Re: dracut image missing after installing 6.12.5 kernel, where to report it?

Hi, On Sun, Dec 29, 2024 at 12:59 AM Barry wrote: > > I have downgraded dkms to 3.0.13-2.fc41 and initramfs was generated as > expected. Looks like a bug exists already too: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=282 > > This is affecting a lot of users as evidenced by reports of th

Re: Orphaning most of my packages

On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 10:46 PM Kalev Lember wrote: > I think Simone Caronni would be the best person for miniupnpc, but I can > take it as well as a last resort if needed. I left it orphaned for now. > Taken, thanks. --Simone -- You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the c

Re: Updating xorg-x11-server

> xorg-x11-server is ready, I just fixed last issue which was with > Nouveau drive > > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/driver/xf86-video-nouveau/-/merge_requests/10 As mentioned in the thread, I'll proceed. Thanks. -- You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to lose sight

Re: Updating xorg-x11-server

On Fri, Sep 6, 2024 at 2:50 PM Sérgio Basto wrote: > I'd like to understand, so what in "X server 21.1" broke ? from this > thread [1] only 340xx driver stopped to work , 390xx supports xorg-21.1 > Both these branches are dead, 340 in 2019 and 390 in 2022. -- You cannot discover new oceans unl

Re: Updating xorg-x11-server

On Thu, Sep 5, 2024 at 6:55 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > My understanding is the reason we hadn't was because of the NVIDIA > binary driver. For the desktops that still use X11 and the X11 DDX > instead of the modesetting driver, that could be a problem if the ABI > broke. > I think this is no longer

Re: Updating xorg-x11-server

Hi Sergio, On Thu, Sep 5, 2024 at 5:26 PM Sérgio Basto wrote: > I already did the PR > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/xorg-x11-server/pull-request/21 > > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sergiomb/xorg-x11-server/builds/ Yes, that's the merge request I was mentioning. Thanks, --Si

Updating xorg-x11-server

Hi everyone, I've noticed that we're really behind on xorg-x11-server releases (almost 3 years!) and that by rebasing we would drop tons of patches that have already been upstreamed during this time. No one that is listed in the maintainer list of that package seems to have been active on it for

Re: Orphaned: egl-wayland, egl-gbm and eglexternalplatform

On Wed, Aug 7, 2024 at 4:38 PM Leigh Scott wrote: > Does 1.1.14 git snapshot work with older driver releases eg =: 470xx and > 550xx? > The last stable release generated negative karma, issues with firefox. > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-d4e659da2c Seems to be, it also

Re: Orphaned: egl-wayland, egl-gbm and eglexternalplatform

Hi Oliver, On Fri, Aug 2, 2024 at 10:35 AM Olivier Fourdan wrote: > But there is also more flexibility in having those separate from what > ships with the driver, for example, there are currently several issues > affecting egl-wayland 1.1.14 and the latest driver and fixes are being > posted to

Re: Mass rebuild failures only on ppc64le: glibc problem?

Hello, On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 6:07 AM, Josh Stone wrote: > On 07/26/2017 06:23 PM, Josh Stone wrote: > >> I did some other random checks and found a few other packages with > >> ppc64le-only build failures: freeipa, gammu, gap-pkg-float, gambas3, > >> getdp (and I stopped looking after that).

Re: mp3 encoding now ok

Hello, On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 6:24 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 05:13:14PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > For clarity someone with authority presumably ought to remove "MP3 > Support" > > from the list of Forbidden items that package reviewers are required to > > ch

Re: mp3 encoding now ok

On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 9:37 PM, Simone Caronni wrote: > Hello, > > On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 6:17 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz > wrote: > >> On 2017-05-03 12:44, Christian Schaller wrote: >> >>> So just wanted everyone to know that we now have the go ahead to shi

Re: mp3 encoding now ok

Hello, On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 6:17 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > On 2017-05-03 12:44, Christian Schaller wrote: > >> So just wanted everyone to know that we now have the go ahead to ship mp3 >> encoding in Fedora too. So anyone involved with packaging >> mp3 encoders can now start migrating them

