On Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 10:18:48PM +0200, Chitlesh GOORAH wrote:
> Hello there,
>
> It seems that guile-gnome-platform should be unblocked as well.
>
> >
> > Hello there,
> >
> > I wish to take ownership of gnusim8085 and gwave.
> > Can you please grant me the "Take Ownership" for the respective
Hello there,
It seems that guile-gnome-platform should be unblocked as well.
thank you
Chitlesh
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 7:39 PM, Chitlesh GOORAH
wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>> Each release, before branching, we block currently orphaned packages.
>> It's that
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Each release, before branching, we block currently orphaned packages.
> It's that time again for Fedora 16.
>
> New this go-round is that we are also blocking packages that have
> failed to build since before Fedora 14.
>
> The following pa
Honza Horak (hho...@redhat.com) said:
> Hm, a bad thing has happened during my vacation, I haven't noticed my
> package cdrdao/gcdmaster is in the list and now I have a FTBFS problem.
>
> So I can take these packages if it's not too late yet:
>
> libgnomeuimm26
> libgnomemm26
> gnome-vfsmm26
>
Hm, a bad thing has happened during my vacation, I haven't noticed my
package cdrdao/gcdmaster is in the list and now I have a FTBFS problem.
So I can take these packages if it's not too late yet:
libgnomeuimm26
libgnomemm26
gnome-vfsmm26
Is it possible to unblock these packages somehow easily
Am Mittwoch, 20 Juli 2011 15:28:05 schrieb Bill Nottingham:
BN> Orphan: libglfw
BN> hosts3d requires libglfw.so.2.6
BN> hosts3d requires libglfw-devel = 2.6-6.fc15
BN> hosts3d-sampler requires libglfw.so.2.6
BN> taoframework-glfw requires libglfw = 2.6-6.fc15
hosts3d can't be in af
On 7/28/11 9:02 AM, Till Maas wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 09:29:40AM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
>> On 7/26/11 8:48 AM, Till Maas wrote:
>>> I hereby propose to change this in the future and explicitly CC
>>> comaintainers to make them aware that their package is orphaned.
>>
>> This can easil
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 09:29:40AM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On 7/26/11 8:48 AM, Till Maas wrote:
> > I hereby propose to change this in the future and explicitly CC
> > comaintainers to make them aware that their package is orphaned.
>
> This can easily be done by just mailing
> -ow...@fedor
Marc Grimme (gri...@atix.de) said:
> I've done this but could not take over the ownership for Fedora-devel. It's
> still orphaned there.
Correct, because the packages have already been blocked as stated in the
mail.
> I also got reminders from rawhide that the dependent packages could not be
>
- "Toshio Kuratomi" wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 01:56:36PM +0200, Marc Grimme wrote:
> > - "Bill Nottingham" wrote:
> >
> > > Orphan comoonics-base-py
> > > comaintained by: elcody02
> > I'm co maintaining this package and it is required for the packages
> comoonics-cdsl-py and co
> - Ursprüngliche Nachricht -
> Von: Peter Robinson
> Gesendet: 27.07.11 10:09 Uhr
> An: Development discussions related to Fedora
> Betreff: Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages in F-16 (final warning)
>
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 8:13 PM, Fabian Deutsch wrote:
&g
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 8:13 PM, Fabian Deutsch wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 26.07.2011, 11:28 -0400 schrieb Bill Nottingham:
> > Fabian Deutsch (fabian.deut...@gmx.de) said:
> > > It seems as if my first mail (from 12 days ago) got lost:
> > > I can take
> > >
> > > > Orphan link-grammar
> >
> > It'
Am Dienstag, den 26.07.2011, 11:28 -0400 schrieb Bill Nottingham:
> Fabian Deutsch (fabian.deut...@gmx.de) said:
> > It seems as if my first mail (from 12 days ago) got lost:
> > I can take
> >
> > > Orphan link-grammar
>
> It's not a matter of can you; you need to go to pkgdb to claim it. (Sor
On 7/26/11 8:48 AM, Till Maas wrote:
> I hereby propose to change this in the future and explicitly CC
> comaintainers to make them aware that their package is orphaned.
This can easily be done by just mailing
-ow...@fedoraproject.org It will get to all co-maintainers.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 03:51:16PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Till Maas (opensou...@till.name) said:
> > Just wondering: Did the comaintainers get a copy of this mail?
>
> Only inasmuch as they're subscribed to devel@.
I hereby propose to change this in the future and explicitly CC
comaint
Fabian Deutsch (fabian.deut...@gmx.de) said:
> It seems as if my first mail (from 12 days ago) got lost:
> I can take
>
> > Orphan link-grammar
It's not a matter of can you; you need to go to pkgdb to claim it. (Sorry
if the original mail didn't make this clear.)
