Re: F43 Change Proposal: Let's Preserve Debuginfo in Static Libraries (system wide)

On Tue, Jul 8, 2025 at 7:20 PM Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: > > Hi - > > I wrote: > > > I see what you mean. I've tried to gather this data about llvm on my > > workstation, but recent rpmbuild's keep barfing with: [...] > > Uninstalling lua-devel and glibc-devel.i686 resulted in complete & > compara

Re: F43 Change Proposal: Let's Preserve Debuginfo in Static Libraries (system wide)

On Mon, Jul 7, 2025 at 11:55 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 04, 2025 at 02:28:38PM +0100, Aoife Moloney via devel-announce > wrote: > > Wiki - > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/StaticLibraryPreserveDebuginfo > > Discussion thread - > > > https://dis

Working around multilib symlink conflicts in llvm

Hi! In f42 the main llvm package switched to installing all files under a /usr/lib{64}/llvmN prefix and providing symlinks in the default prefix, to align the contents between the versioned and unversioned packages. What we were not aware of at the time is that rpm's support for symlinks is very b

Re: fedora-ci.koji-build.rpmdeplint.functional no longer exists for gating

On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 11:59 AM Cristian Le via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On 2025/04/25 11:44, Dimitris Soumis wrote: > > Hello, > > By defining a > > - !PassingTestCaseRule {test_case_name: > fedora-ci.koji-build.rpmdeplint.functional} > > > in gating.yaml >

Re: Rawhide-only gating?

On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 5:48 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2025-02-27 at 09:32 +0100, Nikita Popov wrote: > > Hi! > > > > Is it possible to somehow limit some gating rules in gating.yml only to > > Fedora rawhide? For example, to gate on rpmdeplint (which

Rawhide-only gating?

Hi! Is it possible to somehow limit some gating rules in gating.yml only to Fedora rawhide? For example, to gate on rpmdeplint (which is only available for rawhide), we've tried something like this: --- !Policy product_versions: - fedora-rawhide decision_contexts: - bodhi_update_push_stable

Re: Fedora CI for large RPMs?

On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 12:38 PM František Lachman wrote: > Hi Nikita, > > I can't speak on behalf of Fedora CI or Zuul but I want to mention that in > the Packit team[0], we are trying to help in this situation of not having > much capacity to maintain existing CI solutions for dist-git. > > Sin

Fedora CI for large RPMs?

Hi! The llvm rpm (https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/llvm) has recently been struggling with Fedora CI, by which I mean the CI that produces scratch builds and runs dist-git tests on merge requests. The llvm rpm has a combination of long build times (typically 3-8 hours on koji, depending on arch

Re: Copr Modularity, the End of an Era

On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 5:32 PM Jakub Kadlcik wrote: > Hello everybody, > I'd like to announce that all Modularity features in Copr (except for > module hotfixes) are now deprecated, and we have a plan to slowly remove > them from our codebase. > > For more reasoning and the retirement schedule,

Re: F41 Change Proposal - Python Built with gcc -03 (self-contained)

On Sat, Apr 13, 2024 at 5:55 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 07:08:36PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > > I would like for us to consider evaluating a global change to -O3. I > > am not convinced that there's a good reason anymore to remain at -O2. > > FYI here are the optimizat

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 39 Python 3.12 rebuilds to start in a side tag this week

On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 12:11 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 16. 06. 23 12:07, Nikita Popov wrote: > > We have a conflicting python-lit build sitting in another side tag -- > we'll > > discard that one and rebuild once your side tag is merged. > > If it's already

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 39 Python 3.12 rebuilds to start in a side tag this week

On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 11:20 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 13. 06. 23 14:02, Tomas Hrnciar wrote: > > Hello, > > > > in order to deliver Python 3.12, we are running a coordinated rebuild in > a side > > tag. > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3.12 > >