On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 11:16 PM, Till Maas wrote:
> modplugtools needs to be changed to not ship modplugplay anymore, but
> modplug123 should still work.
Done in F-20+.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Cond
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 9:16 PM, Till Maas wrote:
> The following packages have been retired:
>
> alsa-oss
> firmware-extract
> firstboot
> gkrellm-timestamp
> guiloader
> justmoon
> lybniz
> mars-sim
> miau
> openstack-tempo
> osgal
> python3-cherrypy
> vblade
>
> Because alsa-oss was retired, m
The following packages have been retired:
alsa-oss
firmware-extract
firstboot
gkrellm-timestamp
guiloader
justmoon
lybniz
mars-sim
miau
openstack-tempo
osgal
python3-cherrypy
vblade
Because alsa-oss was retired, mumble needs to be rebuild without OSS
support (just removing the BR failed in a scra
2013/8/16 Bill Nottingham
>
> > $ koji list-tagged --latest f20 | grep fc1[4-8]
>
> Actually, now that I re-read what we did before, for F-20 we'd block things
> that have failed to build since *before* F-18, i.e., those with fc17 or
> earlier dist tags.
>
> Which shortens the list to:
> ...
This
On 17 August 2013 10:00, Till Maas wrote:
> Due to missing FTBFS bug reports for Fedora 18 and a bug in scripting,
> FTBFS packages were missing in previous reports. According to
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fails_to_build_from_source?rd=FTBFS#Package_Removal_for_Long-standing_FTBFS_bugs
>
在 2013-8-17 PM5:00，"Till Maas" 写道：
> becicku, mcepl
Please don't retire it, I'm planning an update these days.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-o
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:26:45PM +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
> On 08/16/2013 10:15 PM, Till Maas wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 03:17:42PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> >
> >> FTBFS packages need:
> >>
> >> 1) a list gathered by pruning the old F18FTBFS bug, or noting what things
> >> still
(Sorry, I forgot to add the package maintainers address to Bcc,
therefore this message will appear twice on the devel mailing list)
Due to missing FTBFS bug reports for Fedora 18 and a bug in scripting,
FTBFS packages were missing in previous reports. According to
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fai
Due to missing FTBFS bug reports for Fedora 18 and a bug in scripting,
FTBFS packages were missing in previous reports. According to
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fails_to_build_from_source?rd=FTBFS#Package_Removal_for_Long-standing_FTBFS_bugs
removing long standing FTBFS packages might be delayed
On 08/16/2013 03:01 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
your better off using koji to query the builds tagged as it gives you
the source package named.
$ koji list-tagged --latest f20 | grep fc1[4-8]
torque-3.0.4-1.fc17 f20 stevetraylen
I've given torque a litt
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:20 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said:
>> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 9:26 PM, Kalev Lember wrote:
>> > On 08/16/2013 10:15 PM, Till Maas wrote:
>> >> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 03:17:42PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> FTBFS pa
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:20 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Bill Nottingham (nott...@redhat.com) said:
>> > libvpd-2.1.1-2.fc15 f20 ausil
>> > lsvpd-1.6.8-3.fc15f20 ausil
>
> ... and note that these two are PPC only,
Bill Nottingham (nott...@redhat.com) said:
> > libvpd-2.1.1-2.fc15 f20 ausil
> > lsvpd-1.6.8-3.fc15f20 ausil
... and note that these two are PPC only, IIRC.
Bill
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said:
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 9:26 PM, Kalev Lember wrote:
> > On 08/16/2013 10:15 PM, Till Maas wrote:
> >> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 03:17:42PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> >>
> >>> FTBFS packages need:
> >>>
> >>> 1) a list gathered by pruning the old F
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 9:26 PM, Kalev Lember wrote:
> On 08/16/2013 10:15 PM, Till Maas wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 03:17:42PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>>
>>> FTBFS packages need:
>>>
>>> 1) a list gathered by pruning the old F18FTBFS bug, or noting what things
>>> still have earlier d
On 08/16/2013 10:15 PM, Till Maas wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 03:17:42PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>
>> FTBFS packages need:
>>
>> 1) a list gathered by pruning the old F18FTBFS bug, or noting what things
>> still have earlier dist tags
>
[snip]
> Nevertheless, as far as I can see there
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 03:17:42PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> FTBFS packages need:
>
> 1) a list gathered by pruning the old F18FTBFS bug, or noting what things
> still have earlier dist tags
There is no such bug, therefore I checked whether any package from
http://fedorapeople.org/~ausil/f
Kalev Lember (kalevlem...@gmail.com) said:
> On 08/10/2013 08:50 PM, Till Maas wrote:
> > The following packages are orphaned or did not build for two
> > releases [...]
>
> From what I can tell, the list below was only for orphaned packages. Are
> there plans to retire FTBFS packages as well?
>
Kalev Lember (kalevlem...@gmail.com) said:
> On 08/10/2013 08:50 PM, Till Maas wrote:
> > The following packages are orphaned or did not build for two
> > releases [...]
>
> From what I can tell, the list below was only for orphaned packages. Are
> there plans to retire FTBFS packages as well?
(
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 19:37:29 +0800,
Christopher Meng wrote:
在 2013-8-16 PM7:25，"Kalev Lember" 写道：
From what I can tell, the list below was only for orphaned packages. Are
there plans to retire FTBFS packages as well?
Why?
Still many FTBFS on my hand, most are related to docdir change.
在 2013-8-16 PM7:25，"Kalev Lember" 写道：
> From what I can tell, the list below was only for orphaned packages. Are
> there plans to retire FTBFS packages as well?
Why?
Still many FTBFS on my hand, most are related to docdir change.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin
On 08/10/2013 08:50 PM, Till Maas wrote:
> The following packages are orphaned or did not build for two
> releases [...]
From what I can tell, the list below was only for orphaned packages. Are
there plans to retire FTBFS packages as well?
--
Thanks,
Kalev
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedo
Here is a status update, many orphans were adopted, but some new
appeared:
Package(co)maintainers
bluecoveorphan
cal3d orphan
dayplanner orphan, rakesh
derelictorphan, bi
On 10 August 2013 19:50, Till Maas wrote:
>
> Package(co)maintainers
> ===
> cpptasks orphan
Taken.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
PyOpenGL taken.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 20:50:26 +0200,
Till Maas wrote:
The following packages are orphaned or did not build for two
releases and will be retired when Fedora (F20) is branched, unless someone
adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do
so now with a proper
The following packages are orphaned or did not build for two
releases and will be retired when Fedora (F20) is branched, unless someone
adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do
so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package
27 matches
Mail list logo