Bill
--
devel mailing list
de
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 01:56:36PM +0200, Marc Grimme wrote:
> - "Bill Nottingham" wrote:
>
> > Each release, before branching, we block currently orphaned packages.
> > It's that time again for Fedora 16.
> >
> > New this go-round is that we are also blocking packages that have
> > failed t
- "Bill Nottingham" wrote:
> Each release, before branching, we block currently orphaned packages.
> It's that time again for Fedora 16.
>
> New this go-round is that we are also blocking packages that have
> failed to build since before Fedora 14.
>
> The following packages are currently o
Hello,
It seems as if my first mail (from 12 days ago) got lost:
I can take
> Orphan link-grammar
- fabian
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Till Maas (opensou...@till.name) said:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 03:28:05PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > Each release, before branching, we block currently orphaned packages.
> > It's that time again for Fedora 16.
> >
> > New this go-round is that we are also blocking packages that have
> >
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 20:52:47 +0100,
Richard Fearn wrote:
> > Orphan notecase
>
> I think this one is being retired due to a FTBFS, which could easily be fixed:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716193#c7
Except that being FTBFS for a long time is also a good indication that
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 03:28:05PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Each release, before branching, we block currently orphaned packages.
> It's that time again for Fedora 16.
>
> New this go-round is that we are also blocking packages that have
> failed to build since before Fedora 14.
>
> The fo
2011/7/20 Bill Nottingham :
> Each release, before branching, we block currently orphaned packages.
> It's that time again for Fedora 16.
>
> New this go-round is that we are also blocking packages that have
> failed to build since before Fedora 14.
>
> The following packages are currently orphaned
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 8:28 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Each release, before branching, we block currently orphaned packages.
> It's that time again for Fedora 16.
>
> New this go-round is that we are also blocking packages that have
> failed to build since before Fedora 14.
>
> The following p
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 8:28 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Orphan libsoup22
I am extremely reluctantly taking this as I maintain buoh which
depends on it. If I can verify that buoh works with the current
version of libsoup, I'll orphan it again.
Jonathan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedora
> Orphan notecase
I think this one is being retired due to a FTBFS, which could easily be fixed:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716193#c7
Rich
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi,
> Orphan whowatch
I've taken this one.
Rich
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
I'll take xmltooling and opensaml (rawhide branches).
I have no intention to get ownership of EPEL branches.
Regards,
Guido
--
Guido Grazioli
Via Parri 11 48011 - Alfonsine (RA)
Mobile: +39 347 1017202 (10-18)
Key FP = 7040 F398 0DED A737 7337 DAE1 12DC A698 5E81 2278
Linked in: http://www.li
I'll take slim.
Regards, Pavel Zhukov.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Bill Nottingham venit, vidit, dixit 20.07.2011 21:28:
> Each release, before branching, we block currently orphaned packages.
> It's that time again for Fedora 16.
>
> New this go-round is that we are also blocking packages that have
> failed to build since before Fedora 14.
>
> The following pac
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 03:28:05PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Each release, before branching, we block currently orphaned packages.
> It's that time again for Fedora 16.
>
> New this go-round is that we are also blocking packages that have
> failed to build since before Fedora 14.
>
> The fo
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 03:41:28PM -0400, Casey Dahlin wrote:
> > Orphan rubygem-rcov
>
> Oh, missed that one. I'll definitely take that.
>
> --CJD
Never mind. It has been snatched up already.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/d
> Orphan rubygem-rcov
Oh, missed that one. I'll definitely take that.
--CJD
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Wed, 2011-07-20 at 15:28 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Orphan igraph
Since I took the python binding I guess I should take this one to :)
Pierre
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Each release, before branching, we block currently orphaned packages.
It's that time again for Fedora 16.
New this go-round is that we are also blocking packages that have
failed to build since before Fedora 14.
The following packages are currently orphaned, or fail to build. If
you have a need f
I want to take fcitx. I have pressed Take Ownership on pkgdb.
在 2011-7-15 上午3:40，"Bill Nottingham" 写道：
> Each release, before branching, we block currently orphaned packages.
> It's that time again for Fedora 16.
>
> New this go-round is that we are also blocking packages that have
> failed to buil
On Thu, 14 Jul 2011, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 12:39:13
> From: Bill Nottingham
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages in F-16 (v3)
>
> Each release, before branching, we block currently orphaned packages.
>
> Orphan irda-utils
I've taken it. Comantainers welcome.
Dmitry Butskoy
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/DmitryButskoy
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
2011/7/14 Bill Nottingham :
>
> If not claimed, the packages will be blocked on Monday, July 25.
