Re: Staled PRs at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/

2024-01-25 Thread Smith, Stewart via devel
On Jan 24, 2024, at 11:07 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > During my work on SPDX migration I filed hundreds of pull request and as part > of that work I always check if there is > already open PRs for a package. > > It surprised me how many packages has open PR. I understand when there is > open PR

Re: Should we provide current/previous release links in URLs?

2023-07-30 Thread Smith, Stewart via devel
On Jul 19, 2023, at 1:24 AM, Stephen Smoogen wrote: On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 16:43 Kevin Fenzi mailto:ke...@scrye.com>> wrote: On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 05:59:50PM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: > As part of the cobbler project testing, we need to test accessing Fedora > releases with various URLs

Re: Restricting automounting of uncommon filesystems?

2023-07-30 Thread Smith, Stewart via devel
On Jul 24, 2023, at 12:11 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote: And frankly that is some of my motivation to find an improvement here. A small cadre of filesystem developers are near the breaking point trying to keep up with an army of machines running syzkaller. There’s also a large flow-on effect to those

Re: Restricting automounting of uncommon filesystems?

2023-07-30 Thread Smith, Stewart via devel
On Jul 24, 2023, at 7:47 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 10:08:50AM -0400, Demi Marie Obenour wrote: I saw that libguestfs has a guestmount(1) tool, and I think this could be a potential solution. An exploit against the kernel FS driver would only grant access to a KVM gue

Re: Restricting automounting of uncommon filesystems?

2023-07-30 Thread Smith, Stewart via devel
> On Jul 24, 2023, at 7:17 AM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 23 2023 at 11:18:45 PM -0400, Demi Marie Obenour > wrote: >> Then the mount needs to be done in a sandbox, such as a KVM guest or >> sandboxed userspace process. > > Hmmm... I don't think traditional sandboxing accomplishe

Re: F40 Change: Privacy-preserving Telemetry for Fedora Workstation (System-Wide)

2023-07-21 Thread Smith, Stewart via devel
> On Jul 7, 2023, at 7:09 AM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 6 2023 at 09:27:47 PM +0200, Florian Weimer > wrote: >> What about packages which already collect metrics and report them >> somewhere (not necessarily to Red Hat)? Would these packages need to >> change under this proposal

Re: CentOS Stream, RHEL, and Fedora [was Re: What is Fedora?]

2023-07-02 Thread Smith, Stewart via devel
On Jun 24, 2023, at 8:05 AM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 24 2023 at 08:53:32 AM -0500, Chris Adams > wrote: >>> Is it? At one point, there were considerable gaps in security >>> updates; >> RHEL 9.x would get an update while CentOS Stream 9 (as the target for >> RHEL 9.[x+1]) didn'

Re: CentOS Stream, RHEL, and Fedora [was Re: What is Fedora?]

2023-07-02 Thread Smith, Stewart via devel
> On Jun 22, 2023, at 2:01 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: >> >>> >>> ELN is a build of (some) Fedora packages with EL-specific options, so >>> it requires Fedora. >> ELN can exist off an internal non fedora tree. Just depends who is >> updating the tree. > > Sure, but... that's the _opposite_ of th

Distro feature macros: a replacement for many %if rhel/fedora/amzn

2023-07-02 Thread Smith, Stewart via devel
Myself and a few others over in Amazon Linux land have been musing for a while about possible improvements that could be done in Fedora to help make Fedora and downstream distributions (such as CentOS Stream and Amazon Linux) have an easier and simpler time having their individual opinionated ch

Re: Orphaning packages (was LibreOffice packages)

2023-07-01 Thread Smith, Stewart via devel
On Jun 29, 2023, at 7:47 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote: > Here is a list of Fedora packages which I maintained or co-maintained which I > won't be able to contribute to anymore: > > sloccount I grabbed sloccount as I’ve found it useful over the years. It looks the right level of incredibly low main

Re: Firecracker microVM manager

2023-03-17 Thread Smith, Stewart via devel
On Mar 5, 2023, at 10:19 AM, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > > > David Michael wrote: >> - Firecracker can be built with Fedora's libc (glibc), but it is >> officially unsupported upstream[3]. Functionality would be harmed by >> not using musl, e.g. seccomp filters are not used. > > Upstream'

Re: What should we do about "shopping list" groups in comps?

2023-01-31 Thread Smith, Stewart via devel
> On Jan 31, 2023, at 2:39 PM, Adam Williamson > wrote: > > Hey folks! > > I've sort of happened into doing some maintenance of fedora-comps over > the last few years. Something that bugs me while working on this is how > many "shopping list" groups we still have. I'm talking about things > l

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2022-12-19 Thread Smith, Stewart via devel
> On Dec 19, 2022, at 7:55 AM, Gwyn Ciesla via devel > wrote: > > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click > links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the > content is safe. > > > > I've taken abiword and libgnomeui. As always

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2022-12-19 Thread Smith, Stewart via devel
> On Dec 19, 2022, at 7:43 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure > that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: > https://fedorapro

Re: Non-responsive maintainer for lz4 package (pjp)

2022-12-12 Thread Smith, Stewart via devel
> On Dec 9, 2022, at 8:29 AM, Timothée Ravier wrote: > > Hey folks, > > I've started the non-responsive maintainer procedure for pjp > (https://accounts.fedoraproject.org/user/pjp/) with > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2152159 > > I currently have a pull request that has been b

Re: Explicit dependency on systemd-rpm-macros now required?

2022-09-14 Thread Smith, Stewart via devel
> On Sep 14, 2022, at 4:17 AM, Tom Hughes via devel > wrote: > >> On 14/09/2022 12:11, Florian Weimer wrote: >> I see some new build failures in rawhide related to systemd RPM macros: >> >> Processing files: opencryptoki-3.18.0-4.fc38.s390x >> error: File must begin with "/": %{_tmpfilesdir}/o