Re: [fedora-java] Re: java stack is dead, long live the javastack (was "500 packages FTBFS in rawhide with java-11-openjdk as system JDK")

On 7/1/20 4:09 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 4:00 PM Jiri Vanek wrote: >> >> On 7/1/20 3:21 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote: >>> On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 3:09 PM Aleksandar Kurtakov >>> wrote: Fabio, does it mean that the Java SIG agrees with progressing with the Ch

Re: [fedora-java] Re: java stack is dead, long live the javastack (was "500 packages FTBFS in rawhide with java-11-openjdk as system JDK")

On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 4:00 PM Jiri Vanek wrote: > > On 7/1/20 3:21 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 3:09 PM Aleksandar Kurtakov > > wrote: > >> > >> Fabio, does it mean that the Java SIG agrees with progressing with the > >> Change to Java 11 as a default? > > > > Speaking

Re: [fedora-java] Re: java stack is dead, long live the javastack (was "500 packages FTBFS in rawhide with java-11-openjdk as system JDK")

On 7/1/20 3:21 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 3:09 PM Aleksandar Kurtakov > wrote: >> >> Fabio, does it mean that the Java SIG agrees with progressing with the >> Change to Java 11 as a default? > > Speaking for myself, yes. > > I can't speak for all other SIG members (we

Re: [fedora-java] Re: java stack is dead, long live the javastack (was "500 packages FTBFS in rawhide with java-11-openjdk as system JDK")

; > Subject: Re: [fedora-java] Re: java stack is dead, long live the > javastack (was "500 packages FTBFS in rawhide with > > java-11-openjdk as system JDK") > > > > On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 3:09 PM Aleksandar Kurtakov > > wrote: > > > > > &

Re: [fedora-java] Re: java stack is dead, long live the javastack (was "500 packages FTBFS in rawhide with java-11-openjdk as system JDK")

- Original Message - > From: "Fabio Valentini" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Sent: Wednesday, July 1, 2020 9:21:31 AM > Subject: Re: [fedora-java] Re: java stack is dead, long live the javastack > (was "500 packages

Re: [fedora-java] Re: java stack is dead, long live the javastack (was "500 packages FTBFS in rawhide with java-11-openjdk as system JDK")

On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 3:09 PM Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote: > > Fabio, does it mean that the Java SIG agrees with progressing with the Change > to Java 11 as a default? Speaking for myself, yes. I can't speak for all other SIG members (we haven't formally voted on this or something like that), bu

Re: [fedora-java] Re: java stack is dead, long live the javastack (was "500 packages FTBFS in rawhide with java-11-openjdk as system JDK")

Fabio, does it mean that the Java SIG agrees with progressing with the Change to Java 11 as a default? On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 4:02 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 9:52 AM Jiri Vanek wrote: > > > > On 6/29/20 1:59 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 2

Re: [fedora-java] Re: java stack is dead, long live the javastack (was "500 packages FTBFS in rawhide with java-11-openjdk as system JDK")

On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 9:52 AM Jiri Vanek wrote: > > On 6/29/20 1:59 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 2:39 PM Jiri Vanek > > wrote: > > > > Current stats from my testing samples: > > 408 failing > > 263 passing > > > > > > A

Re: [fedora-java] java stack is dead, long live the javastack (was "500 packages FTBFS in rawhide with java-11-openjdk as system JDK")

On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 2:39 PM Jiri Vanek wrote: > Current stats from my testing samples: > 408 failing > 263 passing > > That is huge improvement. Thank you all. > I'm now running last rebuild n copr, and in week or two an mass rebuild > will be taken in koji. > > There was an discussion what t

Re: [fedora-java] Re: java stack is dead, long live the javastack (was "500 packages FTBFS in rawhide with java-11-openjdk as system JDK")

