Re: trouble submitting fc26 package to bodhi

On 05/04/17 21:14, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2017-04-05 at 21:03 -0700, Pádraig Brady wrote: >> Hi, >> >> It looks like bodhi is open to fc26 updates, >> though I don't seem to be able to create them >> for packages I built a few weeks ago? >> >

trouble submitting fc26 package to bodhi

Hi, It looks like bodhi is open to fc26 updates, though I don't seem to be able to create them for packages I built a few weeks ago? $ fedpkg update ... Creating a new update for crudini-0.9-1.fc26 fedora.client.bodhi.BodhiClientException: Unable to determine release from build: crudini-0.9-1.fc

Re: Koji builders' specs

On 22/12/16 13:13, Pádraig Brady wrote: > On 21/12/16 16:04, Dan Horák wrote: >> On Tue, 20 Dec 2016 16:03:49 +0100 >> Pavel Raiskup wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> where is documented what system/hw is used on (primary) Koji builders? >>

Re: Koji builders' specs

On 21/12/16 16:04, Dan Horák wrote: > On Tue, 20 Dec 2016 16:03:49 +0100 > Pavel Raiskup wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> where is documented what system/hw is used on (primary) Koji builders? >> I'm interested in memory, storage, filesystem, host operating system, >> guest operating system (if those ar

Re: New sources format

On 20/12/16 22:28, Christopher wrote: > What's with the new sources format? > The old format, I could do `md5sum -c sources` > Why not make the new format with SHA512 follow the same pattern, so I could > do: `shasum -c sources` or `sha512sum -c sources`? > > Is there any standard command-line to

Re: The 'rpm -q --whatrequires' variant to get list of all dependant packages?

On 10/11/16 07:08, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > Is there something similar to 'dnf repoquery --whatrequires foo-libs > --all-deps' > in RPM? See the following: > > $ rpm -q --whatrequires libarchive > no package requires libarchive > $ sudo dnf remove libarchive > Dependencies resolved

Re: Slow configure scripts

On 27/10/16 20:19, Pádraig Brady wrote: > On 27/10/16 17:09, Pavel Raiskup wrote: >> On Thursday, October 27, 2016 3:23:25 PM CEST Pádraig Brady wrote: >>> On 24/10/16 17:35, Florian Weimer wrote: >>>> I recall some reports that configure scripts are really slow in re

Re: Slow configure scripts

On 27/10/16 17:09, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > On Thursday, October 27, 2016 3:23:25 PM CEST Pádraig Brady wrote: >> On 24/10/16 17:35, Florian Weimer wrote: >>> I recall some reports that configure scripts are really slow in recent >>> Fedora versions due to pervasive u

Re: Slow configure scripts

On 24/10/16 17:35, Florian Weimer wrote: > I recall some reports that configure scripts are really slow in recent > Fedora versions due to pervasive use of BIND_NOW. > > Has anyone investigated this further? Is there a bug report somewhere? Related to this I was wondering if there was any thoug

Re: Minimizing the fedora docker base image footprint

On 22/02/16 06:54, Courtney Pacheco wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I've spent some time trying to minimize the footprint of the Fedora > docker base image. Overall, I managed to reduce its size by 39.9%. Excellent. You might want to keep in mind the use of "coreutils-single" for Fedora 24 (or backpo

Re: F24 System Wide Change: Default Local DNS Resolver

On 01/12/15 15:59, Randy Barlow wrote: > This sounds overall pretty neat to me! One detail came to my mind: how > would this interact with VPN DNS servers? In my experience with VPNs, > it's common for them to provide a DNS server that allows internal host > resolution to work. Would this local res

Re: building conflicting packages from a single spec

On 19/11/15 11:11, Florian Festi wrote: > On 11/18/2015 04:26 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote: >> Is $subject possible? >> >> For example generating subpackages like: >> %{name}-small-but-slow-binaries >> %{name}-fast-but-big-binaries >> >> I can %prep an

Re: building conflicting packages from a single spec

On 18/11/15 22:34, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 04:34:16PM +0000, Pádraig Brady wrote: >> On 18/11/15 03:31, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: >>>>>>>> "PB" == Pádraig Brady writes: >>> >>> PB> Is $subject possible?

