May be just update it to new version?
пт, 22 нояб. 2024 г. в 15:30, Richard Fearn :
>
> Hi all,
>
> ncdu is a text-mode disk usage analyzer: https://dev.yorhel.nl/ncdu
>
> I maintain the ncdu package in Fedora
> (https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ncdu) which is currently ncdu 1.x
> (written in
I will take it.
чт, 3 авг. 2023 г., 19:24 Zdeněk Žamberský :
> Hello,
>
> review request (jedit):
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2228918
>
> reviewers welcome :)
> thanks
>
> --
> Zdeněk Žamberský
> OpenJDK QE
> Red Hat
> ___
> devel mail
Is there a chance to have Octave 8.1 at F38?
вс, 9 апр. 2023 г. в 18:49, Orion Poplawski :
>
> On 4/8/23 17:27, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > On 4/5/23 20:22, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> >> I will be updating octave to 8.1 this weekend. This involves a soname
> >> bump and I will be rebuilding all deps
Thanks.
About %autosetup - my mistake too.
Thread closed.
ср, 1 мар. 2023 г. в 13:48, Sérgio Basto :
>
> On Wed, 2023-03-01 at 12:22 +0300, Vascom wrote:
> > Hi all.
> >
> > As I noticed Fedora change default behaviour at %prep section of
> > spec-file.
&
Hi all.
As I noticed Fedora change default behaviour at %prep section of spec-file.
Now by default executed %{set_build_flags} and added "-p1" parameter
to %autosetup for applying patches.
Is it really?
Are there other changes?
When will these changes be included in the Packaging Guidelines?
___
I'm afraid to make a mistake in the procedure.
пн, 20 февр. 2023 г. в 13:34, Sandro :
>
> On 20-02-2023 10:09, Vascom wrote:
> > This package can be retired. There is no need for anyone to take it.
>
> Why not retire it directly, if adoption makes no sense?
>
> http
I have orphaned pulseeffects package because it replaced by
easyeffects at upstream and at Fedora.
This package can be retired. There is no need for anyone to take it.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email t
Seems as bad practice to drop packages by upstream request.
ср, 25 янв. 2023 г. в 14:38, Pete Walter :
>
> I am not happy about dropping Fedora packages in favor of upstream Flatpaks
> either.
>
> Can you assign the package to me instead of retiring it? I can get it updated
> so we can keep it i
Need help with rebuilding doublecmd.
вт, 24 янв. 2023 г. в 16:21, Richard Shaw :
>
> hobbes1069 (9):
> cqrlog - Fails for some weird lazbuild issue I don't understand
> flnet - Spec conditional oops. Fixed.
> flrig - Needed cstdint. Fixed
> freecad - Needs cstdint. Working on it.
> gmsh - Needed c
I have some packages failed.
One of them libtins. Problem is that:
error: 'uint32_t' is not a member of 'std';
Is it normal? Is it GCC 13 change?
I must patch sources now?
sed -i 's|stdint.h|cstdint|' include/tins/ip_address.h
вт, 24 янв. 2023 г. в 05:52, Kevin Fenzi :
>
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2023
I will take it.
чт, 29 дек. 2022 г. в 16:08, Antonio T. sagitter :
>
> Hi all.
>
> qwtplot3d-qt6 is a new package and needs a review:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2156091
>
> I will glad to review another package in return of your courteousness.
>
>
> Best regards
>
> --
> ---
>
You can became maintainer and add this to rpmfusion.
пт, 1 июл. 2022 г., 10:50 Christopher Klooz :
> Sorry, I didn't mean to implement this specific solution. That was only
> meant as example that the issue is known. I meant it more generic, any
> solution for the user that can be included in the
May be.
But anyone know about this problem?
сб, 2 апр. 2022 г. в 15:44, Mattia Verga via devel
:
>
> Il 02/04/22 14:24, Vascom ha scritto:
> > Hi.
> >
> > How to push this stucked binutils update to rawhide?
> > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-0d
Hi.
How to push this stucked binutils update to rawhide?
