On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 09:06 -0700, John Reiser wrote:
> I disagree with the resource allocation decision that RV280 is not worthy
> of the attention that is necessary to provide the functionality required by
> Gnome3.
Of the approximately nine functionally different generations of radeons
on the
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 10:21:16 -0700,
John Reiser wrote:
On 08/16/2012 08:52 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 10:13:14 -0400,
Adam Jackson wrote:
Even where you guys couldn't get stuff working, I have gotten work around
advice. For example, Airlie told me how to dis
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 12:28:43PM -0700, John Reiser wrote:
> Something good enough so that the combination of {kernel, Xorg server,
> Xorg device driver} would satisfy Gnome3's desires for a display
> that did not suffer fallback mode.
Vesa should already be running llvmpipe and not triggering
On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 12:28 -0700, John Reiser wrote:
> On 08/16/2012 11:55 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 07:31:39AM -0700, John Reiser wrote:
> >> What about a "KMS vesafb"?
>
> > What would a KMS vesafb even be?
>
> Something good enough so that the combination of {kern
On 08/16/2012 11:55 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 07:31:39AM -0700, John Reiser wrote:
>
>> The wiki page says that the ServerKMSDrivers are 100% implemented,
>> so they should be testable in F-18 Alpha.
>> However, the wiki page also says "MGA SE or AST" only.
>> What about
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 07:31:39AM -0700, John Reiser wrote:
> The wiki page says that the ServerKMSDrivers are 100% implemented,
> so they should be testable in F-18 Alpha.
> However, the wiki page also says "MGA SE or AST" only.
> What about a "KMS vesafb"?
What would a KMS vesafb even be?
--
On 08/16/2012 08:52 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 10:13:14 -0400,
> Adam Jackson wrote:
> Even where you guys couldn't get stuff working, I have gotten work around
> advice. For example, Airlie told me how to disable AGP in order to prevent
> lockups on my rv280. Other
On 08/16/2012 07:52 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 07:47 -0700, John Reiser wrote:
>
>> New Radeon 9250 cards [RV280] were advertised by Fry's Electronics on August
>> 3;
>> advantages: $50 cheap, perhaps low profile, perhaps available in AGP.
>> There are thousands of such cards
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 10:13:14 -0400,
Adam Jackson wrote:
Yeah, sorry that the devices that need the most work are the ones that
get the most work. In the future we'll be sure to focus on end-of-lifed
hardware with feature-complete drivers.
Even where you guys couldn't get stuff working,
On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 07:47 -0700, John Reiser wrote:
> New Radeon 9250 cards [RV280] were advertised by Fry's Electronics on August
> 3;
> advantages: $50 cheap, perhaps low profile, perhaps available in AGP.
> There are thousands of such cards appearing in used equipment channels
> because of t
On 08/16/2012 07:13 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-08-09 at 09:11 -0700, John Reiser wrote:
>> In practice for the last 2 years, I notice that X11 pays little attention
>> to anything except the "big 3": current Radeon, nVidia, and Intel graphics.
>> "3D" [alpha blending, etc.] has taken d
On 08/16/2012 06:24 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
>> This is an ordinary bug, probably in some X11 driver, perhaps
>> mach64_drv.
>> In practice for the last 2 years, I notice that X11 pays little
>> attention
>> to anything except the "big 3": current Radeon, nVidia, and Intel
>> graphics.
>> "3D" [a
On Thu, 2012-08-09 at 09:11 -0700, John Reiser wrote:
> > In the X.log I see:
> >
> > [ 182.375] Backtrace:
> > [ 182.375] 0: Xorg (xorg_backtrace+0x36) [0x464d46]
> > [ 182.375] 1: Xorg (0x40+0x69d99) [0x469d99]
> > [ 182.375] 2: /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (0x7f315a2bf000
> This is an ordinary bug, probably in some X11 driver, perhaps
> mach64_drv.
> In practice for the last 2 years, I notice that X11 pays little
> attention
> to anything except the "big 3": current Radeon, nVidia, and Intel
> graphics.
> "3D" [alpha blending, etc.] has taken developer resources awa
On 08/09/2012 01:04 PM, Jos Vos wrote:
"--yesiknowwhatiamdoingbutitaketherisk" ;-).
I think you misspelled %pre
:)
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- FreedomĀ² is a feature!
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 11:29:10AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> "Implementing growing of raid partitions such that an arbitrary number
> of partitions always grow at the same rate and end up the same size is
> quite difficult. There are just more important things that we need to
> work on.
Hmm
On Thu, 2012-08-09 at 19:51 +0200, Jos Vos wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 09:48:19AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > A wild shot in the dark, but not
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F17_bugs#ksdevice-case-sensitive ?
> > I wrote that because we had one person who was using
> > 'ksd
On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 09:48:19AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> A wild shot in the dark, but not
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F17_bugs#ksdevice-case-sensitive ?
> I wrote that because we had one person who was using
> 'ksdevice=BOOTIF'...
Too easy... no, the boot cmdline is correct
On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 09:11:42AM -0700, John Reiser wrote:
> > The system has 3 NIC's, 2x Broadcom BCM5704 and 1x Netgear GA630.
> > I use a BCM5704 for network install. This works fine on CentOS with
> > ksdevice=link. With F17 I see multiple dhcp being started, resulting
> > in multiple time
On Thu, 2012-08-09 at 17:04 +0200, Jos Vos wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When trying to do a test install of F17 on server hardware (a dual
> AMD Opteron system from 2006 with 1 GB of memory), I noticed several
> issues, while CentOS 6.3 installs fine. So I want to share my
> experiences, ask for your feedbac
> (1)
> The system has 3 NIC's, 2x Broadcom BCM5704 and 1x Netgear GA630.
> I use a BCM5704 for network install. This works fine on CentOS with
> ksdevice=link. With F17 I see multiple dhcp being started, resulting
> in multiple timeouts (I even see a second dhcp being started for em2
> while jus
Hi,
When trying to do a test install of F17 on server hardware (a dual
AMD Opteron system from 2006 with 1 GB of memory), I noticed several
issues, while CentOS 6.3 installs fine. So I want to share my
experiences, ask for your feedback, and then file bugs when needed.
There are 3 major issues,
22 matches
Mail list logo