>
> Orphan man-pages-es
I've just took that one.
k.r.
Domingo Becker
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 1:09 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Each release, before branching, we block currently orphaned packages.
> It's that time again for Fedora 16.
>
> New this go-round is that we are also blocking packages that have
> failed to build since before Fedora 14.
>
> The followi
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 03:39:13PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Orphan isic
seeing as I took ip6sic which is similar, I'll take this too.
Dave
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Each release, before branching, we block currently orphaned packages.
> It's that time again for Fedora 16.
>
> Orphan jomolhari-fonts
> Orphan kanjistrokeorders-fonts
> Orphan tibetan-machine-uni-fonts
Taken. EPEL branches for kanjistrokeorders-fonts are available.
--
P
2011/7/14 Bill Nottingham :
> Each release, before branching, we block currently orphaned packages.
> It's that time again for Fedora 16.
> Orphan me-tv
I've just took me-tv on pkgdb
Nicolas (kwizart)
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailm
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 03:39:13PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
*snip*
> Orphan userspace-rcu
I'll take that one.
--CJD
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Each release, before branching, we block currently orphaned packages.
It's that time again for Fedora 16.
New this go-round is that we are also blocking packages that have
failed to build since before Fedora 14.
The following packages are currently orphaned, or fail to build. If
you have a need f
> Orphan etherape
I take it
--
JFCh
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 09:55:30 +1000
Peter Hutterer wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 11:05:14PM +0200, Thomas Spura wrote:
> > On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 15:28:59 -0400
> > Bill Nottingham wrote:
> >
> > > Orphan gpointing-device-settings
> >
> > This is co-maintained by whot (not shown in this list).
>
2011/7/12 Bill Nottingham :
> Orphan fvwm
> comaintained by: pertusus
Took this one.
--
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 2011-07-12, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Orphan perl-Gearman
> Orphan perl-Gearman-Client-Async
> Orphan perl-Gearman-Server
> Orphan perl-MogileFS-Client
> Orphan perl-MogileFS-Utils
> Orphan perl-Perlbal-XS-HTTPHeaders
> Orphan perl-mogilefs-server
> Orphan root-tail
Fedora branches overtaken. EP
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 04:22:05PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Bruno Wolff III (br...@wolff.to) said:
> > > Orphan: gdk-pixbuf
> > > freetennis requires gdk-pixbuf-devel = 1:0.22.0-38.fc12
> >
> > I'll take this one to keep freetennis, which seems to be a fairly highly
> > rated game. gdk
On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 15:28 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Orphan python-igraph
I'll take this one, looks like something I could play with.
Pierre
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 03:28:59PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Orphan perl-Danga-Socket
> Orphan perl-Sys-Syscall
I've taken those two in Fedora; EPEL is still available.
--
# Petr Sabata
pgpBHMFr09km4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 11:05:14PM +0200, Thomas Spura wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 15:28:59 -0400
> Bill Nottingham wrote:
>
> > Orphan gpointing-device-settings
>
> This is co-maintained by whot (not shown in this list).
>
> I definitely want to keep this.
> Peter: Do you continue as primary m
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 03:28:59PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Orphan: fping
> mon requires fping = 2.4b2-11.fc15
> nagios-plugins requires /usr/sbin/fping
> nagios-plugins-fping requires /usr/sbin/fping
> smokeping requires fping = 2.4b2-11.fc15
> wifiroamd requires fping =
Adam Williamson (awill...@redhat.com) said:
> I believe the idea is that libsexy should be able to die now, as all it
> did should be possible through other libs, so probably the things that
> use it (and that aren't intermediary widgets like libsexymm and
> python-sexy and so on) need to get port
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 05:04:51PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 03:28:59PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> >
> > > Orphan ip6sic
> >
> > I've used this from time to time. I'll pick it up.
>
> So I took maintainershi
Dave Jones (da...@redhat.com) said:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 05:04:51PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 03:28:59PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> >
> > > Orphan ip6sic
> >
> > I've used this from time to time. I'll pick it up.
>
> So I took maintainership in pkgdb.
On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 16:00 -0400, Tom Callaway wrote:
> > Orphan: libsexy
> > awn-extras-applets requires libsexy-devel = 0.1.11-17.fc16
> > gmpc requires libsexy.so.2
> > gmpc requires libsexy-devel = 0.1.11-17.fc16
> > gwaei requires libsexy.so.2
> > gwaei requires libsexy-d
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 05:04:51PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 03:28:59PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>
> > Orphan ip6sic
>
> I've used this from time to time. I'll pick it up.
So I took maintainership in pkgdb. Now every time I commit,
I get a bounce email from ip
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 05:04:51PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 03:28:59PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>
> > Orphan ip6sic
>
> I've used this from time to time. I'll pick it up.