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-0d344a9601
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Cod
What about KDE spin crashes because of non stable sddm?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2066304
This made F36 KDE fully unfunctional.
пт, 1 апр. 2022 г., 19:40 Ben Cotton :
> F36 Final freeze begins Tuesday 5 April. We are currently targeting
> the early target date (2022-04-19), whi
bibutils now released a 7.1 version with soname updated from 6 to 7.
I will rebuild it for rawhide in a week.
Because no one package not depend on libbibutils I will update it for F35 too.
No one other package no need to rebuild.
--
best regards,
Vasiliy Glazov
___
) and have commit
access.
пн, 9 авг. 2021 г. в 11:30, Anatoly Vildemanov via devel
:
>
> Is this instruction for stay sponsor?
> I want to join to packager like member , is it possible?
>
> Thanks
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Vascom
> Sent: Monday, Augu
Hi.
If you want be co-maintainer you should follow this instruction
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group#Become_a_co-maintainer
пн, 9 авг. 2021 г. в 10:33, Anatoly Vildemanov via devel
:
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> My name is Anatoly (anatolyv) . I work in UCX project ,
Also you should inform upstream to remove exec flag from this files in
their repo/sources.
вс, 8 авг. 2021 г., 15:06 :
> I will remove the executable flag with:
> chmod 0644 *.pm
>
> Thanks a lot
> Martin
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedora
But in /usr/share should not be executables, as I know.
вс, 8 авг. 2021 г., 14:43 Vitaly Zaitsev via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org>:
> On 08/08/2021 13:01, linux4mar...@gmx.de wrote:
> > How can i solve this ?
>
> Set chmod 0644 or add a shebang by patching them.
>
> --
> Sincerely,
>
Your package require systemd?
Systemd own this directory?
If yes it is OK
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_the_directory_is_also_owned_by_a_package_implementing_required_functionality_of_your_package
If you mean warning from fedora-review then it tool may be old. But
re
You can use command
spectool -g name.spec
to download sources.
вт, 6 июл. 2021 г., 19:15 Richard W.M. Jones :
>
> Is this possible? I've got one with lots of %{macros} in it.
>
> It seems like this should be possible using rpmspec, but I can't work
> out how.
>
> Rich.
>
> --
> Richard Jones, Vi
Seems that you need add BR: gambas3-gb-desktop-x11
пт, 21 мая 2021 г., 09:20 Martin Gansser :
> Hi,
>
> when compiling xt7-player-mpv-0.33.3152 [1] on fedora fc34 & rawhide, i
> get this error message:
>
> + cd /home/martin/rpmbuild/BUILD
> + cd xt7-player-mpv-0.33.3152
> + /usr/bin/gbc3 -e -a -g
Also look at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers
сб, 10 апр. 2021 г., 14:22 Peter Oliver :
> Welcome! Start at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproj
Done.
вт, 23 мар. 2021 г. в 17:32, chedi toueiti :
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a trivial python package (re-assert) to review:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1941362
>
> needed for pre-commit tests.
>
> Happy to review in exchange.
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Chedi Toueiti
>
> * Due to the const
is killed. And the logs are empty.
вс, 21 мар. 2021 г. в 21:21, Alexey A. :
>
> The bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1941340
>
> пн, 22 мар. 2021 г. в 03:12, Vascom :
> >
> > Hi all.
> >
> > I want to draw your attention to the bug in systemd-oomd
. :
>
> What is in the journal?
>
> пн, 22 мар. 2021 г. в 03:12, Vascom :
> >
> > Hi all.
> >
> > I want to draw your attention to the bug in systemd-oomd in F34.
> > This oomd kills my work application during the second run of the stress
> &g
Hi all.
I want to draw your attention to the bug in systemd-oomd in F34.
This oomd kills my work application during the second run of the stress test.
And I create this ticket:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1941340
Can anybody confirm that behaviour?
Also I don't see any logs about
Please, keep simple "Fedora".
Don't make us ridiculous.
I vote -1.
