his reliance on Redis
in his own projects[1].
[0] https://discourse.writefreesoftware.org
[1]
https://discourse.writefreesoftware.org/t/redis-switches-to-dual-source-available-licensing-model/154/3
Cheers,
Mike
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.f
HAR_NULL`
terminator of `image->LoadOptions` (when `arguments` is non-empty), so
I believe the `first_new_option_size` handling in the file needs
updating in a similar manner too.
Sincerely,
Mike Beaton
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedorapro
Yes, python3-pyhunspell is only another option of python3-enchant is not
available (for example on FreeBSD that is the case)
> ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'packaging'
This can be workarounded by
dnf install python3-packaging
But I added it to the requirements in the ibus-typing-bo
Thank you for this headsup, I want to share some info too. I have found one
site https://soclikes.com/buy-instagram-mentions-user-followers, here you can
cheap get instagram mentions user followers. So, everyone, who need it, go here.
___
devel mailing
Thank you for this headsup, I want to share some info too. I have found one
site https://soclikes.com/buy-instagram-mentions-user-followers, here you can
cheap get instagram mentions user followers. So, everyone, who need it, go here.
___
devel mailing
th updates repo enabled yields current system without
doing the almost inevitable post-install (from non-netinstall image)
update
--
Mike
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fed
-booster look like one input support for
> each supported language, or does it look like a single input source?
It looks like a single input source. Here are some
screen shots how to add it using the GNOME "Region & Language" panel:
http://mike-fabian.github.io/ibus-typing-booster/d
at 8:26 PM Jason L Tibbitts III
wrote:
> >>>>> "MM" == Mike Miller writes:
>
> MM> I have installed the latest fedpkg, fedpkg-1.35-1.fc28.noarch. Do I
> MM> need to upgrade to 29? I thought fedpkg would still work on 28.
>
> I'm still on F2
Hello - I am trying to update a package on Fedora 28 but am getting this
error any time I try to run fedpkg:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/fedpkg", line 6, in
from pkg_resources import load_entry_point
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py", l
an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
&
nd and see you tomorrow!
[0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Criteria
// Mike
--
Fedora QA
___
test-announce mailing list -- test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce
doraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Criteria
// Mike
--
Fedora QA
___
test-announce mailing list -- test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
__
eta is
> a bit of a mess with the remaining libdb issues, but that needs to be
> discussed at a different level than the QA team.
>
> If anyone does want to have a meeting and is willing to run it, please
> just go ahead and say so (and send out an agenda).
>
> Mike
ekend!
// Mike
--
Fedora QA
___
test-announce mailing list -- test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
devel mailing list --
the SOP on the wiki:
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
Have a good rest of the weekend and see you on Monday!
[0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Criteria
// Mike
--
Fedora QA
___
test-annou
on Monday!
[0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Criteria
// Mike
--
Fedora QA
___
test-announce mailing list -- test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le..
ne - check
out the SOP on the wiki:
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
Have a good weekend and see you on Monday!
[0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Criteria
// Mike
--
Fedora QA
___
test-annou
Greetings testers! We don't have any proposed blockers for Beta or
Final right now, so I propose that we cancel tomorrows meeting.
If you find a blocker or want to discuss something, please reply to this
thread and we'll have the meeting!
Thanks!
// Mike
--
how a Blocker Review Meeting
works - or how it's supposed to go and you want to run one - check
out the SOP on the wiki:
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
Have a good weekend and see you on Monday!
[0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Crite
re curious how a Blocker Review Meeting
works - or how it's supposed to go and you want to run one - check
out the SOP on the wiki:
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
Have a good weekend and see you on Monday!
[0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Cr
_Bug_Meeting
Have a good weekend and see you on Monday!
[0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Criteria
// Mike
--
Fedora QA
___
test-announce mailing list -- test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email
those two bugs, please reply to the list!
Thanks and see you on IRC!
// Mike
--
Fedora QA
___
test-announce mailing list -- test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedorap
ting
Have a good weekend and see you on Monday!
[0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Criteria
// Mike
--
Fedora QA
___
test-announce mailing list -- test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le..
Greetings testers! We had a long run of blocker reviews the past couple
weeks, and there's currently only one proposal for Beta and one for
Final. I think we can take this week off and focus on finding more
blocker proposals for next week!
