-1.18.8-1.fc37.x86_64
conflicts with file from package lv2-devel-1.18.2-2.fc36.x86_64
file /usr/include/lv2/buf-size from install of lv2-devel-1.18.8-1.fc37.x86_64
conflicts with file from package lv2-devel-1.1
$ sudo dnf --releasever=37 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f37
--enablerepo=updates-testing $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo
--enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) --assumeno distro-sync
Fedora 37 - x86_64 6.7 MB/s | 81 MB 00:11
Fedora 37 openh264
On Thu, 2022-09-15 at 14:08 +0300, Timo Saarinen wrote:
> > On 15.9.2022 1:11 EEST Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > Hi,
> > where did you get signal-desktop and nodejs-electron ?
> > is not is any known repo that I'm aware
>
> Hi,
>
> signal-desktop package for Fedora is from openSUSE repo. I installe
I'm unable to figure out why, but running the command:
sudo dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=37
on my main system (with RPMFusion and some copr repos enabled)
consistently causes dnf to segfault. The crashing function appears to
be solver_addbestrules. In either case, I'm submitting a bug
> On 15.9.2022 1:11 EEST Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Hi,
> where did you get signal-desktop and nodejs-electron ?
> is not is any known repo that I'm aware
Hi,
signal-desktop package for Fedora is from openSUSE repo. I installed it using
the following commands.
dnf config-manager --add-repo
http
On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 9:52 PM Alexander Ploumistos <
alex.ploumis...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The only issues I've encountered were related to nautilus extensions.
> Bugs are open for all of them and I submitted a PR for an rpmfusion
> package.
>
> However, I think that for people on Workstation who
Works fine for me.
Removing:
kernel x86_64 5.19.4-200.fc36
@updates 0
kernel-corex86_64 5.19.4-200.fc36
@updates 92 M
kernel-modules
> dnf --releasever=37 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f37 \
> --enablerepo=updates-testing \
> $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo
> --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \
> --assumeno distro-sync
Problem 1: problem with installed package mkdocs-1.2.3-2.fc36.noarch
- mkdocs-
On Tue, 2022-09-13 at 16:46 +, Timo S via devel wrote:
> $ sudo dnf --releasever=37 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f37 -
> -enablerepo=updates-testing $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null
> && echo --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) --assumeno distro-sync
> Last metadata expiration
# dnf --releasever=37 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f37
--enablerepo=updates-testing $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null
&& echo --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) --assumeno distro-sync
Fedora 37 - x86_64
22 MB/s |
81 MB
OK, third time is the charm. I finally got the command right.
Everything went just fine.:
sudo dnf --releasever=37 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f37
--enablerepo=updates-testing $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo
--enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) --assumeno distro-sync
On 9/14/22 09:40, Scott Beamer wrote:
I just copied and pasted from the OP...
Ok, but you have to be aware that your email client might reformat the
text and mess up the lines.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe s
I just copied and pasted from the OP...
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List
On Wed, 14 Sep 2022 05:06:29 -
"Richard Myers" wrote:
> This is for F35 -> F37 ...
>
> I sure
> would love it if anybody knows how to fix the below warning(?), which
> shows up every time I run DNF (it has persisted through at least 3 or
> 4 Fedora revisions, maybe more):
>
> Traceback (mos
# dnf --releasever=37 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f37
--enablerepo=updates-testing $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo
--enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) --assumeno distro-sync
Last metadata expiration check: 0:06:44 ago on Wed 14 Sep 2022 02:12:53 PM CEST.
Error:
Probl
Copr repo for Signal-Desktop owned by luminoso
561 B/s | 341 B 00:00
Errors during downloading metadata for repository
'copr:copr
This is for F35 -> F37 ...
Error:
Problem 1: package compat-ffmpeg28-2.8.20-1.fc35.x86_64 requires
libvpx.so.6()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- libvpx-1.10.0-2.fc35.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository
- problem with installed package compat-ffmpeg28-2.8.2
On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 7:06 PM Thomas Link via devel
wrote:
>
> Error:
> Problem 1: package gala-6.3.1-3.fc36.x86_64 requires
> libgnome-desktop-3.so.19()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
> Problem 2: package gala-libs-6.3.1-3.fc36.x86_64 requires
> libmutter-10.so.0()(64bit
On 9/13/22 12:07, Scott Beamer wrote:
# dnf --releasever=37 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f37
--enablerepo=updates-testing \ $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo
--enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) --assumeno distro-sync
bash: --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular: command no
On 9/12/22 22:59, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Do you want to make Fedora 37 better? Please spend 1 minute of your
time and try to run:
I have updated 5 native systems running Fedora 36 (all running Xfce) to
Fedora 37 as follows:
(1) ASUS G750JS 1 x Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4700HQ CPU @ 2.40GHz
Inte
Everything looks good for me. I get notices about packages getting replaced:
evince x86_64
43~alpha-4.fc37
fedora2.0 M
Error:
Problem 1: package flatpak-1.12.7-5.fc36.x86_64 requires
flatpak-session-helper(x86-64) = 1.12.7-5.fc36, but none of the providers can
be installed
- flatpak-session-helper-1.12.7-5.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a
distupgrade repository
- problem with installed package flatpak-1.12
> # dnf --releasever=37 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f37
> --enablerepo=updates-testing \ $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null &&
> echo
> --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) --assumeno distro-sync
> bash: --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular: command not found...