ср, 10 мар. 2021 г., 22:22 Reon Beon via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org>:
> uname -a
>
> Linux fedora 5.12.0-0.rc2.165.fc35.x86_64 #1 SMP Sat Mar 6 16:32:15 UTC
> 2021 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>
> Shouldn't fedora b
What's wrong with s390x koji builder?
I always see this error:
Child return code was: -11
EXCEPTION: [Error()]
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/mockbuild/trace_decorator.py",
line 93, in trace
result = func(*args, **kw)
File "/usr/lib/python3.9/sit
Hi all.
I want to update cryptopp package to 8.3.0.
It has the same soname version but changes in ABI.
I found only two dependent packages:
clementine
tegrarcm
So I will rebuild them too.
If you have any suggestions or I missed some dependent packages please tell me.
I am plan to make builds at
Many of this are cmake change breakage.
пн, 3 авг. 2020 г., 18:15 Richard Hughes :
> On Mon, 3 Aug 2020 at 14:02, Mohan Boddu wrote:
> > Failures can be seen
> > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f33-failures.html
>
> Most of those are the libcroco->gettext breakage, no? We're not
Disable LTO
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/redhat-rpm-config/c/5baaf4a99cc77572d3496a7000674098bef7ed68?branch=master
ср, 29 июл. 2020 г., 17:08 :
> Hello opencv [1] build also failed around LTO
> What is your advise ? What is your advice?
>
> Thanks,
>
> [1]
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/
I see you successfully added comaintainer :)
чт, 9 июл. 2020 г., 10:14 Vascom :
> Try again.
> You can see that packager group present
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/user/view/yshestakov
>
> чт, 9 июл. 2020 г. в 10:09, Andrey Maslennikov >:
> >
> > Hm,
Try again.
You can see that packager group present
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/user/view/yshestakov
чт, 9 июл. 2020 г. в 10:09, Andrey Maslennikov :
>
> Hm, looks like something is still wrong, I'm getting "This user must be in
> one of the following groups to be allowed to be added
Done.
Now you can add yshestakov as comaintainer.
чт, 9 июл. 2020 г. в 09:47, Andrey Maslennikov :
>
> Yes, I trust him completely on this matter.
>
> @Vascom thank you for your help! Should I open a ticket for it?
> ___
> devel mai
Are you sure that he will be a good maintainer?
If you want to follow this
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group#Become_a_co-maintainer
I can be a sponsor.
чт, 9 июл. 2020 г. в 09:01, Andrey Maslennikov :
>
> Hello!
>
> I'm trying to add a co-maintainer to my
I took it.
вт, 30 июн. 2020 г. в 06:28, Chenxiong Qi :
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> Could anyone please review these three packages?
>
> python-django-uuslug
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1851463
>
> python-django-contrib-comments
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1851562
>
If this change will be accepted I think need to modify anaconda
partition dialog for BTRFS scheme.
It has difficult and not obvious behavior when user want to change
automatically created partition scheme and resize BTRFS volumes.
See this bugreport https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=18512
I think it is good step to user friendly Fedora experience.
+1
пт, 26 июн. 2020 г., 14:45 Charalampos Stratakis :
> +1
>
> I'm all for making the user experience better, and I think this change
> contributes to that.
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Ben Cotton"
> > To: devel-annou...
Mail original -
> De: "Vascom"
> À: "Development discussions related to Fedora" <
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> Envoyé: Dimanche 31 Mai 2020 12:13:58
> Objet: Re: Packaging problem
>
>
>
> I think Qt will not be upgraded in F31.
>
>
&g
s problem is
> already fixed on Fedora 32.
>
> Does a Qt5 update is programmed for Fedora 31 ?
>
> - Mail original -
> De: "Vascom"
> À: "Development discussions related to Fedora" <
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> Envoyé: Dimanche 31 Mai 2020
not with %_qt5_qmake ...
>
> Thanks a lot
>
> I see that qmake_qt5 macro call _qt5_qmake with some flags ...
> I found the macro via rpm --showrc | grep qmake and I choose the wrong
> result.
>
>
> - Mail original -
> De: "Vascom"
> À: "Development d
Also
Macro forms of system executables SHOULD NOT be used except when there
is a need to allow the location of those executables to be
configurable. For example, rm should be used in preference to %{__rm},
but %{__python3} is acceptable.