Re: Some analysis on the size of the minimal and Server installs of Fedora 23

On 17/11/15 17:03, Pádraig Brady wrote: > On 17/11/15 01:39, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> (Please keep responses on the devel@ list; I've set it in the Reply-To.) >> >> To jump right to the premise: The default Fedora Server install is Way >> Too Big(TM) and the mi

Re: building conflicting packages from a single spec

On 18/11/15 03:31, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: >>>>>> "PB" == Pádraig Brady writes: > > PB> Is $subject possible? > > I don't think so, since at the end of %install you have exactly one set > of files in one buildroot. Right. There was

building conflicting packages from a single spec

Is $subject possible? For example generating subpackages like: %{name}-small-but-slow-binaries %{name}-fast-but-big-binaries I can %prep and %install into separate areas, though was then wondering how to adjust the buildroot for subpackages? Are any other techniques possible? I suppose I cou

Re: Some analysis on the size of the minimal and Server installs of Fedora 23

On 17/11/15 01:39, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > (Please keep responses on the devel@ list; I've set it in the Reply-To.) > > To jump right to the premise: The default Fedora Server install is Way > Too Big(TM) and the minimal install (also available on the Fedora > Server install media) is also Too

Re: Announcing the release of Fedora 23 Beta!

On 23/09/15 18:19, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 12:13:39PM -0400, Eric Griffith wrote: >> Suggested way to upgrade from 22 to 23? Fresh install? Fedup? Change >> release ver for dnf? Did the new dnf upgrade tool get packaged? > > I've done this on a number of machines (I wo

Re: Announcing the release of Fedora 23 Beta!

On 22/09/15 18:02, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On Tue, 2015-09-22 at 12:13 -0400, Eric Griffith wrote: >> Suggested way to upgrade from 22 to 23? Fresh install? Fedup? Change >> release ver for dnf? Did the new dnf upgrade tool get packaged? > > `dnf install dnf-plugin-system-upgrade` > `dnf syste

Re: Fedora 23 cloud image (and, for that matter, minimal anything) bloat

On 21/09/15 16:07, Matthew Miller wrote: > Fedora-Cloud-Base-20141203-21.x86_64.qcow2: 151M > Fedora-Cloud-Base-23_Beta-20150915.x86_64.qcow2: 275M > > In just one year — 82% more awesome? > > I'd really like this to stay below 200MB as a competitive threshold. > Or, if we're going to b

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On 10/09/15 14:53, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > I assume that subject line got your attention. > The reason for this proposal is relatively simple: we know the > advantages to unbundling, particularly with security and resource- > usage. However, the world's developer community largely *does not > c

Re: Package python-qpid is blocked for tag f24: how to unblock it?

On 03/09/15 21:42, Irina Boverman wrote: > - Original Message - > From: "Pádraig Brady" >> I presume it was retired. >> To unretire you've to file a ticket I think. >> like this one for example: >> https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5592

Re: Package python-qpid is blocked for tag f24: how to unblock it?

On 03/09/15 20:01, Irina Boverman wrote: > BuildError: package python-qpid is blocked for tag f24 > > What do I need to do to unblock it? > -- > Regards, Irina. > -- > $ fedpkg build > Building python-qpid-0.32-9.fc24 for rawhide > Created task: 10944705 > Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/

Re: Is %autosetup another unwanted baby of Fedora?

