On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 8:46 AM, Michael Schwendt <mschwe...@gmail.com>wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Aug 2013 07:58:37 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: > > > Ok, I've been getting these messages for a while but I'm not the package > > owner for I didn't worry about it, however, it's been a couple of weeks > so > > I decided to take a look to see how much work it would be. > > You are listed as a co-maintainer: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/python-osmgpsmap Exactly, I wasn't sure if the owner had a fix in the works so I didn't want to muck anything up. > Now I'm really confused... There are two separate packages in Fedora: > > osm-gps-map > > python-osmgpsmap > > > > Both point to the same upstream URL. The description from upstream of > > osm-gps-map says it includes python bindings but there is not currently a > > separate sub-package generated... > > > > So what's the deal? Do one of these packages need to be retired? > > No. The wrong %description has been pointed out in the review request. > > Review Request: osm-gps-map - A Gtk+ widget for displaying OpenStreetMap > tiles > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701982 > > Blocks: 702103 > > Bug 702103 - Review Request: python-osmgpsmap - Python bindings for > osm-gps-map GTK+ widget > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702103 More than that, although the description on the upstream site still says there are python bindings, the whole python directory in the source seems to have been removed... Richard
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