сб, 30 мая 2020 г. в 22:51, :
>
> Yes, you're right :)
>
> H
First you should use this macro %{qmake_qt5} and remove %{set_build_flags}.
And show your spec or give srpm.
сб, 30 мая 2020 г. в 22:21, :
>
> Hello,
>
> I've got a problem with a package.
> I am trying to clean up a spec file before sending it to review and I've got
> an error:
>
> erreur : Emp
OK
I just write it because you request report about "I don't see changes in
changelog".
чт, 28 мая 2020 г., 15:16 Jonathan Wakely :
> On 28/05/20 14:47 +0300, Vascom wrote:
> >Hi.
> >
> >pulseeffects package depends on boost and I don't see change
Hi.
pulseeffects package depends on boost and I don't see changes in changelog.
чт, 28 мая 2020 г., 11:45 Jonathan Wakely :
> I'm starting the rebuilds for Boost 1.73.0 and packages that depend on
> it, using the f33-boost side tag.
>
> If you see "Rebuilt for Boost 1.73.0" in the changelog for
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers#Create_Your_Review_Request
ср, 27 мая 2020 г., 20:53 Yann Collette :
>
> Le 27/05/2020 à 17:39, Peter Lemenkov a écrit :
> > Hello Yann!
> >
> > ср, 27 мая 2020 г. в 15:05, :
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I just registered the Fedora
Hi all.
Some packages has string
...
And appstream-util validate-relax show error
? tag-invalid : stock icon is not valid
There exist bugreport one year old!
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1584944
Please pay attention to it.
No I don't know what to do:
1. Remove this str
kchildlock orphaned.
It is for KDE4 and has dead upstream.
--
Best regards,
Vasiliy Glazov
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.f
Are you use SSD?
I have 0.087s on it.
сб, 16 мая 2020 г., 13:57 Dominique Martinet :
> Hi,
>
> once in a while I get annoyed at how slow bash is to startup; using a
> tiling wm poping a new shell is supposed to be quite fast but I'm
> staring at a new empty window for ~1s everytime and it gets a
Yes, after system installed on hard drive the same error.
But after upgrading boost* error is gone and packages normal installed.
пт, 15 мая 2020 г. в 00:33, Vascom :
>
> I just could reproduce it.
>
> Steps:
> 1. Run KDE spin F32 in virt-manager.
> 2. dnf install
I just could reproduce it.
Steps:
1. Run KDE spin F32 in virt-manager.
2. dnf install toolnix
Result:
mkvtoolnix x86_64 46.0.0-1.fc32 updates 5.2 M
Installing dependencies:
boost169-filesystem x86_64 1.69.0-6.fc32 fedora53 k
boost169-syste
Hm, now work.
But it was...
чт, 14 мая 2020 г. в 23:56, Samuel Sieb :
>
> On 5/14/20 1:34 PM, Denis Arnaud wrote:
> > So, should I add the obsoletes clauses for every package, or is it fine to
> > leave it as it is now?
>
> I believe it's fine to just leave it as it is. I did a couple of
> insta
No one try to install it now. New boost will be in F33 only.
But if boost not installed in system and user want install for example
libreoffice he will get this error and can't install any package
requires boost.
boost169 must be removed from F32 repos at all.
чт, 14 мая 2020 г. в 22:19, Samuel
Now we must use qt5-qtbase-devel.
пн, 11 мая 2020 г., 12:01 Susi Lehtola :
> Hi,
>
>
> I just noticed that qt5-devel has been dropped. Is the idea to force
> all other packages to change
>
> Requires: qt5-devel
>
> into
>
> Requires: qt5-qtbase
> Requires: qt5-qtbase-gui
> Requires: qt5-qtbase-my
I will do it.
пн, 4 мая 2020 г., 11:03 Bob Hepple :
> Hello,
>
> Although I'm new here, I've had a few packages go through review
> already and I'm very grateful for the help and education provided by
> the reviewers.