Thanks!
// Mike
--
Fedo
o go and you want to run one - check
out the SOP on the wiki:
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
Have a good weekend and see you on Monday!
[0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Criteria
// Mike
--
Fedora QA
_
:
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
Have a good Sunday and see you on Monday!
[0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Criteria
// Mike
--
Fedora QA
___
test-announce mailing list -- test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscrib
# F26 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2017-03-13
# Time: 17:00 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers! We're getting ready to make a Go/No-Go decision for
F26 Alpha and we've got 3 proposed blockers for Alpha. Beta and Final
each have 1. We should have a blocke
On 01/31/2017 10:24 AM, Jan Kurik wrote:
= System Wide Change: Kerberos KCM credential cache by default =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/KerberosKCMCache
Change owner(s):
* Jakub Hrozek
Default to a new Kerberos credential cache type called KCM which is
better suited for containerized
, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jan 2017 10:59:21 -0500
> Mike Miller wrote:
>
> > I have been testing package updates to Hadoop on a Fedora Rawhide AWS
> > VM. I am able to build locally on the Rawhide VM and scratch build
> > successfully on all architectures but
I have been testing package updates to Hadoop on a Fedora Rawhide AWS VM. I
am able to build locally on the Rawhide VM and scratch build successfully
on all architectures but ARMv7hl. I have no way to debug/test on this
architecture.
Does anyone know of an AWS image for ARM? Any other tips for b
Success here.
Possible gotchas, depending on setup:
1) make sure your krb5.conf has:
includedir /etc/krb5.conf.d/
2) if you have any custom koji config, you might need to adjust that.
You need the some of the updated settings from koji.conf in the latest
koji build.
On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 9:46
On 8 Dec 2016, at 11:22, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On miércoles, 7 de diciembre de 2016 1:56:32 PM CST Mike Pinkerton
wrote:
I use the Server netinstall image. Use cases include loop mounting
the netinstall .iso on boxes with Grub2 -- works on remote boxes
where there is no physical access and
netinstall discs? Is there any
difference other than in default preferences? Is there a way to do a
single disc with a choice of "give me Server defaults" or "give me
Everything defaults"?
--
Mike
___
devel mailing list -- devel
condary hostname
though,
and a randomly generated one would fit perfectly for this sort of
use case.
Now that would be confusing for users -- a hidden name that bears no
relation to the exposed name.
--
Mike
___
devel mailing list -- de
Hello,
My name is Mike Miller and I have been a software developer for almost ten
years. I am fairly new as a committer to the Open Source Community but I
have developed software using many different free and open source tools. I
frequently use Linux systems, mainly CentOS and am interested in
n the SwiftKey keyboard to enable emoji input which
is useful in my opinion.
Using Googles japanese input on Android one can also input emoji nicely.
--
Mike FABIAN
睡眠不足はいい仕事の敵だ。
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
mething like ibus-gucharmap?
> The IBus XKB engine is not discoverable (it's not listed in GNOME's
> Region & Language settings) and the keyboard shortcut to input emojis
> is also not discoverable. Having a separate input method is likely the
> better way to implemen
f we have a
emoji font with colour available in Fedora which works everywhere.
--
Mike FABIAN
睡眠不足はいい仕事の敵だ。
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
be some problems with the font though:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350700#c2
But freetype nicely displays it in colour:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350700#c3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1176850
> Cheers
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@
On Thu, 2016-05-12 at 13:57 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> /etc/repos.d is less typing.
+1
Or better yet, just /etc/repos?
--
Mike Chambers
Madisonville, KY
"Best lil town on Earth!"
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admi
ault
> > > reposdir =
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ReposInEtcDistroReposD
> > >
> > >
>
> Why not just /etc/system.repos.d?
Hell, if really want to make it simple, why not just /etc/repos.d? Or
better yet, just /etc/repos/?
--
Mike Chambe
That is out of scope as koji will not be actually performing signing as
part of this feature, just utilizing rpm signatures that have already been
imported. Neat idea, but bigger problem and not really related to this
On Dec 1, 2015 7:37 AM, "Petr Spacek" wrote:
> On 1.12.2015 13:15, Jan Kurik wr
On 10/28/15 12:30 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
"MB" == Mike Bonnet writes:
MB> That sounds like a good plan. Is this work being tracked anywhere?
