Isn't it time for v4 ?
Alex
- Original Message -
> From: "Michael Schwendt"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 12:38:12 PM
> Subject: Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v3] Retiring packages for F-17
>
> On Mon, 30 Jan 201
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 15:33:39 -0800, AW (Adam) wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-01-29 at 22:21 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>
> > > What's needed to be sure the bug doesn't get closed is for the Version
> > > field to be bumped to a release that's not going EOL. A comment may do
> > > the job, but there's
On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 00:04 +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> - for which nobody (neither the reporter nor the co-owners, nor anyone
> else) has bumped the Release: field as requested by the automated
> script
One thing that bugs me here is that permissions on Bugzilla are somewhat
tighter than I'd
On Sun, 2012-01-29 at 22:21 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > What's needed to be sure the bug doesn't get closed is for the Version
> > field to be bumped to a release that's not going EOL. A comment may do
> > the job, but there's usually hundreds of bugs in the list to be EOLed
> > and it's us
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 11:01 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Michael Schwendt wrote:
>> Or a keyword that would exclude the ticket from the compiled list
>> automatically? If a second search on all tickets with that keyword
>> results in hundreds or thousands of ticket numbers, that should raise
>> an
Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Or a keyword that would exclude the ticket from the compiled list
> automatically? If a second search on all tickets with that keyword
> results in hundreds or thousands of ticket numbers, that should raise
> an alarm-bell.
If you set release to rawhide and add the Future
On Sun, 29 Jan 2012 09:23:19 -0800, AW (Adam) wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-01-28 at 20:43 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>
> > Then you have misunderstood it, unfortunately. I'm not against EOL ticket
> > cleanup procedures in general. I'm against closing tickets repeatedly
> > after it has been shown t
On Sat, 2012-01-28 at 20:43 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Then you have misunderstood it, unfortunately. I'm not against EOL ticket
> cleanup procedures in general. I'm against closing tickets repeatedly
> after it has been shown that an issue is still present in the current dist
> and nobody h
On Sat, 28 Jan 2012 09:02:50 -0800, AW (Adam) wrote:
> > The bugzilla account called "Bug Zapper" is a human-being not a script?
> > Unbelievable.
>
> We run a search to identify the bugs to be closed (it's a stored search
> in Bugzilla), manually weed the list, and then send the list to
> engine
Adam Williamson wrote:
> Just to note, in case anyone wondered, as I have something of a dog in
> the compiz fight: I did consider taking these but can't honestly commit
> to having enough time to maintain them decently. Since Canonical hired
> the main Compiz developer it does seem to be the case
On Thu, 2012-01-26 at 14:58 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Orphan ccsm
> Orphan compiz
> Orphan compiz-bcop
> Orphan compiz-fusion-extras
> Orphan compiz-fusion-unsupported
> Orphan compiz-manager
> Orphan compizconfig-backend-gconf
> Orphan compizconfig-backend-kconfig4
> Orphan compizconfig-pyt
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 10:04:23 +0100,
Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:56:39 -0600, BWI (Bruno) wrote:
>
> > > Orphan xmms-pulse
> >
> > Since I actually use xmms, I'm taking xmms-pulse.
>
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-January/161136.html
Thanks for
On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:56:39 -0600, BWI (Bruno) wrote:
> > Orphan xmms-pulse
>
> Since I actually use xmms, I'm taking xmms-pulse.
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-January/161136.html
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 02:58:59PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Orphan techtalk-pse
I have taken this. Currently it FTBFS because a critical dependency
was dropped from Fedora, however I have patches upstream (not applied
to git yet) which fix this.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Gr
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 14:58:59 -0500,
Bill Nottingham wrote:
> If these packages are not claimed, they will be retired shortly before
> the mass branch for Fedora 17 on February 7th.
> Orphan xmms-pulse
Since I actually use xmms, I'm taking xmms-pulse.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedor
Took libmodelfile and sage.
-J
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Each release, before branching, we block currently orphaned packages.
It's that time again for Fedora 17.
New this go-round is that we are also blocking packages that have
failed to build since before Fedora 15.
The following packages are currently orphaned, or fail to build. If
you have a need f
17 matches
Mail list logo