>
> But there is one package that I put up for review about a month ago
> and I
Thank you.
пт, 24 апр. 2020 г., 14:40 Jonathan Wakely :
> On 20/04/20 15:43 +0300, Vascom wrote:
> >Will Boost ever be updated on Fedora again?
> >
> >https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1558278
>
> Yes.
> ___
I already built it.
But you can update to 6.0.5 :)
ср, 22 апр. 2020 г. в 22:04, Xavier Lamien :
>
> Oh hi,
>
> Looks like your email get lost in the pile if you tried to reach me
> personally or my bugzilla's filter is too efficient I'd say.
>
> Any way, I'll have a look at your ticket asap.
> A
Will Boost ever be updated on Fedora again?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1558278
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://d
I would like to take arduino.
I can make buildable again 1.8.5 version and may be update it to latest.
My FAS name: vascom -- Best regards, Vasiliy Glazov
вс, 29 мар. 2020 г. в 14:15, Miro Hrončok :
>
> According to the Fedora's Fails To Build From Source policy
I would like to take arduino.
I can make buildable again 1.8.5 version and may be update it to latest.
My FAS name: vascom
--
Best regards,
Vasiliy Glazov
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le
So this spec not follow Fedora's packaging guidlines and need to be fixed
according them.
вт, 31 мар. 2020 г., 15:57 Richard Shaw :
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 7:34 AM Vascom wrote:
>
>> Why you not use macro %qmake_qt5?
>> It contain all flags.
>>
>
> Good que
Why you not use macro %qmake_qt5?
It contain all flags.
вт, 31 мар. 2020 г., 15:25 Richard Shaw :
> Has something changed with Qt 5.14? I'm trying to update klog to new
> version but debuginfo is not being generated.
>
> Looking at the build log it's definitely missing "-g" during building but
>
Thanks.
чт, 26 мар. 2020 г., 15:50 Peter Robinson :
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 6:28 AM Vascom wrote:
> >
> > Why libusbx still not updated to 1.0.23?
> > Version 1.0.22 was released two years ago.
>
> Maybe it slipped through the cracks, maybe there wasn't anythi
BZ ticket already submitted and I wrote there.
I will try email to maintainers directly now.
чт, 26 мар. 2020 г., 15:22 Richard Shaw :
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 1:28 AM Vascom wrote:
>
>> Why libusbx still not updated to 1.0.23?
>> Version 1.0.22 was released two years ag
Why libusbx still not updated to 1.0.23?
Version 1.0.22 was released two years ago.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedorapro
Updated to 6.10.
Can I update it in F32 now?
пн, 23 мар. 2020 г. в 21:56, Vascom :
>
> I go to update bibutils in rawhide. It update lib to version 6.9.
>
> Nothing require it as BR and only kbibtex as Requires.
> So I will not rebui
I go to update bibutils in rawhide. It update lib to version 6.9.
Nothing require it as BR and only kbibtex as Requires.
So I will not rebuild any packages.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le.
You can add me as comaintainer.
FAS name: vascom
вс, 8 мар. 2020 г., 19:32 Dusty Mabe :
> The current maintainer of fuse-sshfs is looking for a co-maintainer for it
> in epel8. It's currently not in EPEL 8 so if you go from RHEL or CentOS
> 7->8
> you'll lose it. I ha
Please help me understand why I am marked?
vascom: perl-Compress-LZF
I can't find any package requires perl-Compress-LZF. This always empty:
dnf repoquery --whatrequires perl-Compress-LZF --alldeps
dnf repoquery --whatrequires "perl(Compress::LZF)" --alldeps
вт, 18 февр. 2020 г.
No way.
You can add comaintainer for EPEL builds of your packages.
чт, 30 янв. 2020 г. в 12:13, Michael Schwendt :
>
> I don't do EPEL packaging. I never signed up as an "owner" of EPEL packages.
> I don't want to be the new default owner of EPEL bugzilla tickets.
> Where may I be able to stop thi
Are s390x builders ready for Mass Rebuild?
I see many fail builds only on s390x without logs.
вт, 28 янв. 2020 г. в 11:39, Mohan Boddu :
>
> We are starting the mass rebuild now.
