I took csstidy.
04.08.2010 20:32, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Each release, we undergo the effort to track down owners for orphaned
> packages in the release, and block those orphaned packages where
> necessary. It's that time again for Fedora 14.
>
> The following packages are currently orphaned and
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 10:56 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
>> While the XO-1 is a comparitatively relative higher HW spec (433 mhz
>> from memory, so not massive but still double) it might be a worthwhile
>> canditdate as there's quite a few of them around the community for
pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
> While the XO-1 is a comparitatively relative higher HW spec (433 mhz
> from memory, so not massive but still double) it might be a worthwhile
> canditdate as there's quite a few of them around the community for
> testing, its not overly powerful and sees similar issues
On Fri, 2010-08-06 at 11:21 +0100, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 2:04 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 10:46 +, Petr Pisar wrote:
> >
> >> PulseAudio is interresting project, but it's absolutely unusable on old
> >> slow hardware. Last time I checked
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Petr Pisar (ppi...@redhat.com) said:
>> > I suggest that these be just built without NAS support. NAS is basically an
>> > older competitor to PulseAudio with fewer features (it focuses on network
>> > transparency, which is just one of the
Petr Pisar (ppi...@redhat.com) said:
> > I suggest that these be just built without NAS support. NAS is basically an
> > older competitor to PulseAudio with fewer features (it focuses on network
> > transparency, which is just one of the things PulseAudio does), it is not
> > compatible with Pu
On 08/05/2010 10:13 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> Excerpts from Chen Lei's message of Thu Aug 05 09:10:25 +0200 2010:
>> It seems a lot of java packages will be orphaned, should we contact
>> JAVA-SIG and maven2/eclipse/intellij-idea maintainers?
>
> Unfortunately there is no JAVA-SIG though I
Adam Williamson writes:
> PA uses a more correct but more CPU-intensive resampling method than
> ALSA by default. On very slow systems it's a good idea to
> edit /etc/pulse/daemon.conf and change the 'resample-method' parameter.
Back when I had a slow enough machine to care (A Sempron 2600+ I
be
On Fri, 06 Aug 2010 14:11:20 -0400, Matthias wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 12:32 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>
> > Unblocked orphan librsvg2
>
> I've taken ownership of this now, since dropping it is not an option. If
> anybody else wants to maintain the package, please let me know, I'm
> hap
On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 12:32 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Unblocked orphan librsvg2
I've taken ownership of this now, since dropping it is not an option. If
anybody else wants to maintain the package, please let me know, I'm
happy to give it up to good hands.
--
devel mailing list
devel@list
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 11:21:26AM +0100, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 2:04 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 10:46 +, Petr Pisar wrote:
> >
> >> PulseAudio is interresting project, but it's absolutely unusable on old
> >> slow hardware. Last time I c
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 2:04 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 10:46 +, Petr Pisar wrote:
>
>> PulseAudio is interresting project, but it's absolutely unusable on old
>> slow hardware. Last time I checked it out on Pentium TSC (no MMX)
>> running at 200 MHz, it consumed 20 % of
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 01:34:30AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Petr Pisar wrote:
> > PulseAudio is interresting project, but it's absolutely unusable on old
> > slow hardware. Last time I checked it out on Pentium TSC (no MMX)
> > running at 200 MHz,
>
> Fedora doesn't support that hardware anymo
On 2010-08-05, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Petr Pisar wrote:
>> PulseAudio is interresting project, but it's absolutely unusable on old
>> slow hardware. Last time I checked it out on Pentium TSC (no MMX)
>> running at 200 MHz,
>
> Fedora doesn't support that hardware anymore (the minimum is i686 = Pent
On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 10:46 +, Petr Pisar wrote:
> PulseAudio is interresting project, but it's absolutely unusable on old
> slow hardware. Last time I checked it out on Pentium TSC (no MMX)
> running at 200 MHz, it consumed 20 % of CPU just in idle mode. While
> `playing', it congested CPU, p
Petr Pisar wrote:
> PulseAudio is interresting project, but it's absolutely unusable on old
> slow hardware. Last time I checked it out on Pentium TSC (no MMX)
> running at 200 MHz,
Fedora doesn't support that hardware anymore (the minimum is i686 = Pentium
Pro).
Kevin Kofler
--
devel
Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Does anybody think the same about EsounD?
> We still include it in Fedora. We still build lots of audio packages
> for it. But is it still being used by anyone?