> No such command:
# dnf --releasever=37 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f37
--enablerepo=updates-testing \ $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo
--enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) --assumeno distro-sync
bash: --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular: command not found...
No such command: . Please us
I get the following problems:
Problem 1: package rpmfusion-nonfree-release-36-1.noarch requires
system-release(36), but none of the providers can be installed
- fedora-release-workstation-36-18.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade
repository
- problem with installed package rpmfusion-non
On 9/12/22 08:59, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Do you want to make Fedora 37 better? Please spend 1 minute of your
time and try to run:
# Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
# next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again
sudo dnf module reset '*'
dnf --releas
> Do you want to make Fedora 37 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
> try to run:
Hi. I've got the following errors:
> Error:
> Problem 1: package openjfx-devel-3:11.0.9.2-6.fc35.x86_64 requires
openjfx(x86-64) = 3:11.0.9.2-6.fc35, but none of the providers can be
installed
> - ope
no any problem on this laptop.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelin
I found issues with evolution-rss dependencies. Will report it to them. [root@introdesk ~]# dnf --releasever=37 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f37 --enablerepo=updates-testing $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) --assumeno distro-syncFedora
Error:
Problem 1: package gala-6.3.1-3.fc36.x86_64 requires
libgnome-desktop-3.so.19()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- gnome-desktop3-42.4-1.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade
repository
- problem with installed package gala-6.3.1-3.fc36.x86_64
Problem 2: pac
$ sudo dnf --releasever=37 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f37
--enablerepo=updates-testing $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo
--enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) --assumeno distro-sync
Last metadata expiration check: 0:08:47 ago on Tue 13 Sep 2022 19:34:54.
Error:
Problem
sudo dnf - 1 ST 3 rawhide module_platform_id=platform:f37
--enablerepo=updates-testing $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null &&
echo --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) --assumeno distro-sync
Copr repo for gnome-info-collect owned by vstan 484 B/s | 1.3 kB 00:02
Fedora 37 - x86
> Do you want to make Fedora 37 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
> try to run:
>
> # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
What do you mean by "default modules"?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubsc
On Mon, 2022-09-12 at 14:59 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Do you want to make Fedora 37 better? Please spend 1 minute of your
> time and try to run:
>
> # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
> # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled
> again
> sudo dnf m
What do you mean by "default modules"?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List
Error:
Problem: package nautilus-image-converter-0.3.1-0.22.git430afce31.fc35.x86_64
requires libnautilus-extension.so.1()(64bit), but none of the providers can be
installed
- nautilus-extensions-42.2-1.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade
repository
- problem with installed packag
I've just add --alowerasing for protonvpn...
LANG=C sudo dnf --releasever=37 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f37
--enablerepo=updates-testing $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo
--enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) --assumeno distro-sync --allowerasing;
Installing weak depen
On 13/09/2022 12:15, Mikel Olasagasti wrote:
How should I proceed?
It should be added to fedora-obsolete-packages.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an e
On 13. 09. 22 12:15, Mikel Olasagasti wrote:
Hau idatzi du Miroslav Suchý (msu...@redhat.com) erabiltzaileak (2022
ira. 12, al. (15:00)):
Do you want to make Fedora 37 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
try to run:
# Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
# next time you
Hau idatzi du Miroslav Suchý (msu...@redhat.com) erabiltzaileak (2022
ira. 12, al. (15:00)):
>
> Do you want to make Fedora 37 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
> try to run:
>
> # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
> # next time you run any DNF command default modules wi
In a F36 toolbox:
Transaction Summary
Install 21 Packages
Upgrade588 Packages
Downgrade1 Package
Total download size: 438 M
Operation aborted.
Wants to downgrade grubby. So no issues.
I cannot run this on my actual system because the mirrors I use (which
I hard-coded for bandwidth)
> dnf --releasever=37 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f37 \
> --enablerepo=updates-testing \
> $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo
> --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \
> --assumeno distro-sync
Without modules enabled, works fine here:
dnf --releasever=37 --enablerepo=updat
W dniu 12.09.2022 o 14:59, Miroslav Suchý pisze:
Do you want to make Fedora 37 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time
and try to run:
# Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
# next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again
sudo dnf module reset '*'
dnf --
The only issues I've encountered were related to nautilus extensions.
Bugs are open for all of them and I submitted a PR for an rpmfusion
package.
However, I think that for people on Workstation who
encrypt/decrypt/sign files through nautilus (and who are not
comfortable with a terminal), the loss
On Mon, 12 Sep 2022, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Do you want to make Fedora 37 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
try to run:
In case you hit dependency issues, please report it against the appropriate
package.
Seemed fine. I saw two issues related to python azure packages but since
On 9/12/22 08:59 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
dnf --releasever=37 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f37 \
--enablerepo=updates-testing \
$(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo
--enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \
--assumeno distro-sync
Error:
Problem: package nautilus-dropbox-1:2
Do you want to make Fedora 37 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
try to run:
# Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
# next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again
sudo dnf module reset '*'
dnf --releasever=37 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform
66 matches
Mail list logo