On 13/07/15 15:01, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 02:39:57PM +0200, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: >> Hi >> >> When I moved to Fedora after years of doing Debian packages I >> noticed that there is no such thing as patch management when it >> comes to Fedora packages. Everyone is us

Re: UTF-8 locale in rpm build

On 11/05/15 04:43, Lars Seipel wrote: > On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 09:02:31AM +0200, Matěj Cepl wrote: >> Which part f C.UTF-8 is not covered by en_US.UTF-8? > > Let's see: > > % export LC_COLLATE=C > % bash -c 'case b in [A-Z]) echo upper;; *) echo lower;; esac' > lower > > Ok. Now en_US.UTF-8: >

Re: dnf caches

On 24/04/15 10:40, Radek Holy wrote: > - Original Message - >> From: "Pádraig Brady" >> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" >> >> Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 8:11:45 PM >> Subject: Re: dnf caches >> >> On 2

Re: dnf caches

On 23/04/15 18:44, drago01 wrote: > On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 7:07 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote: >> My Fedora 22 system prompted me that there was a new coreutils package for >> update. >> Rather than clicking "restart and install" in the GUI I tried to: >> &g

Re: dnf caches

On 23/04/15 18:46, Adam Williamson wrote: > Branched releases (i.e. F22 at present) do not use the 'updates' repo, > it is empty. Updates go from updates-testing to fedora when they are > marked as stable. So you need to clean 'fedora', not 'updates'. I had done that too, to no avail. thanks, Pád

dnf caches

My Fedora 22 system prompted me that there was a new coreutils package for update. Rather than clicking "restart and install" in the GUI I tried to: # dnf install coreutils Using metadata from Tue Apr 21 19:54:02 2015 (1 day, 21:50:24 hours old) Package coreutils-8.23-8.fc22.x86_64 is alrea

Re: should we consider making CoDel the default to combat bufferbloat?

On 28/03/15 04:40, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: > On 28.03.2015 04:42, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: >> On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 12:34:35AM +, Pádraig Brady wrote: >>> Following on from >>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.kernel/5549

should we consider making CoDel the default to combat bufferbloat?

Following on from http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.kernel/5549 Has there been any more consideration for enabling this by default? thanks, Pádraig. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: h

Re: Captive portal detection on wired connections - bug or feature?

On 26/03/15 17:50, Dan Williams wrote: > On Thu, 2015-03-26 at 18:29 +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 6:24 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote: >> >>> You can edit /etc/NetworkManager/conf.d/20-connectivity-fedora.conf to >>> disable it. >>> >> >> Is there a *proper* way to do th

Re: Changes in the f22 workstation

On 20/02/15 21:09, Matthias Clasen wrote: > I wanted to give a heads-up to the wider audience about a number of > workstation changes that are landing in the f22 branch (and rawhide) > this week, in time for the alpha freeze next week: > > - The message tray at the bottom is gone, notifications

Re: How many users does Fedora have?

On 02/12/14 18:12, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > On 2 December 2014 at 09:22, Matthew Miller > wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 05:15:38PM +0100, jfm...@free.fr > wrote: > > Now it seems Fedora's downloads have been steadil

Re: How many developers Fedora has

On 29/11/14 09:44, Ali AlipourR wrote: > Hi > Is there any statistics about How many developers Fedora has? Considering just packages: https://www.openhub.net/p/fedora-packages Of course there are many more behind the scenes of the programs themselves. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedorapro

Really making fonts awesome in Fedora 21

I was surprised at the blurriness of the _default_ font (Cantarell) on my new F21 install. There were noticeable artefacts as well as general blurriness with no noticeable difference between grayscale and rgba antialiasing. Even worse was different text heights for bold and normal which was immed

Re: unannounced libunistring soname bump

On 09/02/2014 04:12 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > On Tue, 02 Sep 2014 15:04:14 +0100 > Pádraig Brady wrote: > >> On 09/02/2014 01:08 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: >>> Hi All, >>> >>> there was a new build of libunistring today [1][2] which braought >>&g

Re: unannounced libunistring soname bump

On 09/02/2014 01:08 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > Hi All, > > there was a new build of libunistring today [1][2] which braought along > with it a soname bump from libunistring.so.0 to libunistring.so.2 > > On a f21 box repoquery tells me that > bigloo-0:4.1a-5.2.fc21.armv7hl > bigloo-libs-0:4.1a-5