Re: [review-swap] swatchbooker

Hi Luya, On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 8:19 AM, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: > I am looking for swaping review with swatchbooker: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441046 > An odd issue is the startup of the application with the correct path > within the binary leaving baffled. Improvemen

Re: libdbusmenu upgrade in Fedora rawhide (and eventually in Fedora 26, 25)

On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 10:06 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > I agree , IMHO it should go also to Fedora 25, because it is a bug that > could be fixed before F25 release ... > > Refining your query: > dnf --releasever=rawhide --disablerepo='*' --enablerepo=rawhide > repoquery --available --whatrequire

libdbusmenu upgrade in Fedora rawhide (and eventually in Fedora 26, 25)

Hello, it seems that libdbusmenu has been mostly neglected since Fedora 20: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/libdbusmenu.git/ There is a bug affecting Steam on most platforms due to the version of libdbusmenu being too old: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4449 That could

Re: Move Fedora 25 Vinagre / Weston dependency to FreeRDP 1.2 compatiblity package

On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 1:47 PM, Simone Caronni wrote: > > Ah, I missed that guidelines. I would need a re-review of it. > Re-review for the rename created: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432975 Dominik, I've added you in CC. Regards, --Simone -- You cannot disco

Re: Move Fedora 25 Vinagre / Weston dependency to FreeRDP 1.2 compatiblity package

On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 12:54 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski < domi...@greysector.net> wrote: > Hello, Simone. > > On Thursday, 16 March 2017 at 10:27, Simone Caronni wrote: > [...] > > Guacamole / Vinagre / Weston: latest 1.2 release (compat-freerdp12) >

Move Fedora 25 Vinagre / Weston dependency to FreeRDP 1.2 compatiblity package

Hi all, I would like to move Vinagre / Weston in Fedora 25 to use the new FreeRDP 1.2 compatibility package that I created. This would allow me to update FreeRDP and Remmina to the same snapshot that is in Fedora 26/rawhide. Both of these things have been done already in Fedora 26/rawhide. FreeRD

Re: Offering to co maintain lv2 related packages (lv2, lilv, suil, serd, sord, sratom...)

Hello, On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 9:36 AM, Guido Aulisi wrote: > Hello, > I recently joined the packager group and I made 2 audio related > packages (setBfree and lv2-ir-plugins). > I noticed that lv2 related packages are behind upstream releases, and I > know there are important bug fixes in these

Re: EL7 update stuck in pending/testing for a week

On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 9:49 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: > No, it's paused while I've been boot strapping aarch64, it should > start moving again shortly. > Ah ok, thanks. --Simone -- You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to lose sight of the shore (R. W. Emerson). http:/

EL7 update stuck in pending/testing for a week

Hello, I've tried to push a couple of new libraries in epel-7, but the update did not reach the testing repository in 7 days: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-e4793acdf5 Is there anything wrong with it? It doesn't seem any different than the other updates. Can someone loo

Re: Freerdp update with bundle in guacamole-server

On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 12:20 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: > Simone, > > Could the old version of FreeRDP be temporarily bundled into guacamole > server for F23 so that everything else can be updated and rebuilt? > We can, but it's not up to me to decide. I can change the spec file and make a %global va

Re: Freerdp update with bundle in guacamole-server

On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 4:29 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: > No. I want to suggest that continuing to say things like "It is ok to > leave it disabled/Broken in Fedora 24..." is bad. People read text > like that and continue to think Rawhide is a dumping ground. Disabled > is one thing, but broken is

Re: Freerdp update with bundle in guacamole-server

On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: > And yes, as current version of Remmina has much errors in Fedora 23 I want > update it to 1.2.0-rcgit.5 in that branch too. > Please make sure that for Fedora 23 you are not breaking Guacamole though. It is ok to leave it disabled/Broken in

Re: Freerdp update with bundle in guacamole-server

On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 2:54 PM, Simone Caronni wrote: > Hello, > > as you've said, after continuous issues, the Guacamole developers are not > willing to update to unreleased versions/tarballs. > > I've briefly talked with David Woodhouse offlist a few days ago and I

