Neal Gompa wrote:
> As one of the upstream developers for the kiwi image build tool, I
> have no intention of removing SquashFS support. It's perfectly fine
> and usable. My only issue with it is that using unsquashfs to install
> live environments causes the environment to freeze, which is not
>
Gao Xiang wrote:
> On 2025/1/17 17:40, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 2:17 AM Phillip Lougher
> > phillip.loug...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Neal Gompa wrote:
> > Thank you, I appreciate whatever you can do to make things better for
> > our use-cases. :)
Neal Gompa wrote:
> > Thank you, I appreciate whatever you can do to make things better for
> our use-cases. :)
Well it is obvious where your bias lies.
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le
Gao Xiang wrote:
> > By doing this they deliberately reduce the compression and speed of
> > Squashfs in their tests. This IMHO is biased and unethical. But that is
> > how it is.
> > Also if I were a random filesystem author, I will never argue just due to
> > lack of development resource.
how it is.
So far this proposal looks like something from the EROFS marketing department
and is remarkably light in motivations and technical detail.
Phillip
---
Dr. Phillip Lougher (Squashfs author and maintainer)
--
___
devel mailing list -- de
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 8:48 AM Dusty Mabe
> What about squashfs? We use that for the live media, is that affected?
No, Squashfs uses unsigned 32-bit ints, which will roll over in 2106.
Phillip
---
Squashfs author and maintainer.
___
devel mailing l