Re: F22 System Wide Change: Replace Yum With DNF

On 06/11/2014 04:41 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 11.06.2014 17:37, schrieb Chuck Anderson: >> Have puppet, chef, ansible, salt, etc. been taught how to use "dnf" to >> install packages? I think it would be a shame to force all this >> software to do s/yum/dnf/ or to have to conditionally code

Re: Service units for web applications

On 02/25/2014 08:07 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Tue, 25.02.14 14:55, Stephen Gallagher (sgall...@redhat.com) wrote: > >> There are actually two pieces to this that I'd like to see (and >> hopefully have someone tell me are already possible): >> >> 1. The ability to add new ExecStartPre com

Re: Using git for patch management in Fedora

On 11/19/2013 10:55 AM, Mathieu Bridon wrote: > On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 10:32 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 06:28:47PM +0800, Mathieu Bridon wrote: >>> Or maybe we could start using %autosetup ? >>> >>> http://www.rpm.org/wiki/PackagerDocs/Autosetup >> >> '%autosetup -

Re: TLS libraries and licenses

On 11/27/2013 09:16 PM, Jerry James wrote: > On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Rex Dieter wrote: >> Jerry James wrote: >> >>> The third option is OpenSSL, whose license is GPL-incompatible, and so >>> not an option for us. >> >> at least in fedora, openssl is considered a "system library" (for gpl

Re: Using git for patch management in Fedora

This is definitely worth formalizing. On 11/19/2013 10:22 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Several packages are using git for patch management. eg: > > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/erlang.git/tree/erlang.spec#n46 > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/libguestfs.git/tree/libguestfs.spec?h=f20

Re: LVM thin provisioning and virt-manager

On 10/17/2013 07:09 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > > On Oct 17, 2013, at 10:22 AM, Chris Murphy wrote: > >> >> So whatever options virt-manager is using to create qcow2 files, is either >> the same as -o preallocation=metadata,compat=1.1,lazy_refcounts=on, or any >> difference in options isn't maki

Re: Suggestion: bmap files and bmaptool

On 08/16/2013 09:46 AM, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > Hi Eric, > > thanks for the question. Sorry my answers contain extra information, but > I assume that other people read this, and may benefit from the info. > After all, I am trying to get people interested, this is a good tool > IMO, and I would l

Re: Does your application depend on, or report, free disk space? Re: F20 Self Contained Change: OS Installer Support for LVM Thin Provisioning

On 07/26/2013 09:13 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote: > Hello all, > with thin provisioning available, the total and free space values > reported by a filesystem do not necessarily mean that that much space > is _actually_ available (the actual backing storage may be smaller, or > shared with other filesys

Re: Grepping through all Fedora specfiles?

On 07/23/2013 07:47 PM, Ville Skyttä wrote: > On 2013-07-22 18:55, Thomas Moschny wrote: >> >> Maybe you could use searchco.de in some creative way? >> http://searchcode.com/?q=url%3Afedora+ext%3Aspec+docdir > > Thanks for the pointer -- but what makes that less useful than it could > be is that

Re: GCC -fdiagnostics-color= default

On 05/27/2013 06:16 PM, John Reiser wrote: >> gcc 4.8.0-6.fc19 and later contains a backport of color diagnostics >> support from gcc trunk. ... >> Would users appreciate it being done by default (i.e. make >> -fdiagnostics-color=auto the default)? > >>> * Any pros/cons? > >> Same thing as pros/

Re: F19 DVD over size - what to drop?

On 05/01/2013 09:03 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > The F19 DVD is currently *way* over size. (i686: 417MB, x86_64: 311MB). > That's almost certainly more than can be fixed by trimming around the > edges; we need to remove actual functionality that's on the DVD. > > Options include: > > 1) One/some

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 19 Alpha Test Compose 2 (TC2) Available Now!

On 03/28/2013 04:54 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote: > On 03/28/2013 02:24 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote: >> On 03/26/2013 04:17 AM, Andre Robatino wrote: >>> *IMPORTANT*: All DVDs and Lives are oversized, so will not fit on the >>> standard media. >> >> To save others w

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 19 Alpha Test Compose 2 (TC2) Available Now!

