On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 6:28 AM Jan Staněk wrote:
> Stephen Gallagher writes:
> > That said, I agree that it's completely reasonable to have the default
> > version also `Provides: nodejsXX` and I'll look into it.
>
> Provides is something I did not consider at all, and it looks like the
> easie
Miro Hrončok writes:
> Python does this similarly to nodejs (we have python3.11, pytohn3,
> python3.13 in rawhide today), with one difference. The python3 package
> provides python3.12. So when you do:
>
> requires:
> - python3.12
>
> It just works.
>
> I believe nodejs should provid
Stephen Gallagher writes:
> That said, I agree that it's completely reasonable to have the default
> version also `Provides: nodejsXX` and I'll look into it.
Provides is something I did not consider at all, and it looks like the
easiest way forward! Let me know when you get around to it;
alternat
On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 12:35 PM Jan Staněk wrote:
>
> Hello all,
> recently, when trying to spin up a CI for NodeJS in Fedora, I ran into a
> slight problem: when a NodeJS stream is the default one, versioned
> packages (i.e. nodejs20) are not generated and are not installable.
>
> For example, o
On 20. 03. 24 17:35, Jan Staněk wrote:
Hello all,
recently, when trying to spin up a CI for NodeJS in Fedora, I ran into a
slight problem: when a NodeJS stream is the default one, versioned
packages (i.e. nodejs20) are not generated and are not installable.
For example, on current rawhide, I can
Hello all,
recently, when trying to spin up a CI for NodeJS in Fedora, I ran into a
slight problem: when a NodeJS stream is the default one, versioned
packages (i.e. nodejs20) are not generated and are not installable.
For example, on current rawhide, I cannot install `nodejs20` package,
only `nod
