Great,
Sure, I'll leave comments there once would achieve some progress.
19.06.2015, 07:21, "Rex Dieter" :
> Rex Dieter wrote:
>
>> Rex Dieter wrote:
>>
>>> Ruslan Nigmatullin wrote:
>>>
>>>> 12.06.2015, 16:32, "Rex Dieter&q
12.06.2015, 16:32, "Rex Dieter" :
> Ruslan Nigmatullin wrote:
>
>>> Are you willing to help work on it? :)
>>
>> Sure, I may have a look. How can I start?
>
> Start by identifying precisely what should be declared as private. Offhand
> I see:
&g
11.06.2015, 10:01, "Rex Dieter" :
> Ruslan Nigmatullin wrote:
>
>> I've just noticed that there are not separate packages for private headers
>> of Qt 5 in Fedora but there is one for Qt 4.
>
> The Qt4 one was just a hack (for qt-creator).
The issu
${qt5_version} instead of
qt5-qtbase == ${qt5_version} which may be source of various errors (because Qt
doesn't guarantee API/ABI compatibility for private headers).
Is it made on purpose and how does Fedora guarantee that nothing breaks in case
of Qt's minor/patch updates?
--
Rusla