On 03/28/2013 02:24 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote: > On 03/26/2013 04:17 AM, Andre Robatino wrote: >> *IMPORTANT*: All DVDs and Lives are oversized, so will not fit on the >> standard media. > > To save others wasted time, please note that TC2 is not installable on b

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 19 Alpha Test Compose 2 (TC2) Available Now!

On 03/26/2013 04:17 AM, Andre Robatino wrote: > *IMPORTANT*: All DVDs and Lives are oversized, so will not fit on the > standard media. To save others wasted time, please note that TC2 is not installable on bare metal: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928228 Also when installing to a

Re: Keystone on Rawhide tracebacks around sqlalchemy

On 02/19/2013 12:56 AM, Pete Zaitcev wrote: Greetings: When I try to run Keystone, it blows up with this: File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/migrate/versioning/schema.py", line 10, in from sqlalchemy import exceptions as sa_exceptions ImportError: cannot import name exceptions py

Re: Command line arguments depend on locale

On 01/31/2013 06:01 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote: - Original Message Right, output should be locale specific. Input command line args... seems specious. Until you put a pipe between and turn the outputs of command a into inputs of command b... It's a fair point. I.E. I/O doesn't ro

Re: Command line arguments depend on locale

On 01/30/2013 11:05 PM, Benny Amorsen wrote: Apparently ping has now started interpreting its command line arguments depending on locale. I.e. ping -i 0.1 no longer works in locales where comma is the decimal separator. This makes it difficult to call system commands. The only workaround is to s

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: OpenStack Grizzly

On 01/23/2013 09:42 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: Michael Scherer (m...@zarb.org) said: While it may be harder to predict the feature that will land in Openstack at this point, would it be possible to have at least a idea of the new features and changes that such upgrade will bring ? It is hard to

Re: New Online search for the Fedora Source

On 11/30/2012 12:09 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote: Benjamin Boyter has recently indexed the entire Fedora Source code. I.E. all 2 billion lines, 11K packages, 132 GB of it. For details including search syntax, please see: I managed to copy&paste a UTF8 BOM onto the end of the previous URL. Not

New Online search for the Fedora Source

Benjamin Boyter has recently indexed the entire Fedora Source code. I.E. all 2 billion lines, 11K packages, 132 GB of it. For details including search syntax, please see: http://www.pixelbeat.org/docs/fedora_source.html thanks, Pádraig. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https:

Re: raising warning flag on firewalld-default feature

On 11/12/2012 07:53 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 09:53:13PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: I really don't understand why a core system component such as firewalld is implemented in Python! Here, I mostly don't see the reason for it to be running all the time. Couldn't it be db

Re: [HEADS-UP] Rawhide: /tmp is now on tmpfs

On 05/31/2012 11:45 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote: On 05/31/2012 08:14 AM, Roberto Ragusa wrote: On 05/31/2012 02:40 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: Heya! Please be aware that since the most recent systemd uploads /tmp is now in tmpfs by default in Rawhide/F18. [...] This will most likely lead to a

Re: small tip regarding git branch bash prompt in F18/Rawhide

On 08/23/2012 12:12 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hey folks - just in case you haven't all figured this out yet, if you're > using the neat little trick of putting a few lines in your ~/.bashrc so that > when you're in a directory containing a git repo, the prompt will display > what branch you'r

Re: Mass rebuild for Fedora 18 Complete

On 07/22/2012 09:21 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 07:39:31 -0500 > Dennis Gilmore wrote: > >> it was requested in https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5222 that >> we do a mass rebuild for Fedora 18 for >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DwarfCompressor and >> https://fe

Re: Couldn't we enable 256 colors by default on TERM?

On 06/26/2012 07:35 PM, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Miloslav Trmač said: >> Another one is that connecting to systems that don't support xterm-256 >> is not quite easy. In particular, there appears to be no way to >> configure ~/.ssh/config so that "ssh oldhost" (and "ssh oldhost >> ar

Re: Couldn't we enable 256 colors by default on TERM?