>
> Thanks.
>
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 5:38 PM Jeff Law wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 2020-01-27 at 21:23 +0100, Fabio Valen
Welcome new Fedora's packager - girst.
He is already rpmfusion packager and I am sure will be good in Fedora.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Condu
I can review it without swap.
пт, 6 дек. 2019 г. в 03:03, Jerry James :
>
> One of my upstreams picked up a new documentation dependency. Who would like
> to swap reviews? This one should be quick and easy.
>
> python-sphinx-copybutton: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1780426
>
> Th
pgrosu - is your FAS name?
Are you in packager group?
ср, 20 нояб. 2019 г. в 10:20, Paul Grosu :
>
> Hi Vascom,
>
> Thank you for the quick reply. I already added the SSH public key, but when
> I try to ssh with my private key and enter the username pgrosu at the
> (l
You need to add your public ssh key at FAS page
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts
And login via ssh.
Read all information on
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Machine_Resources_For_Package_Maintainers
ср, 20 нояб. 2019 г. в 09:54, Paul Grosu :
>
> Hello Fedora Development Community,
>
>
rg/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_source_file_verification
>
> On Nov 10, 2019 10:05, Vascom wrote:
>
> May be you need use sha256sum instead gpg?
>
> вс, 10 нояб. 2019 г., 9:17 Baxi :
>
> Hi. I am trying to package a program. The upstream provided sha256sum.asc
> file. Veri
May be you need use sha256sum instead gpg?
вс, 10 нояб. 2019 г., 9:17 Baxi :
> Hi. I am trying to package a program. The upstream provided sha256sum.asc
> file. Verifying tarball with that signature says, Can't check signature: No
> public key. I found his public key in key directory by searching
Bibutils 6.8 change soversion to 6.8.
I am update it for rawhide, F31, F30.
As I see no one package not require it so I will no rebuild anything else.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@li
klavaro fixed in rawhide.
ср, 30 окт. 2019 г. в 08:53, Luya Tshimbalanga :
>
> On 2019-10-29 8:24 a.m., Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >
> > luya
> > scribus-generator
> > (→ scribus → PY2)
> >
> Already switched to python3 :
>
> https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/scribus-generator/sources/spec/
ABI changed in svt-vp9 0.1.1 release.
All changes
https://taskotron.fedoraproject.org/artifacts/all/6720382c-ebf1-11e9-904f-52540077ca13/tests.yml/svt-vp9-0.1.1-1.fc32.log
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an ema
python3-sphinx not removed.
Look at
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=6297
чт, 19 сент. 2019 г. в 16:03, Marek Tamaskovic :
>
> Hi,
> I'm maintainer of libcbor package and in fedora 30 has been removed
> python3-sphinx package which is required to build documentation for l
Can you also unretire and build lv2-mdala-plugins?
It is needed for pulseeffects but lv2-mdala-plugins use python2 in
build script and I do not have knowledge how to rewrite it to python3.
I can only add python2 to BR and correct shebang but it seems wrong
because python2 will be erased soon.
--
fedpkg request-branch --repo fctxpd epel7
вт, 17 сент. 2019 г. в 09:26, Muneendra Kumar M via devel
:
>
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> I want to have the fctxpd fedora package into the EPEL.
>
> Iam the maintainer of this fctxpd package in fedora.
>
> Can anyone help me how can I have the same package in EPEL
It is not dependency for pulseeffects.
пн, 9 сент. 2019 г. в 20:10, Guido Aulisi :
>
> I'd like to unretire ladspa-swh-plugins in rahwide, f31 and f30,
> because it is a dependency of some packages I maintain:
>
> ams
> jamin
>
> It's a dependency of pulseeffects too.
>
> I will file a review requ
Please approve review of linuxconsoletools package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1740634
It was retired due to FTBFS but needed for gpm, fpc, lazarus to build
pascal programs.
Situation same as with gettext.
--
Best regards,
Vasiliy Glazov
___
I can review it without swap.
вт, 28 мая 2019 г. в 13:55, Lumir Balhar :
>
> Hello.