>
> > Orphan minicom
> >comaintained by: jcapik
>
> If something is orphaned, but has
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 05:12:07PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > > Orphan minicom
> > > comaintained by: jcapik
> >
> > If something is orphaned, but has comaintainers, is that enough to keep
> > it in the distro ?
>
> Not really - we'd like one of the comaintainers to pick
Dave Jones (da...@redhat.com) said:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 03:28:59PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>
> > Orphan ip6sic
>
> I've used this from time to time. I'll pick it up.
>
> > Orphan minicom
> >comaintained by: jcapik
>
> If something is orphaned, but has comaintainers, is that
On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 15:28:59 -0400
Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Orphan: spambayes
> kdepim requires spambayes = 1.1-0.3.a6.fc15
> trac-spamfilter-plugin requires spambayes = 1.1-0.3.a6.fc15
I've taken spambayes as I need it for trac-spamfilter-plugin. I would
really appreciate a co-maintainer
On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 15:28:59 -0400
Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Orphan gpointing-device-settings
This is co-maintained by whot (not shown in this list).
I definitely want to keep this.
Peter: Do you continue as primary maintainer and I'll co-maintain it, or
do you want to stay co-maintainer?
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 03:28:59PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Orphan ip6sic
I've used this from time to time. I'll pick it up.
> Orphan minicom
> comaintained by: jcapik
If something is orphaned, but has comaintainers, is that enough to keep
it in the distro ?
Dave
--
de
On 07/12/2011 11:30 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Bruno Wolff III (br...@wolff.to) said:
I'll take this one to keep freetennis, which seems to be a fairly highly
rated game. gdk-pixbuf is FTBFS, but I think I can get it building before
alpha.
>>>
>>> This looks like a rather bogus de
Bill Nottingham (nott...@redhat.com) said:
> > Thanks. For the time being I'll still take it. I'll also ask for access
> > to freetennis so I can do a freetennis build that doesn't require it.
> > If I can fix the FTBFS I am willing to hang on to it for a while, though
> > people interested in pro
Bruno Wolff III (br...@wolff.to) said:
> > > I'll take this one to keep freetennis, which seems to be a fairly highly
> > > rated game. gdk-pixbuf is FTBFS, but I think I can get it building before
> > > alpha.
> >
> > This looks like a rather bogus dep, IMO - gdk-pixbuf is for GTK1 apps,
> > and
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 16:22:05 -0400,
Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Bruno Wolff III (br...@wolff.to) said:
> > > Orphan: gdk-pixbuf
> > > freetennis requires gdk-pixbuf-devel = 1:0.22.0-38.fc12
> >
> > I'll take this one to keep freetennis, which seems to be a fairly highly
> > rated game. gd
Bill Nottingham (nott...@redhat.com) said:
> Each release, before branching, we block currently orphaned packages.
> It's that time again for Fedora 16.
>
> New this go-round is that we are also blocking packages that have
> failed to build since before Fedora 14.
>
> The following packages are
Bruno Wolff III (br...@wolff.to) said:
> > Orphan: gdk-pixbuf
> > freetennis requires gdk-pixbuf-devel = 1:0.22.0-38.fc12
>
> I'll take this one to keep freetennis, which seems to be a fairly highly
> rated game. gdk-pixbuf is FTBFS, but I think I can get it building before
> alpha.
This loo
Am Dienstag, den 12.07.2011, 15:28 -0400 schrieb Bill Nottingham:
> Orphan link-grammar
I am taking this one. As parsing stuff is always a fancy thing :)
- fabian
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Orphan telepathy-haze
I'll grab this since I already maintain most of telepathy stack.
Later,
/B
--
Brian Pepple
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Bpepple
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E
BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B CBDE
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 15:28:59 -0400,
Bill Nottingham wrote:
>
> Orphan pychess
> comaintained by: salimma
I'll take this one. It's a nice enough chess program that I want to keep it.
> Orphan: gdk-pixbuf
> freetennis requires gdk-pixbuf-devel = 1:0.22.0-38.fc12
I'll take this o
On 07/12/2011 03:28 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Orphan: ecore
> xmms2 requires ecore-devel = 1.0.0-2.fc15
> xmms2 requires libecore.so.1
> xmms2-ruby requires libecore.so.1
> Orphan: libsexy
> awn-extras-applets requires libsexy-devel = 0.1.11-17.fc16
> gmpc requires libsexy.s
Each release, before branching, we block currently orphaned packages.
It's that time again for Fedora 16.
New this go-round is that we are also blocking packages that have
failed to build since before Fedora 14.
The following packages are currently orphaned, or fail to build. If
you have a need f
76 matches
Mail list logo
