Hi,
I've just noticed that there are not separate packages for private headers of
Qt 5 in Fedora but there is one for Qt 4. Also I've checked specs of some
packages like qt5-qtdeclarative which uses private headers during the
compilation and their rpms depends on qt5-qtbase >= ${qt5_version} instead of
qt5-qtbase == ${qt5_version} which may be source of various errors (because Qt
doesn't guarantee API/ABI compatibility for private headers).
Is it made on purpose and how does Fedora guarantee that nothing breaks in case
of Qt's minor/patch updates?
--
Ruslan Nigmatullin
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
