On 17 August 2013 10:00, Till Maas <opensou...@till.name> wrote: > Due to missing FTBFS bug reports for Fedora 18 and a bug in scripting, > FTBFS packages were missing in previous reports. According to > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fails_to_build_from_source?rd=FTBFS#Package_Removal_for_Long-standing_FTBFS_bugs > removing long standing FTBFS packages might be delayed until the Alpha > release, which is planned for in about a month. Nevertheless, please fix > packages ASAP. > > The following packages are orphaned or did not build for two > releases and will be retired when Fedora (F20) is branched, unless someone > adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, > please do > so now with a proper reason: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life > > According to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Schedule branching will > occur not earlier than 2013-08-20. The packages will be retired shortly > before. > > Note: If you received this mail directly you (co)maintain one of the > affected > packages or a package that depends on one. > > Package (co)maintainers > =========================================================================== > eclipse-phpeclipse mbooth, swagiaal > eclipse-veditor chitlesh, shakthimaan, swagiaal
I've fixed eclipse-veditor in F19 and F20. I'm thinking of retiring eclipse-phpeclipse anyway -- upstream is generally unresponsive and the project often seems moribund so I suspect Eclipse PDT is *much* better than PHPEclipse these days.... If anyone is still using eclipse-phpeclipse, I urge you to try out http://projects.eclipse.org/projects/tools.pdt
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