Re: Freerdp update with bundle in guacamole-server

y bugs which should be fixed upstream, but I still can't update. > > > 14.11.2015 22:20, Neal Gompa wrote: > >> I am not the maintainer of guacamole-server. That is Simone Caronni >> (who I cc'd to this email) according to PkgDB[0]. Simone is the one >> you

Re: virt-manager - libappindicator-gtk3 - remmina

On 4 June 2015 at 03:24, Kevin Kofler wrote: > ndeed, you missed: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2014-March/196343.html > > libappindicator is now (since Fedora 22) also REQUIRED for GTK+ system tray > applets to work under KDE Plasma. (Plasma 5 no longer supports the legacy >

Re: virt-manager - libappindicator-gtk3 - remmina

On 3 June 2015 at 14:28, Giovanni Panozzo wrote: > > Adding Antenore to this thread, the other Remmina developer left on the > whole earth :) > > My small contribution: Remmina can survive without libappindicators. It > will fallback to use GtkStatusIcon to show its icon under Xfce/Lxde/Kde > (no

Re: virt-manager - libappindicator-gtk3 - remmina

On 3 June 2015 at 12:09, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > > If I remember correctly there was a time when people were discussing > about > > bringing Unity in Fedora. This did not happen, and actually the library > is > > pretty useless as there is no libappindicator consumer right now. I'm not > > sure

Re: virt-manager - libappindicator-gtk3 - remmina

On 3 June 2015 at 11:28, Pavel Alexeev wrote: > Hi, >Is not it virt-manager problem or libappindicator? Shouldn't it be > addressed there? > > If I remember correctly there was a time when people were discussing about bringing Unity in Fedora. This did not happen, and actually the librar

Re: virt-manager - libappindicator-gtk3 - remmina

In Fedora 21 it was already disabled. Disabled it also on f22 and master branches. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/remmina-1.2.0-0.6.git.b3237e8.fc22 Regards, --Simone On 1 June 2015 at 11:20, poma wrote: > > libappindicator-gtk3 breaks virt-manager's systray functionality, > precisel

Re: Testing request: gdm-on-Wayland on hybrid graphics laptops (esp. Macbooks)

Hello, On 14/05/2015 20:01:21 GMT, Adam Williamson > wrote: > >> Hi folks! >> >> We have a somewhat-worrying proposed blocker for F22: >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1218787 > > I have some issues with two different laptops, one with an Intel/Nvidia combo and one with an Intel/

Re: Orphaning iscan-firmware (Firmware for Epson flatbed scanners)

Hello, On 13 January 2015 at 14:55, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski < domi...@greysector.net> wrote: > Dear Fedora Community, > I'm orphaning the iscan-firmware package since I no longer have even > one Epson scanner which would require it. Hopefully someone else > with one of the supported scanne

FreeRDP rawhide rebuild

FreeRDP is dropping monolithic builds in the latest release: https://github.com/FreeRDP/FreeRDP/commit/0313ca3622baec53425b749e65caa202015894de All these libraries are no longer available. libfreerdp-cache.so.1.2()(64bit) libfreerdp-codec.so.1.2()(64bit) libfreerdp-common.so.1.2.0()(64bit) libfr

Re: Are we rebasing xorg-x11 packages in F20?

On 25 November 2014 at 13:20, Lukas Zapletal wrote: > I don't understand why I noticed this today, it looks like the latest > update was a Critical Path one (???) when Fedora 20 was stable for six > months. > > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-7331/xorg-x11-server-utils-7.7-6

Re: RFC: xserver update strategy in F21+

On 17 November 2014 20:06, Adam Jackson wrote: > Since the modular X repackaging in FC5, we have limited X server updates > such that the ABI does not change. F20 shipped with xserver 1.14.4, for > example, so we might update it to 1.14.7 but not to 1.15.0. With the > reduced driver set in F21

