On 28.04.2011 18:59, Tim Flink wrote:
> On 04/28/2011 02:00 AM, Kamil Paral wrote:
>>> Keeping the current way will just make me (and possibly others)
>>> add filters to throw away messages from AutoQA. Please be aware of
>>> how much contributor time you waste by making them hope through
>>> usele
On 04/28/2011 02:00 AM, Kamil Paral wrote:
>> Keeping the current way will just make me (and possibly others)
>> add filters to throw away messages from AutoQA. Please be aware of
>> how much contributor time you waste by making them hope through
>> useless (because the tests have passed and no inf
> Keeping the current way will just make me (and possibly others) add
> filters to throw away messages from AutoQA. Please be aware of how
> much
> contributor time you waste by making them hope through useless
> (because
> the tests have passed and no information is gained) mails. I realize
> you
On 04/27/2011 03:00 PM, James Laska wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 21:03 +0200, Tim Niemueller wrote:
>> On 27.04.2011 15:38, Kamil Paral wrote:
- Post only errors It is common, for example, in automated build or
continuous integration systems to send out emails only on errors.
On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 21:03 +0200, Tim Niemueller wrote:
> On 27.04.2011 15:38, Kamil Paral wrote:
> >>
> >> - Post only errors It is common, for example, in automated build or
> >> continuous integration systems to send out emails only on errors.
> >> Similar goes for Unix tools, which tend to be
On 27.04.2011 15:38, Kamil Paral wrote:
>>
>> - Post only errors It is common, for example, in automated build or
>> continuous integration systems to send out emails only on errors.
>> Similar goes for Unix tools, which tend to be quiet if everything
>> is ok, and only bother you with output if s
> Hi fellow Fedorans.
>
> Recently, AutoQA has been introduced to catch typical problems early
> in
> the update process. In general, I appreciate that effort, but
> currently
> I find myself in a phase of conditioning ignorance towards AutoQA,
> essentially because it is drowning me in irrelevant
Hi fellow Fedorans.
Recently, AutoQA has been introduced to catch typical problems early in
the update process. In general, I appreciate that effort, but currently
I find myself in a phase of conditioning ignorance towards AutoQA,
essentially because it is drowning me in irrelevant information. Th