On 06/26/2012 02:37 PM, Thomas Moschny wrote: > 2012/6/26 Chris Adams : >> The newer terminal >> programs have configuration menus for various things; do any of them set >> it there? If they don't, I would think it would be relatively easy to >> add (and hopefully upstreams would accept such patch

Re: Couldn't we enable 256 colors by default on TERM?

On 06/26/2012 03:56 AM, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Matthew Garrett said: >> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 08:47:16PM -0500, Chris Adams wrote: >>> Trying to do this in profile scripts assumes that you only run local >>> terminals that come from Fedora and that have been tested. For example,

Re: [HEADS-UP] Rawhide: /tmp is now on tmpfs

On 06/01/2012 08:56 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 01.06.2012 20:14, schrieb Simo Sorce: >> On Fri, 2012-06-01 at 12:58 -0500, Chris Adams wrote: >>> Once upon a time, Simo Sorce said: On Fri, 2012-06-01 at 11:02 -0500, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Reindl Harald said:

Re: Action required: Rawhide: /tmp is now on tmpfs

On 06/01/2012 02:47 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 06/01/2012 02:12 PM, Alexey I. Froloff wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 01:21:25PM +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote: >>> Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that Fedora 18 will ship with > I certainly disagree ... this change is not reasonable. > >>

Re: [HEADS-UP] Rawhide: /tmp is now on tmpfs

On 06/01/2012 12:15 AM, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > On Thursday, May 31 2012, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > >> On 05/31/2012 12:45 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote: >>> On 05/31/2012 08:14 AM, Roberto Ragusa wrote: > >>> Now /var/tmp should be "more persistent"

Re: Couldn't we enable 256 colors by default on TERM?

On 05/31/2012 11:09 AM, Marc Deop i Argemí wrote: > On Thursday 31 May 2012 02:20:26 Pádraig Brady wrote: >> On 05/30/2012 04:16 PM, Marc Deop wrote: >>> On Wednesday 30 May 2012 10:04:49 Pádraig Brady wrote: >>>> I've some notes about 256 colors here:

Re: [HEADS-UP] Rawhide: /tmp is now on tmpfs

On 05/31/2012 08:14 AM, Roberto Ragusa wrote: > On 05/31/2012 02:40 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: >> Heya! >> >> Please be aware that since the most recent systemd uploads /tmp is now >> in tmpfs by default in Rawhide/F18. > [...] >> This will most likely lead to a problem or two with software that

Re: Couldn't we enable 256 colors by default on TERM?

On 05/30/2012 04:16 PM, Marc Deop wrote: > On Wednesday 30 May 2012 10:04:49 Pádraig Brady wrote: >> I've some notes about 256 colors here: >> http://www.pixelbeat.org/docs/terminal_colours/#256 >> > > That information is mostly fine. There are some errors thou

Re: Couldn't we enable 256 colors by default on TERM?

On 05/30/2012 09:30 AM, Kévin Raymond wrote: > Hi there, > > We are building a leading edge Operating System, but still use only 8bit > colors > by default in our terminal (I don't know about KDE… I stay under > GNOME, gnome-term (xterm)). > This limit the colors of many applications like vim, sc

Re: Total size of Fedora source

On 05/18/2012 02:17 PM, Alek Paunov wrote: > Hi Rich, > > On 18.05.2012 15:49, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >> The reason is that I want to check out all the source for an >> experiment, and I need to know what order of disk space I will need [:-)] > > Would you like to elaborate - What kind of expe

Re: Total size of Fedora source

On 05/18/2012 01:49 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Does anyone have an estimate for the total size of the checked out and > "prepped" source code (w/o binaries) in Fedora (eg. in F17)? > > The reason is that I want to check out all the source for an > experiment, and I need to know what order of

Re: Please add GNU id-utils to Fedora

On 05/11/2012 09:14 AM, Jim Meyering wrote: > Miloslav Trmač wrote: >> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 9:49 PM, Greg McGary wrote: >>> Minor conflict: the name of one of id-utils main commands "lid" is also the >>> same as an existing command, though installed in a different place. >>> id-utils >>> has