File system error in Koji

Hello, there seems to be some issue in the builders: freerdp-1.2.0-0.3.beta.1.fc22 (592521) failed on arm04-builder03.arm.fedoraproject.org (noarch), arm02-builder21.arm.fedoraproject.org (armhfp): Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site- packages/koji/daemon.py", lin

Re: Mass reassign and orphan: steve

Hello, On 11 November 2014 01:03, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > openvpn -- A full-featured SSL VPN solution ( master f21 f20 f19 epel7 el6 > el5 ) > is this still available? It seems is not: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/openvpn/ As a user I would like to take it. Regards, --Si

Re: PROPOSAL: Make AppData files mandatory for applications shown in the software center

Hello, first of all sorry if I missed this earlier, I can't hardly cope with all mails received on devel. I tried to read them all when I can. As the maintainer of these: bacula-console-bat > bacula-traymonitor I would suggest them to be removed from the software center, they are far from "bein

Re: Looking for xorg-x11-* package co-maintainers

Out of the previous list, the only ones that have not been updated yet are: -intel-gpu-tools 1.8 (1.7 in rawhide/f21) -xkeyboard-config 2.13 (2.12 in rawhide/f21) -xcb-util 0.4.0 (0.3.9 in rawhide/f21) -libxcb 1.11 (1.10 in f21) -xrandr 1.4.3 (1.4.2 in f21) -twm-1.0.8 (1.0.7 in f21) -imake 1.0.7 (

Re: Looking for xorg-x11-* package co-maintainers

On 22 October 2014 11:25, Hans de Goede wrote: > You do not need to be a hardcore X hacker to help here. 2 things > with which I really could use help is keeping all the various bits > and pieces up2date with upstream releases, and taking care of > simple (packaging) bugs were possible. > > To gi

Re: Samba as AD DC

Hello, 2014-09-07 14:58 GMT-03:00 Simo Sorce : > > On Sun, 2014-09-07 at 01:12 -0300, Sergio Belkin wrote: >> > Is (Samba) Fedora 20 still not capable of being Active Directory Domain >> > Controller? >> >> It is current, and Samba in F20 will never have the AD bits. >> Maybe F22, or perhaps even

Re: FreeRDP bump in rawhide

On 23 June 2014 08:39, Simone Caronni wrote: > I'm about to bump FreeRDP in Rawhide to the newly released version 1.2.0 > beta 1. This allows us to build Remmina that is currently FTBFS. > > Of all the packages that are using FreeRDP, only Weston is the one for > which I d

Re: Looking for co-maintainers

Hello, On 27 June 2014 12:52, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:> Currently guacamole-client is in FTBFS in rawhide [2] and I couldn't find > > any help for fixing it due to a Maven bug [3], that requires a specific > > Fedora workaround that I frankly don't understand [4]. On RHEL 7, and > > Fedora 19/20

Looking for co-maintainers

Hello, I'm looking for co-maintainers for the Guacamole [1] stack packages. It is an HTML 5 plugin-less remote desktop for VNC, RDP, SSH, Telnet and Spice (WIP). Upstream is really responsive, software is updated frequently and it's really amazing. I've been able to throw a bunch of Citrix XenApp

Re: Patches for trivial bugs sitting in bugzilla -> trivial patch policy?

+1 from me! On Jun 26, 2014 5:51 PM, "Sandro Mani" wrote: > Hi, > > From time to time, I see trivial patches posted in bugzilla which end up > sitting there because the maintainer is too busy / gets bombarded with tons > of bugzilla mails and misses that particular one / whatever reason. As a > p

FreeRDP bump in rawhide

Hello, I'm about to bump FreeRDP in Rawhide to the newly released version 1.2.0 beta 1. This allows us to build Remmina that is currently FTBFS. Of all the packages that are using FreeRDP, only Weston is the one for which I don't have any commit access, so it needs to be rebuilt. I've tested a mo

Re: rfc: xserver rebase in F20 (was Re: Slipping F21)

Hello, On 11 June 2014 19:11, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > Hi, why not begin by a xserver rebase in copr ? > > > > Personally, because I don't feel like doing the work twice. But if > > someone else wants to, sure, go for it. > > I could do it, also think about do it for eclipse-swt , but my probl

