ABI stability is entirely dependent on compiler version, AFAIK. Within the same
version of rustc there should be no issues with dynamic linking, of course
whenever we upgrade rustc we'd need a mass rebuild of every rust package but
we'd have to do the same thing with static linking.
--
devel mai
Rust supports dynamic linking, would it be worth investigating that route
instead of copying the proposed Go guidelines? I'm not against static linking
at all costs, but it would make package maintenance (especially security
updates) a lot more pleasant.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedorap
Rust uses LLVM for codegen, so in theory, yes. This excludes any potential
platform-specific bugs that may affect rustc, which are certainly a possibility.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
dependent packages
to see if there are any breaking changes would be nice too.
Stefan Nuxoll
> Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 11:46:34 +0100
> From: mschwe...@gmail.com
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Re: Unannounced soname bump: libpsl
>
> On Thu, 4 Feb 2016 04:21:59 -05
Hello -devel,
My name is Stefan Nuxoll, I am a new member of the Fedora QA team and I am also
looking to join the Package Collection Maintainers. I make heavy usage of
Fedora in my daily life - running Fedora 22 on my Dell XPS 13 for personal use,
in addition to a fleet of CentOS servers for
that runs an application packaged in the collection?
Stefan Nuxoll mailto:ste...@nuxoll.eu.org>>
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> From: ppi...@redhat.com
> Subject: Re: Packaged fonts? (and regular audits?)
> Date: Tue, 14 Jul 201
the upstream
(glyphicons.org).
Stefan Nuxoll mailto:ste...@nuxoll.eu.org>>
> Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 19:55:53 -0700
> Subject: Packaged fonts? (and regular audits?)
> From: davejohan...@gmail.com
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
&
r automatic
blanket-approval of new
> packagers.
The Fedora project already has a home for unreviewed packages, and
that's Copr, but it seems relatively few people know about it compared
to, say, Ubuntu's PPA's. I don't want to discourage people who truly
want to pu
>> This is a vicious cycle. A lot of sponsors are burnt out on trying to
>> deal with new people who don't seem to have a clue.
>
> Laziness, lack of activity, lack of interest, sloppy packaging,
> dumping-ground/fire'n'forget mentality, there are various factors.
This is unfortunately a common p