>
> I'd like to claim ownership of retired package zeal, which is currently
> in weird state not available in F30.
>
> Original bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1701666
> Review request: https://bug
No. It must be removed from %post.
пт, 26 апр. 2019 г. в 12:30, Petr Mensik :
>
> Hi!
>
> Is it still valid request to add update-desktop-database into %post,
> like mentioned by fedora-review tool [1]? Almost at the end of the
> comment. I were not able to find any information about it in Package
I am already updated spec and build version 2.0.95 for rawhide in mock.
пт, 19 апр. 2019 г. в 09:02, Vascom :
>
> I can take it.
> FAS name: vascom
>
> пт, 19 апр. 2019 г. в 05:37, Orion Poplawski :
> >
> > I'm going to orphan kdesvn as I no longer use it.
I can take it.
FAS name: vascom
пт, 19 апр. 2019 г. в 05:37, Orion Poplawski :
>
> I'm going to orphan kdesvn as I no longer use it. It needs updating:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1519347
>
> Let me know if you are interested in taking it over.
&
Look at chromium-vaapi build in rpmfusion.
пн, 11 мар. 2019 г., 20:17 Tom Callaway :
> Hi folks,
>
> I spent some time this weekend trying to get Chromium 72 building on
> Fedora, but I kept running into a C++ issue that I was not able to resolve.
> This happened with gcc-9.0.1-0.8.fc30.x86_64 an
Hi and welcome.
I am sorry but you can't became fedora maintainer with already existing package.
You should suggest new package for that.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers
Also you can send Pull Requests or talk with python-pycxx maintainer directly.
пн, 4 ма
Will it be in F29?
пт, 1 мар. 2019 г. в 17:05, Rex Dieter :
>
> Continuing work in master branch (aka fc31), pending
>
> fc30 work will continue when
> https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7966
> is processed for a f30-kde koji target. (Hopefully with enough time prior to
> beta freeze)
>
> -- Rex
> _
Hi all.
I am plan to retire package kchildlock from Fedora.
It is KDE4 application long time unsupported and FTBFS on rawhide and F30.
If no one need it I will retire package in one week.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/kchildlock
https://store.kde.org/p/1127875/
https://sourceforge.net/proje
No. If count as many times as many maintainers it has it will be about
3300 fails.
вт, 5 февр. 2019 г. в 14:32, Vít Ondruch :
>
>
> Dne 04. 02. 19 v 21:48 Mohan Boddu napsal(a):
>
> Hi all,
>
> Per the Fedora 30 schedule[1] we started a mass rebuild for Fedora 30
> on Jan 31st 2019. We did a mass
Why package gcc has version 9.0.0 but in changelog - 9.0.1?
пн, 21 янв. 2019 г. в 14:48, Björn 'besser82' Esser
:
>
> The update to GCC 9 broke the Rawhide buildroot for any package that
> (Build)Requires: gcc{,-c++} and/or libtool.
>
> I've already successfully rebuilt annobin and the rebuilt of
It must produce the same results as real hw.
Or mock parameter --forcearch must be removed.
пн, 14 янв. 2019 г. в 12:02, Dan Horák :
>
> On Mon, 14 Jan 2019 10:48:59 +0300
> Vascom wrote:
>
> > How about switch build rpms for exotic and slow arches (arm, s390...)
>
> arm
How about switch build rpms for exotic and slow arches (arm, s390...)
from hardware to cross-compile on x86_64?
mock can do it via qemu-user-static
пн, 14 янв. 2019 г. в 10:37, Dan Horák :
>
> On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 20:52:30 -0500
> Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 8:50 PM Neal Gompa
Do you mean STIBP?
It is alreasy disabled by default in 4.19 and 4.20.
ср, 9 янв. 2019 г. в 01:55, Joseph D. Wagner :
>
> IIRC, there is major performance degradation (anti-Spectre) in 4.20 that will
> be turned off by default 4.21.
>
> Will it be turned off by default in the 4.20 rebase?
>
> Jos
1 - 100 of 171 matches
Mail list logo