Re: Fedora GIT error (access denied)

On 27 May 2014 15:31, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Tue, 27 May 2014 09:05:21 +0200 > Simone Caronni wrote: > > If this is not the place for notifying such things, please redirect me > > where appropriate. > > Usually a releng or infrastructure ticket or #fedora-admin /

Fedora GIT error (access denied)

Hello, I'm unable to commit to the newly unretired ndoutils package in the fedora branches (I'm the owner). This is the error I get: $ git push Counting objects: 10, done. Delta compression using up to 4 threads. Compressing objects: 100% (2/2), done. Writing objects: 100% (2/2), 270 bytes | 0 by

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Workstation: Disable firewall

On 15 April 2014 14:35, Christopher wrote: > Whoa, the fact that the Firewall is on by default in Fedora (along > with SELinux) is one of the reasons I choose Fedora over alternatives. > Same thing here, It was really surprising to see it as a proposed feature. How can it be that after years we

Re: bumblebee reviewer needed (Was: Re: Heads up: retiring xorg-x11-drv-mouse and xorg-x11-drv-keyboard)

On 3 April 2014 06:50, Christopher Meng wrote: > Just another note that due to my knowledge on optimus I decide to drop > the review of bumblebee[1], and someone told me it's just a dirty > hack. > I personally think it as a hack as well. Problems with Nouveau performance and power managment asi

Re: Retired update still showing in updates-testing

On 13 March 2014 20:01, Rex Dieter wrote: > Did you delete the bodhi updates too? If so, (in short), don't do that. > To tell the truth I don't remember, but I think I did. So updates that are retired should be left as they are without deleting them so they still appear listed in Bodhi? Is thi

Re: Retired update still showing in updates-testing

On 14 March 2014 00:00, Jon wrote: > Done! > > $ koji untag-build --force f19-updates-testing > guacamole-client-0.8.3-5.fc19 > $ koji untag-build --force f20-updates-testing > guacamole-client-0.8.3-5.fc20 > Thanks, --Simone -- You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to lo

Re: Retired update still showing in updates-testing

On 13 March 2014 09:33, Mathieu Bridon wrote: > The solution is for you to untag the builds: > > $ koji untag-pkg f19-updates-testing guacamole-client-0.8.3-5.fc19 > $ koji untag-pkg f20-updates-testing guacamole-client-0.8.3-5.fc20 > > Then at the next mash, they will be gone. > > I have no idea

Retired update still showing in updates-testing

Hello, I pushed two packages as updates in bodhi a few weeks ago, but even before they reached updates-testing I revoked them. Now, after some weeks, I see that both are available from updates-testing but I don't see them in Bodhi. They are not in my list of updates or the generic updates-testing

Re: Orphaning simple scan

Hello, On 9 March 2014 13:34, David King wrote: > I would like to be a co-maintainer, as I use Simple Scan on a regular > basis, and as a GNOME contributor I am also familiar with the GNOME > schedule that Kalev mentioned. > > I have requested commit privileges in pkgdb. > permissions granted.

Re: Orphaning simple scan

On 8 March 2014 18:24, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > I don't have direct access to a personal scanner anymore and don't have > the time to handle bug reports without a device to test. I have orphaned > simple scan now. Please feel free to take it. > Thanks for maintaining this so far, I've taken it

Unretiring NDOUtils

Hello, I would like to unretire NDOUtils in Fedora, I'm currently using it at work. NDOUtils was orphaned in Fedora in 2012 [1], but since the EPEL 5 & 6 branches cannot be retired, those branches were still there. The previous owner gave the branch ownership to me, so I'm missing only the Fedora

Re: libxnvctrl status?

On 4 February 2014 11:03, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > Correct, we could - Similar things are being done at several places in > Fedora. > > Somewhat oversimplified, the basic requirement is all shipped binaries > must be built from OSI-compiliant sources-code and no closed-sources be > used. Well, t

Re: libxnvctrl status?