On 6/29/20 1:59 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 2:39 PM Jiri Vanek > wrote: > > Current stats from my testing samples: > 408 failing > 263 passing > > > Are these numbers reversed ^^^ ? Looking at > https://copr.fedorainfraclo

Re: [fedora-java] java stack is dead, long live the javastack (was "500 packages FTBFS in rawhide with java-11-openjdk as system JDK")

On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 2:39 PM Jiri Vanek wrote: > Current stats from my testing samples: > 408 failing > 263 passing > > Are these numbers reversed ^^^ ? Looking at https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/java-maint-sig/java-11-default/monitor/ I see a bit more than 200 ftbfs. > That is hug

java stack is dead, long live the javastack (was "500 packages FTBFS in rawhide with java-11-openjdk as system JDK")

Current stats from my testing samples: 408 failing 263 passing That is huge improvement. Thank you all. I'm now running last rebuild n copr, and in week or two an mass rebuild will be taken in koji. There was an discussion what the border will be, when to force this change, or when to step away

Re: 500 packages FTBFS in rawhide with java-11-openjdk as system JDK

On 6/10/20 8:14 AM, Ondrej Dubaj wrote: > Hi, > > after discussion with upstream mysql-connector-java is not able to be build > with jdk-11, as the code > contains deprecated API. that is sad. What is longterm goal of mysql-connector-java? You have to move it to live with java-1.8.0-openjdk-de

Re: 500 packages FTBFS in rawhide with java-11-openjdk as system JDK

Hi, after discussion with upstream mysql-connector-java is not able to be build with jdk-11, as the code contains deprecated API. Reference here: https://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=99750 Best regards, Ondrej On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 6:42 PM Jiri Vanek wrote: > On 6/9/20 5:07 PM, Fabio Valentini

Re: 500 packages FTBFS in rawhide with java-11-openjdk as system JDK

On 6/9/20 5:07 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 4:52 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 4:05 PM Jiri Vanek wrote: >>> Please see >>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Java11#common_issues_packagers_can_face_and_gathered_solutions >>> Please fix your pac

Re: [fedora-java] 500 packages FTBFS in rawhide with java-11-openjdk as system JDK

On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 6:34 PM Jiri Vanek wrote: > > On 6/9/20 4:42 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote: > > Hey Jiri, > > Please guide me how to find the actual build failure log. I tried finding > > the ant one but didn't > > succeed yet > > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jvanek/java11/pack

Re: [fedora-java] 500 packages FTBFS in rawhide with java-11-openjdk as system JDK

On 6/9/20 4:42 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote: > Hey Jiri, > Please guide me how to find the actual build failure log. I tried finding the > ant one but didn't > succeed yet > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jvanek/java11/package/ant/ Hi! I think I'm not guilty. it looks like fedora inf

Re: 500 packages FTBFS in rawhide with java-11-openjdk as system JDK

On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 4:52 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 4:05 PM Jiri Vanek wrote: > > Please see > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Java11#common_issues_packagers_can_face_and_gathered_solutions > > Please fix your packages according to > > https://fedoraproject.o

Re: 500 packages FTBFS in rawhide with java-11-openjdk as system JDK

On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 4:05 PM Jiri Vanek wrote: > Please see > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Java11#common_issues_packagers_can_face_and_gathered_solutions > Please fix your packages according to > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Java11#copr_preliminary_rebuild > Inidivdual packag

Re: [fedora-java] 500 packages FTBFS in rawhide with java-11-openjdk as system JDK

Hey Jiri, Please guide me how to find the actual build failure log. I tried finding the ant one but didn't succeed yet https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jvanek/java11/package/ant/ On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 5:05 PM Jiri Vanek wrote: > > > Please see > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/J

500 packages FTBFS in rawhide with java-11-openjdk as system JDK

Please see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Java11#common_issues_packagers_can_face_and_gathered_solutions Please fix your packages according to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Java11#copr_preliminary_rebuild Inidivdual packagers are being emailed with details Maintainers by package