On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> Ok, reviving this old thread. I got distracted by life and a few other
> things until now.
>
> I saw some other activities going on with gramps but here's my latest
> source RPM with the new build requires and requires as far as I can tell.
Ok, reviving this old thread. I got distracted by life and a few other
things until now.
I saw some other activities going on with gramps but here's my latest
source RPM with the new build requires and requires as far as I can tell. I
left the old ones in commented incase they are actually needed.
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> The requirements from the gramps webpage is a little hard to follow since
> it has information from both 3.X and 4.X but I'm trying to work through it,
> however, looking at the BR in the spec, it seems like there are more than
> typically r
The requirements from the gramps webpage is a little hard to follow since
it has information from both 3.X and 4.X but I'm trying to work through it,
however, looking at the BR in the spec, it seems like there are more than
typically required for a pure python project... I'll look through the setup
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Jon Ciesla
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Speaking as the new gramps maintainer, if the osm-gp
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>> >
>> > Speaking as the new gramps maintainer, if the osm-gps-map Python
>> bindings
>> > were built, I would be happy to test g
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>> >
>> > Speaking as the new gramps maintainer, if the osm-gps-map Python
>> bindings
>> > were built, I would be happy to
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> >
> > Speaking as the new gramps maintainer, if the osm-gps-map Python bindings
> > were built, I would be happy to test gramps with them and switch if they
> > work.
>
> It's my underst
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>
>> I'm pretty sure gramps will, as it was a request from that community
>>
>>> that propmpted me to update osm-gps-map in rawhide.
>>
>>
>
>
>> Speaking as the new gramps maintainer, if th
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>
> Speaking as the new gramps maintainer, if the osm-gps-map Python bindings
> were built, I would be happy to test gramps with them and switch if they
> work.
It's my understanding that with gobject introspection that Python
bindings don't need
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> I'm pretty sure gramps will, as it was a request from that community
>
>> that propmpted me to update osm-gps-map in rawhide.
>
>
> Speaking as the new gramps maintainer, if the osm-gps-map Python bindings
>> were built, I would be happy to t
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 8:19 AM, Richard Shaw
> wrote:
> >
> > Checking my F18 system only two packages require python-osmgpsmap...
> >
> > # repoquery --whatrequires python-osmgpsmap
> > gramps-0:3.4.2-1.fc18.noarch
> > kismon-0:0.6-4.fc18
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 8:19 AM, Richard Shaw
> wrote:
> >
> > Checking my F18 system only two packages require python-osmgpsmap...
> >
> > # repoquery --whatrequires python-osmgpsmap
> > gramps-0:3.4.2-1.fc18.noarch
> > kismon-0:0.6-4.fc18
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 8:19 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> Checking my F18 system only two packages require python-osmgpsmap...
>
> # repoquery --whatrequires python-osmgpsmap
> gramps-0:3.4.2-1.fc18.noarch
> kismon-0:0.6-4.fc18.noarch
>
> I wonder if the current/latest version of gramps and kismon
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 1:34 PM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
> Sorry, just seeing this discussion now. What happened was that the
> newest version of osm-gps-map added gobject introspection, so Python
> bindings can be automatically generated. The older python-osmgpsmap
> bindings I believe are deprec
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 8:06 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 8:46 AM, Michael Schwendt
> wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, 11 Aug 2013 07:58:37 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
>>
>> > Ok, I've been getting these messages for a while but I'm not the package
>> > owner for I didn't worry about it,
On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 8:46 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Aug 2013 07:58:37 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> > Ok, I've been getting these messages for a while but I'm not the package
> > owner for I didn't worry about it, however, it's been a couple of weeks
> so
> > I decided to take a
On Sun, 11 Aug 2013 07:58:37 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> Ok, I've been getting these messages for a while but I'm not the package
> owner for I didn't worry about it, however, it's been a couple of weeks so
> I decided to take a look to see how much work it would be.
You are listed as a co-maint
-- Forwarded message --
From:
Date: Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 7:35 AM
Subject: Broken dependencies: python-osmgpsmap
To: python-osmgpsmap-ow...@fedoraproject.org
python-osmgpsmap has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
python-osmgpsmap-0.7.3-9.fc20.x86_64 requires
19 matches
Mail list logo