Hello, On 4 February 2014 04:58, Christopher Meng wrote: > Is this library disallowed now because it's from nvidia? Or it should be > retired? In my opinion it should be removed from Fedora. Currently it is used by very few packages: mate-sensors-applet hwloc nvclock oyranos The current 169.

Retiring mod_auth_xradius

Hello, I'm planning to retire mod_auth_xradius from Fedora. The module in its source form is really buggy: - It has been patched to avoid a library bundling. - Some patches have been added to restore some basic functionality that was not otherwise working. - Upstream asked me to update and file

Re: Source file audit - 2014-01-05

On 7 January 2014 19:31, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > Looking at the lookaside cache directly, it looks like that file has been > uploaded previously (in lookaside, there's currently two tarballs for > dkms-2.2.0.3.tar.gz with two separate md5sums). > Thanks, who was mantaining it before me uploaded

Re: Source file audit - 2014-01-05

On 6 January 2014 20:53, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > slaanesh:BADSOURCE:dkms-2.2.0.3.tar.gz:dkms > Downloading the file again gives a different md5sum, but the release tarball is the same, so probably the archive has been regenerated. What's the procedure to update the source files in the lookaside ca

Re: Retiring gksu-polkit

On 5 December 2013 00:26, Dan Mashal wrote: > It seems that this package is no longer needed. Please let me know > there is a reason that we should keep it. Will retire on all Fedora > releases next week. I think it's still used by Wireshark; last time I've build it was to close some bugs upon

Re: F21 Self Contained Change: Replace Bacula with Bareos

Hello, On 16 November 2013 02:09, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Simone Caronni wrote: > > Bareos is currently in standby following some legal issues: > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Forbidden_items#Bareos > > Can we know what the issues are? Switching would lo

Re: Enabling "-Werror=format-security" by default

On 20 November 2013 17:25, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > First... I'd suggest posting the list of packages and give maintainers > a week or two to just fix them. Then before filing anything you can run > a quick check to see which packages are still needing fixing. > Yes please, sometimes the automated b

Re: F21 Self Contained Change: Replace Bacula with Bareos

2013 13:03, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > = Proposed Self Contained Change: Replace Bacula with Bareos = > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Bareos > > Change Owner(s): Simone Caronni > > The powerful Bacula network backup solution has switched from being Open > Source frien

Re: What is support status of PowerVR GPUs in Fedora? (Intel D2500 and gma500_gfx)

On 14 November 2013 16:19, valent.turko...@gmail.com < valent.turko...@gmail.com> wrote: > Here are all logs I captured: > > cpuinfo: http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=7M7uKBA5 > lspci: http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=2JFb3EnQ > dmesg: http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=8pQ5C8wJ > Xorg.0.log.gma500: http://p

Re: User/Group ID assignment

Hello, On 22 October 2013 13:25, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote: > Are there any guidelines regarding user and group id number assignment > on Fedora? > please read the packaging guidelines regarding user creation at rpm install time: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:UsersAndGroups As a rul

Re: Source file audit - 2013-09-30

Check ok on my side: $ wget http://linux.dell.com/dkms/permalink/dkms-2.2.0.3.tar.gz --2013-10-04 08:54:36-- http://linux.dell.com/dkms/permalink/dkms-2.2.0.3.tar.gz Resolving linux.dell.com (linux.dell.com)... 143.166.224.62 Connecting to linux.dell.com (linux.dell.com)|143.166.224.62|:80... conn

Re: Koji build fails because source package is not found.

Hello, On 30 August 2013 09:05, Erwin Waterlander wrote: > error: File /builddir/build/SOURCES/wcd-5.**2.4-src.tar.gz: No such file > or directory > > What should I do to fix this error? I was in the assumption that the > source package is automatically downloaded via the info in the spec file.

