Hello
2014-07-21 10:59 GMT+02:00 Christopher Meng :
> I just want to ask here, why did you retire the pywcs and considered
> it as dead upstream whereas pypi pywcs has a new release in the
> February?
>
The functionallity of pywcs is now in astropy, is where active development
is happening. The
I just want to ask here, why did you retire the pywcs and considered
it as dead upstream whereas pypi pywcs has a new release in the
February?
And now APLpy is broken.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct
On Wed, 2 Jul 2014, Peter Hanecak wrote:
I would like to take over tinyca2.
I do not see anywhere on the list why the maintainers left it. So I'll
check the procedures and also other sources and take it.
According to Koji[1], some F21 build was successful last month so
hopefully there wont be
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 12:38:10AM +0200, Sergio Pascual wrote:
> I thought I had retired correctly pywcs, but is not in the list. Did I miss
> some step?
The list contains only packages I am going to retire unless they are
taken care of. So if you retired a package, it is expected that the
packag
Hello,
I would like to take over tinyca2.
I do not see anywhere on the list why the maintainers left it. So I'll
check the procedures and also other sources and take it.
According to Koji[1], some F21 build was successful last month so
hopefully there wont be many difficulties.
Sincerely
Peter
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Christopher Meng wrote:
> I'd like to claim the ownership of blktap and alliance.
Is there any point in blktap? I thought, and I might be wrong here,
that it's functionality had been folded back into xen.
Peter
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.or
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 12:47:57AM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 12:24 AM, Till Maas wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 06:28:58PM -0500, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> >
> >> >alliance chitlesh, tnorth
> >>
> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?i
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 12:24 AM, Till Maas wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 06:28:58PM -0500, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
>
>> >alliance chitlesh, tnorth
>>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1105945
>
> I applied your patch but then noticed that the version is also t
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 06:28:58PM -0500, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> >alliance chitlesh, tnorth
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1105945
I applied your patch but then noticed that the version is also three
years behind upstream, therefore I am not convinced it
On 2014-06-24 15:12, Till Maas wrote:
The following packages are orphaned or did not build for two
releases and will be retired when Fedora (F21) is branched, unless someone
adopts them.
More patches:
alliance chitlesh, tnorth
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?i
I'd like to claim the ownership of blktap and alliance.
What should I do next? DIrectly request the ACL via bugzilla?
Thanks.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduc
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 10:31:18AM +0700, Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich wrote:
> > > Package(co)maintainers
> > >
> > >
> > > ===
> > > NearTree tmatsuu
> > >
> > > The f
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 2:12 PM, Till Maas wrote:
> cbmc orphan, shakthimaan
I have taken this package.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Con
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 10:31:18AM +0700, Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich wrote:
> > Package(co)maintainers
> > ===
> > NearTree tmatsuu
> >
> > The following packages require
> Package(co)maintainers
> ===
> NearTree tmatsuu
>
> The following packages require above mentioned packages:
> Depending on: NearTree
> rasmol (maintained by:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 10:12:11PM +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> Depending on: jbosscache-support
> hibernate3 (maintained by: gil, jhernand, msrb)
> hibernate3-3.6.10-14.fc21.src requires jbosscache-common-parent
> = 1.6-8.fc21
> hibernate3-jbosscache-3.6.10-14.fc21
On 2014-06-24 15:12, Till Maas wrote:
The following packages are orphaned or did not build for two
releases and will be retired when Fedora (F21) is branched, unless someone
adopts them.
I have posted patches for a few of these (some before I realized they
were orphaned), should anyone want th
The following packages are orphaned or did not build for two
releases and will be retired when Fedora (F21) is branched, unless someone
adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do
so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package
18 matches
Mail list logo