As you might expect, in an FPC ticket:
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/567
Thanks! I'll follow along there.
--
On 10/28/15 12:21 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
Luckily I saw this. The best way to make sure the packaging committee
sees this kind of thing is to open a ticket at
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/
However, I don't believe your assertion to be true. python*-devel is
the package with the depende
and/or:
BuildRequires: python3
in the general case, and only use the -devel packages if compiling
extensions?
Thanks,
Mike
Note: tried to send this to packag...@lists.fedoraproject.org but it
never got past the moderator.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
doraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
Have a good weekend and see you Monday!
[0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Criteria
--
// Mike
--
Fedora QA
freenode: roshi
http://roshi.fedorapeople.org
___
test-announce mai
out
the SOP on the wiki:
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
Have a good weekend and see you Monday!
[0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Criteria
--
// Mike
--
Fedora QA
freenode: roshi
http://roshi.fedorapeople.org
and see you Monday!
[0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Criteria
--
// Mike
--
Fedora QA
freenode: roshi
http://roshi.fedorapeople.org
___
test-announce mailing list
test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/t
ee you Monday!
[0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Criteria
--
// Mike
--
Fedora QA
freenode: roshi
http://roshi.fedorapeople.org
___
test-announce mailing list
test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-a
Well, it appears that Bugzilla is currently experiencing some issues, so
we had to move today's blocker review to tomorrow. Providing that
Bugzilla is up and working by 1600 UTC tomorrow (2015-09-22), we'll be
having the blocker review then.
Thanks!
--
// Mike
--
Fedora QA
freenode:
://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
Have a good weekend and see you tomorrow!
[0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Criteria
--
// Mike
--
Fedora QA
freenode: roshi
http://roshi.fedorapeople.org
___
test-announc
w it's supposed to go and you want to run one - check out
the SOP on the wiki:
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
Have a good weekend and see you Monday!
[0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Criteria
--
// Mike
--
Fedora QA
freenode: roshi
also fine. Otherwise, enjoy having your Monday morning back!
Thanks!
--
// Mike
--
Fedora QA
freenode: roshi
http://roshi.fedorapeople.org
___
test-announce mailing list
test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/li
]
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/7896/10927896/Fedora-Docker-Base-rawhide-20150902.x86_64.tar.xz
[1]
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/tasks?start=0&state=all&view=tree&method=image&order=-id
--
// Mike
--
Fedora QA
freenode: roshi
http://roshi.fedora
o run one - check out
the SOP on the wiki:
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
Have a good weekend and see you Monday!
[0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Criteria
--
// Mike
--
Fedora QA
freenode: roshi
http://roshi.fedorapeople.org
__
s - or how it's supposed to go and you want to run one - check out
the SOP on the wiki:
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
Have a good weekend and see you Monday!
[0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Criteria
--
// Mike
--
Fedora QA
week. Does
this Thursday (2015-08-20) at 16:00 UTC work for people? If there's a better
time, please
respond to the test list and we can find a better window to run the review.
Thanks!
Mike Ruckman
___
test-announce mailing list
:)
--
// Mike
--
Fedora QA
freenode: roshi
http://roshi.fedorapeople.org
___
test-announce mailing list
test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
s - or how it's supposed to go and you want to run one - check out
the SOP on the wiki:
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
See you Monday!
[0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Criteria
--
// Mike
--
Fedora QA
freenode: roshi
http://ro
d to go and you want to run one - check out
the SOP on the wiki:
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
Have a good weekend and see you Monday!
[0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Criteria
--
// Mike
--
Fedora QA
freenode: roshi
http://ro
On 10 Jul 2015, at 15:40, Björn Persson wrote:
Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Fri, 2015-07-03 at 11:21 -0400, Mike Pinkerton wrote:
Isn't the whole point to eliminate the need for third party
certificate authorities entirely?
Well I think you could choose to do that, or you could choo
eeting.
Thanks!