Re: Install Fedora Button for LiveCD

On 05/02/2012 08:47 PM, Kalev Lember wrote: > On 05/01/2012 07:25 PM, Jared K. Smith wrote: >> I've got to be honest here -- I don't like the wording of the >> notification. /.../ > > Pádraig, Jared, Chris: > > Thanks for the suggestions > > How about this as the main text: > You are currently

Re: Install Fedora Button for LiveCD

On 05/01/2012 02:55 PM, Kalev Lember wrote: > On 04/28/2012 12:33 AM, Jared K. Smith wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: >>> I don't know how proposing and implementing a notification method of doing >>> the same isn't providing a solution, but you're welcome to your

Review swaps

Hi! I've a simple new package containing some support scripts for the OpenStack packages: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=811601 cheers, Pádraig. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Install Fedora Button for LiveCD

On 04/03/2012 02:26 PM, Kamil Paral wrote: > I was quite depressed how hard it can be for a layman to find a way to > install Fedora from LiveCD environment. On a more general note it would be nice to stream-line the experience from web to installation. Most of the hard parts are done, just a fe

Re: Fedora Packages Search

On 03/30/2012 08:43 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > On 03/30/2012 07:06 AM, Johannes Lips wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I really like this website[1] and think it's really useful. I just wanted to >> know what the current state of it is > > > There are two things I feel need improvements one is t

Re: urandom vs haveged

On 03/26/2012 11:55 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > > > On Mar 26, 2012, at 4:31 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote: >> >> Well if you're just writing huge amounts of "random" data >> to clear existing space, then you don't need it to be cryptographically >>

Re: urandom vs haveged

On 03/26/2012 08:56 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > > Performance: > > dd if=/dev/zero ~56MB/s CPU < 10% > dd if=/dev/urandom~12MB/s CPU 99% > haveged ~54MB/s CPU < 25% > > > The dd relative values are consistent with kernels in Fedora 1

Re: /etc/default in Fedora

On 03/06/2012 04:21 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > On 03/05/2012 03:20 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote: >> Hi, > >> I wanted to add "selinux=0" to the kernel command line on F17. I >> checked /etc/sysconfig/, /etc/grub.d/, next I started to read >> /etc/grub.d/10_linux (this new grub2 is so user friend

Re: GPT and Fedora 17

On 03/02/2012 07:09 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > > On Mar 2, 2012, at 10:37 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote: > >> Yep as expected F17 alpha is broken in the same way on my laptop. > > Your laptop is what hardware? Any install media kernel parameters used? What > installation type?

Re: GPT and Fedora 17

On 02/07/2012 12:54 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2012-02-06 at 23:19 +0000, Pádraig Brady wrote: >> On 02/06/2012 10:40 PM, Brian C. Lane wrote: >>> In Fedora 16 we changed to using GPT as the default disklabel for new >>> installs. In a few cases, mostly lim

Re: GPT and Fedora 17

On 02/06/2012 10:40 PM, Brian C. Lane wrote: > In Fedora 16 we changed to using GPT as the default disklabel for new > installs. In a few cases, mostly limited to Lenovo hardware, we found > that some BIOS's would not boot from GPT. We blacklisted Lenovo, falling > back to msdos labels in order to

Re: Bad coding practices in Fedora packages

On 01/03/2012 01:32 PM, Denys Vlasenko wrote: > I installed F16 on a new machine, trying to keep the installation > more or less lean. Meaning - not installing tons of packages w/o > thinking and ending up with tons of installed stuff I don't even know > what it is. > > Today, I'm looking at my pr

Re: Results of a test mass rebuild of rawhide/x86_64 with gcc-4.7.0-0.1.fc17

On 01/02/2012 06:03 PM, Jim Meyering wrote: > Nils Philippsen wrote: > ... >> I've attached a list of packages and (co)maintainers, to easily find if >> one of your packages is affected or not. > ... >> iwhd: meyering - clalance,zaitcev > > Thank you for the list. > > I have just tried to build i

Re: F17 heads up: gnome-shell for everyone!