Builds using latex2html gets stuck infinitely (#994883)

Hello, can someone please check this latex2html bug [1]? I've reported it many times on this list on a different thread but somehow it went unnoticed. I know user jnovy has left Redhat, but the package is still owned by him [2] and is blocking my builds since the beginning of August. Shouldn't th

Re: Doc dir related changes coming up

On 8 August 2013 16:03, Michael J Gruber < michaeljgruber+fedora-li...@gmail.com> wrote: > Building an F20 (master) package on F18 does not work, then, even with > the proposed conditional %{_pkgdocdir}. Wouldn't a conditional based on > the Fedora version be a much more robust suggestion to deal

Re: latex not working in F20: "I can't find the format file `latex.fmt'!"

Hello Than, On 8 August 2013 14:47, Than Ngo wrote: > the buildrequirement is not correct, please replace your BR with these: > > BuildRequires: ghostscript > BuildRequires: texlive-collection-latexrecommended texlive-preprint > can you please check this bug? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show

Re: Koji 404 errors on el6

Thanks very much! --Simone On 8 August 2013 13:48, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Thu, 8 Aug 2013 10:58:48 +0200 > Simone Caronni wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > I get the following when building for el6/ppc: > > ...snip... > > > I've already tried 2

Re: Excludearch/Exclusivearch reminder

On 8 August 2013 10:44, Petr Pisar wrote: > And the canonical RPM architecture name is what? "arm" or "armv7hl" or some > macro like %{ix86}? Yep. At the moment for my local builds I use "armv7hl" because the package I build works only on armv7 with hfp; but would be good to know if there is a

Koji 404 errors on el6

Hello, I get the following when building for el6/ppc: DEBUG util.py:264: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/repo/rhel/rhel-ppc64-server-6/getPackage/nss-softokn-3.12.9-11.el6.ppc64.rpm: [Errno 14] PYCURL ERROR 22 - "The requested URL returned error: 404 Not Found" DEBUG util.py:264: Trying other

Re: Problem with mass rebuild / latex2html errors

On 5 August 2013 12:14, Simone Caronni wrote: > I have a problem on the bacula-docs package in Fedora 20. Build was stuck > for 15 hours and then killed by Koji: > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5698742 > > I was able to reproduce it locally with mock; a

Re: gdcm FTBFS: texlive broken in rawhide?

On 6 August 2013 17:38, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > Package owner Jindrich Novy is no longer in Red Hat so I am not sure how > quickly it may get fixed. > I really hope the next mantainer can manage a 14 mb spec file :) Regards, --Simone -- You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the co

Re: latex not working in F20: "I can't find the format file `latex.fmt'!"

On 5 August 2013 15:43, punto...@libero.it wrote: > Il 05/08/2013 15:32, Richard W.M. Jones ha scritto: > > On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 03:16:15PM +0200, Than Ngo wrote: > > have you built it localy or in koji? could you please give me the url if it > fails in koji? > > Both. I can easily reprod

Re: latex not working in F20: "I can't find the format file `latex.fmt'!"

It took me a really long time to get package ownership from Andreas Thienemann. He would reply only to mails to avoid losing package ownership and nothing else. I had to file an fpc ticket as well. On Aug 5, 2013 8:44 PM, "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote: > On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 05:59:34PM +0100, Ric

Re: latex not working in F20: "I can't find the format file `latex.fmt'!"

On 5 August 2013 15:32, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 03:16:15PM +0200, Than Ngo wrote: > > > > have you built it localy or in koji? could you please give me the url if > it fails in koji? > Mine was in the first mail: http://koji

Re: Problem with mass rebuild / latex2html errors

On 5 August 2013 12:14, Simone Caronni wrote: > I have a problem on the bacula-docs package in Fedora 20. Build was stuck > for 15 hours and then killed by Koji: > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5698742/<http://negativo17.org/> > Would like to po

Problem with mass rebuild / latex2html errors

Hello, I have a problem on the bacula-docs package in Fedora 20. Build was stuck for 15 hours and then killed by Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5698742 I was able to reproduce it locally with mock; all the "latex2html" commands get stuck indefinitely. An example command

Re: Rename Review Request swap

On 22 July 2013 07:03, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > For Java-related reviews you are welcome to block Java SIG tracker bug > (FE-JAVASIG, rhbz #652183). This way members of Java SIG can easily see > that there is a new review and take care of it. > Good to know, thanks, I will do next time! Regar