[0] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1236937
--
// Mike
--
Fedora QA
freenode: roshi
http://roshi.fedorapeople.org
___
test-announce mailing list
test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailma
then you would distrust the site. But
if there is no third party certificate authority chain, and DANE
succeeds, then you would accept the DANE-provided certificate and
trust the site.
--
Mike
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listin
dora-qa on
Freenode or respond on the test list.
Thanks and happy testing!
[0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/23/Schedule
[1] https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1445
--
// Mike
--
Fedora QA
freenode: roshi
http://roshi.fedorapeople.org
_
Hey devel list!
I'm Mike (mostly known as roshi on freenode) and I'd like to become a
packager. I don't have much experience (outside of local scratch builds
to test fixes) with packaging, but I'd like to learn more and get
involved. I've posted my first package for rev
s/schedule/f-22/f-22-quality-tasks.html
[2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan
[3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_22_Final_Release_Criteria
[4] irc://irc.freenode.net/fedora-qa
[5] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
--
// Mike
--
Fedora QA
Bug_Meeting
See you Monday!
[0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Criteria
--
// Mike
--
Fedora QA
freenode: roshi
http://roshi.fedorapeople.org
___
test-announce mailing list
test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.
:
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
See you tomorrow!
[0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Criteria
--
// Mike
--
Fedora QA
freenode: roshi
http://roshi.fedorapeople.org
___
test-announce mailing list
test-an
On 18 Mar 2015, at 08:40, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
On 03/16/2015 06:48 PM, Mike Pinkerton wrote:
If the working group deems the software to be that useful,
wouldn't it be better to bring its packaging up to the
quality of the "official" Fedora repo, and make it more easily
disc
product" install of Fedora?
Just asking what the thinking is here ...
--
Mike
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
ou want to run one - check out
the SOP on the wiki:
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
Have a good weekend and see you Monday!
[0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Criteria
--
// Mike
--
Fedora QA
freenode: roshi
as /usr/bin/apg, and
give the user a choice of generating a random password of whatever
length the user wants, or simply entering whatever insecure password
the user deems appropriate given the anticipated use of the installed
OS.
--
Mike
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraprojec
On 7 Mar 2015, at 20:35, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On 7 March 2015 at 15:33, Mike Pinkerton
wrote:
On 7 Mar 2015, at 15:52, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On 7 March 2015 at 11:53, Mike Pinkerton
wrote:
On 7 Mar 2015, at 10:41, Björn Persson wrote:
Mike Pinkerton wrote:
On 6 Mar
On 7 Mar 2015, at 15:52, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On 7 March 2015 at 11:53, Mike Pinkerton
wrote:
On 7 Mar 2015, at 10:41, Björn Persson wrote:
Mike Pinkerton wrote:
On 6 Mar 2015, at 23:49, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2015-03-06 at 23:09 +0100, Björn Persson wrote:
I hope https
On 7 Mar 2015, at 10:41, Björn Persson wrote:
Mike Pinkerton wrote:
On 6 Mar 2015, at 23:49, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2015-03-06 at 23:09 +0100, Björn Persson wrote:
I hope https://xkcd.com/936/will be among the inputs to that
discussion.
I'm fond of noting that pwquality ha
On 7 Mar 2015, at 02:16, Adam Williamson wrote:
for 15:00 UTC. If your clocks go back this weekend, the meeting should
be at the same local time as it was before. If your clocks don't go
back, it will be one hour earlier.
Spring forward, Fall back.
--
Mike
--
devel mailing list
27;ve been using correcthorse as my stock
anaconda testing password, since the strength check has been
enforced...
It won't stand up to a combinator attack:
<https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2013/06/a_really_good_a.html>
--
Mike
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fe
linux computers in the
world, that had to all of a sudden cause a panic to strengthen passwords
in the installer.
--
Mike Chambers
Madisonville, KY
"Best little town on Earth!"
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
cker Review Meeting
works - or how it's supposed to go and you want to run one - check out
the SOP on the wiki:
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
See you Monday!
[0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Criteria
--
// Mike
--
Fedora QA
freenode:
doraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Criteria
--
// Mike
--
Fedora QA
freenode: roshi
http://roshi.fedorapeople.org
___
test-announce mailing list
test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce
--
deve
A:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
Have a good weekend and see you Monday!