On 11/08/2011 12:45 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 09:31 +1100, Bojan Smojver wrote: > >> I think what will most likely happen is that someone out there will come >> up with an extension to nuke the Activities button and replace it with >> Applications button. And that will be

Re: UsrMove feature (was Re: FESCo meeting minutes for 2011-10-24)

This feature is going to cause a lot of churn. Aside from the huge changes within fedora I think a bigger issue will be downstream of fedora where third party packages and configs will require large changes. I would worry we might alienate our users a bit with this? Now I'm all for clean up, but

Re: F15: ugly behavior of "df"

On 23/06/11 16:21, Pádraig Brady wrote: > On 23/06/11 15:53, Karel Zak wrote: >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709351 >> >> The tools (not only df(1)) have to be fixed to de-duplicate the list >> of fileststems. It's standard behavior that the same f

Re: [INFO] New benchmark on SELINUX and Fedora 15 from Phoronix

On 23/06/11 14:45, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > On 06/23/2011 08:58 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote: >> On 23/06/11 12:28, Lennart Poettering wrote: >>> On Thu, 23.06.11 12:58, yersinia (yersinia.spi...@gmail.com) wrote: >>> >>>> Greetings >>>> >>&g

Re: F15: ugly behavior of "df"

On 23/06/11 15:53, Karel Zak wrote: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709351 > > The tools (not only df(1)) have to be fixed to de-duplicate the list > of fileststems. It's standard behavior that the same filesystem could > be mounted on more places. > > The 'bind' flag is another w

Re: [INFO] New benchmark on SELINUX and Fedora 15 from Phoronix

On 23/06/11 12:28, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Thu, 23.06.11 12:58, yersinia (yersinia.spi...@gmail.com) wrote: > >> Greetings >> >> Perhaps it is of interest to this list that Phonorix has produced a new >> benchmark about the performance impact of SELinux on >> Fedora 15. Look very good >> ht

Re: GNOME3 and au revoir WAS: systemd: please stop trying to take over the world :)

On 17/06/11 12:17, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: > On 06/17/2011 01:02 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >> I can't believe real usability testing was done on the final version >> of GNOME 3. I keep hearing about all these completely undiscoverable >> keyboard shortcuts that appear to be necessary to u

Re: [HEADS-UP] Moving /var/run and /var/lock to tmpfs in Rawhide

On 24/11/10 01:41, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 11:54:47PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: >> I think the fact that we get less disks accesses (just think noatime and >> stuff for the files dropped there) is more interesting than using the >> absolute minimal amount of memory. >

Re: [HEADS-UP] Moving /var/run and /var/lock to tmpfs in Rawhide

On 23/11/10 20:48, Lennart Poettering wrote: > Heya! > > I hereby want to let everybody know that in the next days I will turn on > /var/run and /var/lock on tmpfs on Rawhide/F15. This is in accordance > with the following accepted F15 feature: We run stateless systems here and both of the above

Re: Developers of packages please pay attention to selinux labeling.

On 13/07/10 16:57, Matěj Cepl wrote: > Dne 13.7.2010 17:33, Pádraig Brady napsal(a): >> Personally I do momentarily enable to test but always disable >> because of _hundreds_ of errors in the applet thingy. > > Hundreds? I have been running RHEL-6 from mid-Januray (that means

Re: Developers of packages please pay attention to selinux labeling.

On 13/07/10 15:47, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 03:11:44PM +0100, Christopher Brown wrote: >>> >>> As long as you give us a heads up we can prevent these types of blowups. >>> Since this policy is shared between yum, packagekit >> >> Whilst I appreciate your huge efforts to provide

Re: gethostbyname() and resolv.conf updates

On 21/06/10 15:40, Colin Walters wrote: > On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 10:54 PM, Dan Williams wrote: >> >> I'm just gonna make NM use a local caching nameserver (which means >> dnsmasq) by default at some point soon. People that don't want it can >> turn it off. > > When thinking about this, there's

  1   2   >