Re: Rename Review Request swap

Sure! I'll do tomorrow morning. Thanks & regards. Sent from my phone! --Simone On Jul 21, 2013 7:29 PM, "punto...@libero.it" wrote: > Il 21/07/2013 16:00, Simone Caronni ha scritto: > > Anyone willing to review these 2 packages? > > https://bugzilla.redhat

Rename Review Request swap

Anyone willing to review these 2 packages? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=985818 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=985814 They are a rename of older packages; upstream has consolidated multiple source tarballs into one thus simplifying building: http://koji.fedoraproject.o

Re: [aarch64 bugs] dpkg: Does not support aarch64 in f19 and rawhide bug #925276

On 17 June 2013 09:04, Dan Horák wrote: > the fedora-packager package provides wrappers for the koji command for > all secondary architectures in Fedora in the form ${arch}-koji, where > arch can be arm, ppc and s390, so you can use > > arm-koji build --scratch f19 your.src.rpm > Oh, thanks, I d

Re: [aarch64 bugs] dpkg: Does not support aarch64 in f19 and rawhide bug #925276

On 17 June 2013 03:13, Sérgio Basto wrote: > we had updated dpkg some major versions sine bug opened, how I know if > dpkg is now ready for aarch64 ? > I've discovered you can trigger builds for the ARM Koji instance with your account: koji --server=http://arm.koji.fedoraproject.org/kojihub bui

Provenpackager help (pango)

Hello, sorry to ask again for people from the provenpackagers group but I don't know how could I fix it. Can someone apply the small patch pasted here in the bug [1] and issue a pango update for Fedora 18? [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902861 Thanks & regards, --Simone -- Yo

Re: [Fedora-packaging] arched BuildRequires?

Hello, On 13 June 2013 17:00, Björn Esser wrote: > Hi there! > > I have a question about this review: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889261 > > Is it ok to havearched BuildRequires? > > In my opinion they should NOT be arched, because of the reasons given in > the comments of the

Differences between mock and koji?

Hello, I have a package that builds fine in a fresh rawhide mock chroot and not in a koji build. Is there any difference between the two? Here is the error in Koji: + make -j5 LIBPATH=/usr/lib64 -f makefile docs rm -f doc/crypt.pdf *.dvi *.log *.aux *.toc *.idx *.ilg *.ind *.out echo "hello" > c

Provenpackager help

Hello, any provenpackager willing to push these 2 fixes? One is really trivial and the other one is simply a typo. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883983 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948613 Thanks & regards, --Simone -- You cannot discover new oceans unless you have

Re: Unresponsive mantainer process - bacula package

Well, he just replied. Nevermind. On 3 June 2013 12:42, Simone Caronni wrote: > Hello, > > following on the mail at: > > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/179574 > > I've filed the "unresponsive mantainer bug" for the bacula pack

Unresponsive mantainer process - bacula package

Hello, following on the mail at: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/179574 I've filed the "unresponsive mantainer bug" for the bacula package: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970016 No package updates were committed, no commits in the git repositories; no bug

Unresponsive mantainer process - dkms package

Hello, I'm following the unresponsive mantainer policy [1] for the package dkms; I'm at the second week trying to get a response (point 4 of the process). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=965712 Does anyone know any other mail address to contact the mantainer? In the bug comments I'v

Re: Software Management call for RFEs

On 24 May 2013 22:02, Przemek Klosowski wrote: > On 05/23/2013 07:52 AM, Simone Caronni wrote: > > I fiddle around with a new Nagios installation, then something stops >> working. I'm pretty sure it is some modifications in >> /etc/nagios/nagios.cfg but I cannot track

Re: Software Management call for RFEs

On 23 May 2013 17:38, James Antill wrote: > On Thu, 2013-05-23 at 13:52 +0200, Simone Caronni wrote: > > mv /etc/nagios/nagios.cfg /etc/nagios/nagios.cfg.mine > > yum reinstall nagios --onlyfile /etc/nagios/nagios.cfg > > How is this functionally different from "yum

  1   2   >