[0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Criteria
--
// Mike
--
Fedora QA
freenode: roshi
http://roshi.fedorapeople.org
___
test-announce mailing list
test-annou...@list
doraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Criteria
--
// Mike
--
Fedora QA
freenode: roshi
http://roshi.fedorapeople.org
--
// Mike
--
Fedora QA
freenode: roshi
http://roshi.fedorapeople.org
___
test-announce mailing list
test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://adm
ure it out from
there.
If you have any questions about test days or the process, please don't
hesitate to contact me or any other QA Team member in #fedora-qa on
Freenode or respond on the test list.
Thanks and happy testing!
[0] https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/457
--
/
k out
the SOP on the wiki:
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
See you Monday!
[0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Criteria
--
// Mike
--
Fedora QA
freenode: roshi
http://roshi.fedorapeople.org
___
test-announc
s it been upgraded to the official
released packages and just not renamed?
Mike Chambers
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
e of you who are curious how a Blocker Review Meeting
works - or how it's supposed to go and you want to run one - check out
the SOP on the wiki:
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
See you soon!
[0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Criteria
--
// Mike
p and have access to sudo.
As far as I can see, firstboot is only useful on one's personal box.
--
Mike Pinkerton
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On 12 Jan 2015, at 12:02, P J P wrote:
On Monday, 12 January 2015 8:47 PM, Mike Pinkerton wrote:
Not just virtualized deployments, but also in remote installs on bare
metal.
Okay and the '%post' install section trick won't help there?
IIUC, it'd depend on which tool
'%post' install
section of the kick-start file.
Not just virtualized deployments, but also in remote installs on bare
metal.
--
Mike Pinkerton
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Con
Will F22 introduce plasma5 when it rolls out?
--
Mike Chambers
Madisonville, KY
"Best little town on Earth!"
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
run one - check out
the SOP on the wiki:
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
See you Monday!
[0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Criteria
--
// Mike
--
Fedora QA
freenode: roshi
http://roshi.fedorapeople.org
_
.
Often not the case in small business or third party hosted
environments. Without remote ssh, box is unmanageable.
Even if you want to do key-based authentication rather than password,
you still need to use password initially to get the key onto the
remote box.
--
Mike Pinkerton
n layouts are moved from
/usr/share/X11/xkb/rules/{evdev,base}.xml
to
/usr/share/X11/xkb/rules/{evdev,base}.extras.xml
they are still available for Anaconda, only the
“gnome-control-center region” does not show them anymore by default,
right?
--
Mike FABIAN
☏ Office: +49-69-3
ne - check out the SOP
on the wiki:
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
See you Wednesday!
[0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Criteria
--
// Mike
--
Fedora QA
freenode: roshi
http://roshi.fedorapeople.org
efine this some loss of usability. If it
is about remotely installed VM images, it's also discussed
here -> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/security/2014-
December/002061.html
Remotely installed on bare metal.
--
Mike Pinkerton
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.
On 10 Dec 2014, at 12:52, Ben Cotton wrote:
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Mike Pinkerton
wrote:
I also am trying to figure out how I can use Fedora going forward
to support
general desktop requirements for SMB office workers, creative
types and
others who have heretofore been using
t it into a general desktop OS.
I have not yet tested and don't know how practical either of those
ideas is.
My users are accustomed to Gnome, so I prefer not to change to one of
the alternative desktop environment spins if there is an easy way
forward with Gnome.
--
Mike Pinkerton
-
On 8 Dec 2014, at 17:07, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 03:20:30PM -0500, Mike Pinkerton wrote:
burning your old market when trying to grow a new one. From a
marketing standpoint, that is just crazy. In a for-profit company,
where products are connected to revenue streams, it
thought that opening up the firewall
defaults was the best compromise. I disagree. Perhaps a better
compromise would have been to leave the old defaults in place, and
add a new pre-configured "more open" zone for those who want fewer
constraints.
--
Mike Pinkerton
--
dev
ing a meeting.
OTOH, if we do find some tonight or before the meeting tomorrow we'll go
ahead and have the meeting to discuss whatever has been found.
Just wanted to give everyone a heads up. Thanks!
--
// Mike
--
Fedora QA
freenode: roshi
http
1 - 100 of 557 matches
Mail list logo
