On 7/1/20 3:21 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 3:09 PM Aleksandar Kurtakov <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> Fabio, does it mean that the Java SIG agrees with progressing with the >> Change to Java 11 as a default? > > Speaking for myself, yes. > > I can't speak for all other SIG members (we haven't formally voted on > this or something like that), but from conversations we've had I > gather that all active package maintainers are looking forward to > finally getting Java 11 by default.
Yes, despite many soon FTBFS and thus soon orphaned pkgs, It looks taht active people wish to proceed with change, rather then doing the possibly clumsy step back. I'm progressing toward the mass rebuild in side tag. I'm aware about three packages needing commits to change - java-11-openjdk, java-1.8.0-openjdk and javapackages-tools. Fabio, saying "you have not got xmvn change", Is tere something I need to check for? Thanx! J. > > Fabio > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] > -- Jiri Vanek Senior QE engineer, OpenJDK QE lead, Mgr. Red Hat Czech [email protected] M: +420775390109 _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