PulseAudio emulates the ESounD protocol and for some legacy applications
(not even all proprietary), it's the
On 08/04/2010 12:32 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Each release, we undergo the effort to track down owners for orphaned
> packages in the release, and block those orphaned packages where
> necessary. It's that time again for Fedora 14.
>
minirpc was orphaned because development has stopped upstrea
On Thu, 05.08.10 12:58, Michael Schwendt (mschwe...@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Aug 2010 10:46:42 + (UTC), Petr wrote:
>
> > I agree NAS is very old audio system, but it has history. It works (or
> > should work) across operating systems (do not think only about Linux).
> > In addition it s
On 2010-08-05, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Aug 2010 10:46:42 + (UTC), Petr wrote:
>
>> I agree NAS is very old audio system, but it has history. It works (or
>> should work) across operating systems (do not think only about Linux).
>> In addition it supports bidirectional sound transmi
On Thu, 5 Aug 2010 10:46:42 + (UTC), Petr wrote:
> I agree NAS is very old audio system, but it has history. It works (or
> should work) across operating systems (do not think only about Linux).
> In addition it supports bidirectional sound transmission (from
> microphone).
>
> PulseAudio is
On 2010-08-04, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Bill Nottingham wrote:
>> Orphan: nas
>> gstreamer-plugins-bad-free requires nas-devel = 1.9.1-6.fc12
>> gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-extras requires libaudio.so.2
>> speech-dispatcher requires libaudio.so.2
>> speech-dispatcher requires nas-devel
Excerpts from Chen Lei's message of Thu Aug 05 09:10:25 +0200 2010:
> It seems a lot of java packages will be orphaned, should we contact
> JAVA-SIG and maven2/eclipse/intellij-idea maintainers?
Unfortunately there is no JAVA-SIG though I was thinking about starting
one. There has been some effort
It seems a lot of java packages will be orphaned, should we contact
JAVA-SIG and maven2/eclipse/intellij-idea maintainers?
Regrads,
Chen Lei
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 08/04/2010 06:32 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Unblocked orphan perl-Geo-IPfree
> Unblocked orphan perl-libwhisker2
I can take these two.
--
Marcela Mašláňová
BaseOS team Brno
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
2010/8/5 Kevin Kofler :
> Bill Nottingham wrote:
>> Orphan: nas
>> gstreamer-plugins-bad-free requires nas-devel = 1.9.1-6.fc12
>> gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-extras requires libaudio.so.2
>> speech-dispatcher requires libaudio.so.2
>> speech-dispatcher requires nas-devel = 1.9.1-6.f
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 12:37 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Bill Nottingham wrote:
>> Orphan: nas
>> gstreamer-plugins-bad-free requires nas-devel = 1.9.1-6.fc12
>> gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-extras requires libaudio.so.2
>> speech-dispatcher requires libaudio.so.2
>> speech-dispatcher
Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Orphan: nas
> gstreamer-plugins-bad-free requires nas-devel = 1.9.1-6.fc12
> gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-extras requires libaudio.so.2
> speech-dispatcher requires libaudio.so.2
> speech-dispatcher requires nas-devel = 1.9.1-6.fc12
I suggest that these be ju
Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Unblocked orphan xautolock
I use this; taken. Co-maints welcome.
--Ben
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 07:00:16PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> | xiphmont's Info | xiphmont's Packages (328)
> | https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/xiphmont
>
> How is that package count to be interpreted?
It is the amount of all packages that match any of the selected fi
Hi,
pycairo has *14* co-maintainers, one of them should step up and take
ownership.
I took gconfmm26 (required by bakery and glom), glademm24 (bakery), as
usual co-maintainers are welcome.
best regards,
H.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailm
> "MS" == Michael Schwendt writes:
MS> More than a dozen Red Hat people with "commit" access, but access
MS> was "denied" to one other Red Hat employee. Why?
You'll find that for some odd reason xiphmont has commit set to "Denied"
on several packages. I've never understood why it ended up t
Michael Schwendt (mschwe...@gmail.com) said:
> > Unblocked orphan librsvg2
>
> What's going on here?
The procedure used to be for various gnome-y packages in the days
before provenpackager to just assign a single maintainer and
a whole slew of co-maintainers, so anyone in the Desktop SIG could
u
On Wed, 4 Aug 2010 12:32:23 -0400, Bill wrote:
> Unblocked orphan librsvg2
What's going on here?
More than a dozen Red Hat people with "commit" access, but access
was "denied" to one other Red Hat employee. Why?
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/librsvg2
| xiphmont's Info | xiphmo
34 matches
Mail list logo
